KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/roger.dnai/96Pictures/94Book/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/roger.dnai/96Pictures/94Book/Latta.htm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad//DTD HoTMetaL PRO 4.0::19971010::extensions to HTML 4.0//EN"
 "hmpro4.dtd">

<HTML>
  
  <HEAD>
    <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
    <META NAME="GENERATOR" 
    CONTENT="Mozilla/4.03 (Macintosh; I; 68K) [Netscape]">
    <TITLE>Russian General-Major Vasili Filipovich Latta...Implementation of
    the Partnership for Peace</TITLE>
  </HEAD>
  
  <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" BGPROPERTIES="FIXED">
    <CENTER><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+4">Implementation of the
    Partnership for Peace</FONT></FONT></CENTER>
    <CENTER><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+3">General-Major Vasili
    Filipovich Latta</FONT></FONT></CENTER>
    <CENTER><I><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+2">Russian Ministry of
    Defense</FONT></FONT></I></CENTER>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">RUSSIAN PARTICIPATION
    IN THE PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Great attention was focused
      during the NATO Workshop on the specific conditions or status attached to
      Russia's participation in the Partnership for Peace program. For me, there
      are no convincing arguments about why particular conditions or a special
      status should be necessary. Keeping other Partners from being offended is
      certainly not a viable argument. I would also question whether it is fair,
      as is now proposed, that only the 16 NATO members should decide all issues
      concerning Central and Eastern Europe without allowing Russia or other
      Partnership members the right of veto. We must think about this. Clearly,
      we do not want to distort the idea of partnership--an idea based on the
      participation of members that are equal in all respects, not on the notion
      that some members are leaders and others outsiders.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">No one doubts that the
      Partnership for Peace program, as it has been proposed, cannot exist
      without Russia. This is an objective reality. Russia has already decided
      to join the program, as was announced by our Minister of Foreign Affairs
      and our Defense Minister. It was also announced that Russia will sign the
      Partnership for Peace Framework Document in mid-summer of 1994 and that it
      will simultaneously present its own initiatives about a common
      Euro-Atlantic partnership. We intend to reach a full-scale agreement with
      NATO, after high-level discussions and negotiations on our initiatives and
      the Partnership parameters have taken place. I cannot understand why this
      might cause confusion and why particular conditions must be met.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING
    RUSSIAN PARTICIPATION</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Russia does not want to join the
      Partnership for Peace program as it formally stands. It wants to
      participate on a wider scale, in accordance with its own status,
      capabilities, and obligations and in respect of principles that would
      ensure that:</FONT></FONT> </P>
    <UL>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Russia can defend all of its
        national interests.</FONT></FONT></LI>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Russia's participation in the
        Partnership program would not exclude the prospect of creating systems
        of collective security in the Asia-Pacific ocean region or Russia's
        participation in them.</FONT></FONT></LI>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Russia would be able to
        develop bilateral consultations with other states and program members
        about national security problems.</FONT></FONT></LI>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">The Partnership would take
        into consideration the role of the Commonwealth of Independent States
        (CIS) and Russia's regional obligations in the CIS collective security
        system.</FONT></FONT></LI>
    </UL>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">These principles form the basis
      of Russia's participation in the Partnership for Peace and of its
      full-scale cooperation with NATO militarily and in other important
      sectors. It is along these lines that the parameters for Russia's
      practical participation in the program were presented in Brussels. They
      include:</FONT></FONT> </P>
    <UL>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">On a political scale--the
        development of a working mechanism for consultation at all levels about
        security problems.</FONT></FONT></LI>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">On a military
        scale--cooperation with NATO and Partnership members in such areas as
        coordination of common military activity, peacekeeping operations,
        transparency and openness in the field of military planning, and
        personnel preparation and training.</FONT></FONT></LI>
      <LI><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">The possibility of developing
        Partner relations in the areas of disarmament; control of armament
        conversions; non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical, and biological
        weapons; and environmental problems.</FONT></FONT></LI>
    </UL>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">CONCLUSION</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Let me say in conclusion that my
      country is ready to have within the NATO structure its own working group
      or its own representatives to decide on all questions that concern
      Russia's practical participation in the Partnership program. I will be
      very happy if my NATO Workshop address has convinced even a few people
      that, when Russia speaks about its interest in a wider-scale partnership
      than the one proposed in the PFP, we do not seek privileged status. We are
      only concerned about the essence of this partnership, so that all states,
      West and East, can share the same degree of interest in the development of
      its program.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0"><A HREF="Latta.htm" TARGET="_document">Go
        to Top of Page</A></FONT></FONT> <BR><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0"><A HREF="/94Book/94Workshop.htm">Return
        to Os '94 Page</A></FONT></FONT> <BR><A HREF="../index.html">Return to Home Page</A> </P>
    
    <P><FONT SIZE="+1">&nbsp;</FONT>   </P>
  </BODY>
</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021