KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/roger.dnai/98Book/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/roger.dnai/98Book/voorhoeve98.htm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad//DTD HoTMetaL PRO 4.0::19971010::extensions to HTML 4.0//EN"
 "hmpro4.dtd">

<HTML>
  
  <HEAD>
    <TITLE>Former Netherlands Defense Minister J.J.C. Voorhoeve's Address to
    XVth NATO Workshop, Vienna</TITLE>
  </HEAD>
  
  <BODY LINK="0000ff" BGPROPERTIES="FIXED" BGCOLOR="ffffff"><BASEFONT SIZE="3">
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="6" FACE="Palatino">Post-Conflict
      Peace Building and Disengagement</FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT SIZE="+1"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="4" FACE="Palatino">Former
      Netherlands Defense Minister Dr. Joris J. C. Voorhoeve</FONT></FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Defense
      Ministers prepare troops to deter aggressors and to send soldiers into
      combat or on peacekeeping operations. Traditionally, we do not concern
      ourselves with civil reconstruction, development assistance, or building
      democracy in other countries. But the time has come to also concern
      ourselves actively with those non-military tasks. The possibility of
      bringing our troops home after the completion of their military operations
      depends on the progress made in civil reconstruction, and military
      disengagement depends on post-conflict peace building. As we have seen in
      Bosnia, the length of time our troops must stay in a war-torn zone depends
      on the progress we make in building a stable, peaceful state. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">The rising
      number of peacekeeping operations during the 1990s has justifiably
      increased the attention paid to post-conflict peace building. The concept
      of this effort was introduced in 1992 by then-Secretary General of the
      U.N. Boutros Boutros-Ghali in his &#147;Agenda for Peace.&#148; There he
      defined the concept as &#147;action to identify and support structures
      which will tend to strengthen and solidify peace in order to avoid a
      relapse into conflict.&#148; In a recent report to the Security Council,
      U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan once more pointed out the importance of
      integrated peace building and effective coordination by the U.N. The
      Secretary-General proposed establishing a strategic framework that
      includes aid structures for peace building. </FONT> </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>THE
      RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEACE BUILDING AND PEACEKEEPING</B></FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">I would like
      to discuss with you some of the problems concerning peace building. In the
      Netherlands, the strong relationship between peace building and
      peacekeeping is widely acknowledged. We have, therefore, started to break
      down the traditional division between various forms of aid in the context
      of development cooperation and other forms of foreign aid. Defense
      Department activities used to be focused strictly on the particular
      conflict, and &#147;development cooperation&#148; on the post-conflict
      situation. We are now looking to establish integrated and, therefore,
      well-coordinated, peace-building operations. </FONT> </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><FONT SIZE="+1">Working
      Toward Peace Building</FONT></FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Steps in
      this direction have also been taken by the international community. Along
      with the Netherlands, the United States has supported the idea of a
      special facility at the World Bank for releasing aid money to poor
      countries that have been through an armed conflict. In addition, in 1997,
      the OECD developed special guidelines within its Development Aid Committee
      that are also applicable to peace building. NATO carries out an important
      task in Bosnia with its &#147;Cimic&#148; (civil-military cooperation)
      units. NGOs such as the International Red Cross and Red Crescent, Doctors
      Without Borders, and the International Institute for Democracy and
      Electoral Assistance also play a major role. And regional organizations
      such as the European Union, OSCE, and the Council of Europe are active as
      well, though their expertise in peace building should perhaps also be
      applied beyond their regions. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">But more
      coordination of reconstruction activities is still needed. The example of
      Bosnia, where 450 international organizations and various NGOs are active,
      shows that coordination by the U.N. and the Senior Representative could be
      improved. Part of the problem is that all of the various organizations
      have different mandates: political, military, and humanitarian. This makes
      cohesion among political mediation, military and security operations,
      emergency aid, and development aid even more vital. </FONT> </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>THE
      ELEMENTS OF PEACE BUILDING</B></FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Successful
      peace building requires a clear idea about the society that needs to be
      built. In order to rebuild a war-torn nation, social and economic
      reconstruction, a secure environment for the population and the
      reinforcement of democracy are necessary. Active participation by local
      institutions is also important, because these are the very institutions
      that will run the country when the international community withdraws. When
      peace building is undertaken, attention to specific national circumstances
      is as important as the determination to adopt universal values. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Good
      government and democracy are the foundations of a stable and peaceful
      society. In areas outside Europe, the donor must not be obsessed with
      introducing a Western-style multiparty democracy. More important is the
      creation of conditions for the division of power; pluralism and
      proportionality in political decision-making; and anchoring the legal
      security of the individual in a democratic constitutional state. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">International
      support for the police and justice system of the country is essential for
      the restoration of the legal order. The Netherlands, therefore, advocates
      the foundation of a UN Standby Police Force which could play a major role
      in the peace-building phase with regard to the restoration and maintenance
      of the public order, the supervision of human rights violations and, if
      necessary, tracking down war criminals. In many peacekeeping operations,
      there is a shortage of international police advisors, observers and
      trainers. Donor countries are slow to make contributions from their civil
      police forces. Countries which have <I>gendarmerie, carabinieri, </I>or
      <I>marechaussee </I>organizations at their disposal can react more
      adequately. The combination of their military and police training has
      proved essential in Bosnia, Haiti and elsewhere. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>DEMARCATION
      OF CIMIC TASKS</B></FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">As I
      indicated, there is often only a thin line between civil and military aims
      during peacekeeping operations. Obviously, reconstruction activities
      should be carried out primarily by civil institutions. Still, there are
      certain tasks to which military organizations are more suited than civil
      organizations, due to their earlier presence, mobility, and equipment. An
      example is the contribution by the NATO Cimic forces to the civil
      reconstruction of Bosnia-Herzegovina. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">NATO is
      currently considering a structural expansion of its Cimic capacity. I
      welcome this initiative, but I also believe that some form of
      distinguishing among Cimic tasks is desirable. Cimic tasks should not
      obscure the fact that defense forces are first and foremost for the
      maintenance of peace. Moreover, certain Cimic tasks could endanger the
      impartiality of the peacekeeping force. We also should make sure that
      local authorities and international organizations do not become
      structurally dependent on the peace force&#146;s Cimic operations. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">The
      Netherlands is investigating whether we can contribute to the expansion of
      the NATO Cimic capability , for example, by providing a framework Cimic
      group as described in the Force Proposals for 1998. This Cimic capability
      can also contribute to operations in other contexts, such as UN
      peacekeeping operations which are based on the UN Standby Arrangements
      System (UNSAS) and, in the future, also the Standby Forces High Readiness
      Brigade (Shirbrig). </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>CONCLUSION</B></FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">It is clear
      that there are no easy answers with regard to peacebuilding, but we are
      learning with each experience. The lessons about the relationship between
      peace-building and peacekeeping may provide us with tools for durable
      peace in the next century. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">One thing is
      clear: peace-building requires patience, consistency and coordination.
      Long-term involvement is a precondition; attempts to force immediate
      results are doomed to fail. Better structured and more effective
      reconstruction is essential for societies that have been destroyed by war,
      civil war, collapse of government or harsh suppression. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">In Europe,
      Bosnia, Albania, Macedonia (FYROM) and the rest of the Balkan countries
      require our attention. Elsewhere, Afganistan, Ruanda, Sudan, Somalia,
      Liberia, and Haiti are currently examples of countries which require the
      attention of the world community in order to help create a more stable
      society by means of peace-building.</FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><A HREF="voorhoeve98.htm">Go to Top of Page</A><BR>
       </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><A HREF="workshop98.htm">Return to Vienna '98</A><BR>
       </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><A HREF="../index.html">Return to Home Page</A></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT">Copyright &copy; 1998 Center for Strategic Decision
      Research</P>
  </BODY>
</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021