KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/roger.dnai/98Book/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/roger.dnai/98Book/cheshire8.htm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad//DTD HoTMetaL PRO 4.0::19971010::extensions to HTML 4.0//EN"
 "hmpro4.dtd">

<HTML>
  
  <HEAD>
    <TITLE>Proceedings 98</TITLE>
  </HEAD>
  
  <BODY LINK="0000ff" BGPROPERTIES="FIXED" BGCOLOR="ffffff"><BASEFONT SIZE="3">
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="6" FACE="Palatino">Challenges
      of Instability for NATO<BR>
       In the Northwest Region </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Air Chief
      Marshal Sir John Cheshire KBE CBE</FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Commander-in-Chief
      Allied Forces Northwest Europe</FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">In addition
      to the ACE-wide challenges to stability that SACEUR and DSACEUR described
      in detail, there are three additional challenges that face us in the
      Northwest Region. &nbsp;While these concerns either do not exist on the
      doorstep of my MSC (Major Subordinate Commander) colleagues, or are
      significantly less prevalent for them, I would still like to focus your
      attention on them. </FONT> </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>PROXIMITY
      TO RUSSIA</B> </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">The first
      challenge stems from the fact that geopolitically Russia is the largest
      nation in our Area of Interest (AOI). &nbsp;Indeed there is a common
      border between Norway and Russia. &nbsp;While it is easy for those of us
      who live in the secure environment of Vienna, New York, Ottawa, or even
      London to play down the significance of that 196-km common border in
      Finmark, the inescapable fact is that it remains a major factor in the
      instability assessment made by my colleagues in Norway. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">For the same
      reason, all our partner nations in the Baltic area also are very sensitive
      to the importance of their individual and collective relationships with
      Russia, in the context of regional stability. &nbsp;It is logical that
      those nations in the Northwest Region that have a common border with
      Russia would be most sensitive to the issue of stability with Russia.
      </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Although
      this particular geopolitical issue is of course a <I>national</I>
      concern, the fact that it is also a <I>common</I> one for many of our
      NATO and partner nations in the Northwest Region leads those of us
      responsible for regional stability to take it just as seriously as the
      nations themselves. &nbsp;I should also say that anything that Russia
      regards as an instability issue, particularly in the Leningrad Military
      District (LMD), is of no less concern to us. </FONT> </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>NATO&#146;S
      ABILITY TO INFLUENCE REGIONAL STABILITY</B> </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">The second
      general point in the assessment of instability is how much NATO in
      general, and my Region in particular, can actually do to <I>influence</I>
      regional stability positively. &nbsp;It is, of course, obvious that we
      will do everything we can to enhance stability and reduce risks in our
      Region&#151;indeed that is a formal task given to us by the North Atlantic
      Council. &nbsp;The dilemma we face, however, is that, in practice, we have
      little direct influence over some of the issues that might actually
      trigger instability in our Area of Interest. &nbsp;Four examples of such
      issues are bilateral border disputes, disturbances over minority rights,
      internal political instability, and disputes over offshore resources.
      </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Potential
      triggers of this sort actually cause us the greatest concern, because they
      are the ones over which we have little influence and which could ignite
      regional instability rapidly. &nbsp;Such instability might, in turn,
      result in a request by a long-standing Partner nation for NATO military
      assistance. &nbsp;In short, in these situations we might be unable to
      prevent a fuse from being lit, but we might be called on to help contain
      the ensuing explosion. </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">We also
      recognize that NATO could, wholly unwittingly, aggravate the instability
      in the region, and we go to great lengths to avoid the possibility of that
      happening. &nbsp;For example, we recognize that we have to strike a very
      careful balance in our enhanced PFP program; a balance which, on the one
      hand, satisfies the increasing aspirations of the Baltic nations but, on
      the other, does not stray into areas that our Russian colleagues would
      regard as unacceptably destabilizing. </FONT> </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>Our
      Relationship With Russia</B> </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">As SACEUR&#146;s
      custodian of the defense guarantee in the Northwest Region, I should like
      to make three specific points about our relationship with the Russian
      military: </FONT></P>
    <UL>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">First and foremost,
        Russia poses no military threat to the Northwest Region. </FONT></LI>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Second, we go to great
        lengths to ensure that the Russian military is fully aware of all the
        PFP activities in our Region&#151;and why we are carrying them out and
        who is involved. &nbsp;Thanks to my good friend General Anatoly
        Krivolapov and his like-minded colleagues, I like to think that our
        activities are regarded as transparent, militarily sensible, and in the
        best interests of regional stability. &nbsp;I have little doubt that
        they would tell me if they regarded our activities otherwise. </FONT></LI>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">Third, the inescapable
        fact still remains that Russia retains sufficient military hardware in
        the Leningrad Military District to make life very uncomfortable for any
        of the nations in the Northwest Region&#146;s Area of Interest. &nbsp;And
        if there is substantial military hardware in the hands of one nation in
        our AOI, and if the political situation in that nation is in any way
        unpredictable, it would be militarily irresponsible to ignore the
        potential for the unexpected. &nbsp;We try to remain militarily
        responsible. </FONT></LI>
    </UL>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>THE
      EXISTENCE OF TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS</B> </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">A third
      potential trigger to instability in my Region is that Russia retains a
      substantial number of Tactical Nuclear Weapons (TNWs) in the Leningrad
      Military District. &nbsp;Our concern is not that Russia would contemplate
      using them against the nations in our Region. &nbsp;Rather, it is the risk
      that one (or more) of those weapons might get stolen. &nbsp;Were that to
      happen, and were the weapon to fall into the hands of extremists, then we
      would have to be prepared to handle the resulting potential for
      instability. </FONT> </P>
    
    <P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"><B>CONCLUDING
      REMARKS</B> </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">I have tried
      to highlight just some of the issues that could trigger instability in the
      Northwest Region. &nbsp;I want to emphasize that none of them are threats,
      in using the traditional definition, but that all of them could occur and
      would almost certainly do so with little or no warning. &nbsp;If any of
      them were to materialize, we would not underestimate the political and
      military consequences of NATO involvement in its aftermath.</FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><A HREF="cheshire8.htm">Go to Top of Page</A></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><A HREF="workshop98.htm">Return to Vienna '98</A></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><A HREF="../index.html">Return to Home Page</A></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino"></FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino"> </FONT></P>
    
    <P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="000000" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino"> </FONT></P>
  </BODY>
</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021