KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/roger.dnai/96Book/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/roger.dnai/96Book/Solana.htm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad//DTD HoTMetaL PRO 4.0::19971010::extensions to HTML 4.0//EN"
 "hmpro4.dtd">

<HTML>
  
  <HEAD>
    <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
    <META NAME="GENERATOR" 
    CONTENT="Mozilla/4.04 (Macintosh; U; 68K) [Netscape]">
    <TITLE>NATO Secretary General Javier Solana...NATO: Towards the 21st
    Century</TITLE>
  </HEAD>
  
  <BODY>
    <CENTER><FONT SIZE="+4">NATO: Towards the 21st Century</FONT></CENTER>
    <CENTER><FONT SIZE="+3">NATO Secretary General Javier Solana</FONT>
    </CENTER>
    
    <P>The theme of this year's Workshop is &quot;The Future of NATO.&quot;
      Nothing could be more appropriate, since NATO is currently engaged in
      generating new ideas and fresh approaches to make it effective and
      relevant in the 21st century. Looking back at our Ministerial meetings in
      June, I would say that the future of NATO is being made here and now. The
      decisions we have made will have a profound effect on NATO's evolution.
      And they show a NATO with more to do than ever, and a NATO determined to
      be fit to meet the challenge. I would like to take a few moments now to
      review what we are doing. </P>
    <CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+1">IMPLEMENTING IFOR</FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P>Let me first mention NATO's most pressing current priority, which is the
      IFOR operation in Bosnia. Because of IFOR, this past spring has been the
      first in four years that has not brought with it a major military
      offensive in Bosnia. The Peace Agreement is now in its sixth month, and
      NATO's vital role in leading the Implementation Force has helped both keep
      and build the peace there. </P>
    
    <P>In our Ministerial meetings, NATO has sent a clear signal that we remain
      determined to do the job in Bosnia--and do it well. We will maintain IFOR
      at roughly its present strength right up to and during the elections in
      September. These elections are the Bosnian people's chance, at last, to
      have their say. It is their chance to affirm that they wish to see Bosnia
      develop positively and peacefully and to build a permanent peace together.
      This is essential for the future of Bosnia. The elections will enable the
      establishment of the common political institutions the country urgently
      needs to overcome its divisions, both visible and invisible. </P>
    
    <P>In addition to maintaining IFOR's strength through the elections, we
      have also decided to maintain IFOR's overall capability until the end of
      its mandate in December. However, it is up to the parties themselves to
      pursue the long-term process of reconciliation and to recognize that peace
      is the only viable option, and that compliance with the Peace Agreement is
      the means of achieving it. The challenges are immense, and it will take
      the full effort and commitment of all concerned to make our vision for
      Bosnia succeed. In the crucial months ahead, the international community
      can and must do its part to assist, but the parties themselves must take
      on the responsibility of making peace work. </P>
    
    <P>To me, the significance of IFOR transcends Bosnia. The extraordinary
      cooperation embodied in the force reflects a new and unprecedented spirit
      of cooperation across Europe. In my visits to Bosnia, I have been
      immensely impressed and inspired by what I have seen of the IFOR
      operation. Take, for example, the Nordic-Polish brigade. It brings
      together the Scandinavian countries, the Baltic countries, and Poland in a
      unique demonstration of practical cooperation. Americans and Russians,
      too, are working side by side, frequently going out on joint patrols
      together. </P>
    
    <P>These cooperative ventures are just a few examples of a new dynamic, a
      new mentality at work in Europe. Never before has there been such
      extensive military cooperation on this continent. And never before, when
      conflicts have arisen in the Balkans, have so many countries been on the
      same side--the side of peace. IFOR is the model of an undivided Europe at
      work; it is a model for the future, from which we must all learn and on
      which we must build. </P>
    <CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+1">STRENGTHENING PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE</FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P>The creation of IFOR owes a great deal to the Partnership for Peace
      initiative. Without PFP it would not have been possible to assemble such a
      large coalition so rapidly and so effectively. Within two years, PFP has
      turned into the most ambitious military-cooperation program in Europe. It
      has created momentum that we need to keep up. </P>
    
    <P>Thus, in our meetings, we agreed to further strengthen the Partnership.
      In the short term, this will be achieved by deepening the Planning and
      Review Process and through our work on civil-military relations. In the
      longer term, we envisage a stronger role for Partners in shaping PFP
      programs. So PFP is here to stay--as a means to prepare with our Partners
      for peacekeeping operations, to prepare those countries who wish to join
      NATO, and to further deepen our cooperation with those countries not
      planning to join NATO soon or at all. </P>
    <CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+1">STRENGTHENING NATO</FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P>We have also made major decisions designed to strengthen NATO through
      the fundamental adaptation of our internal structures. This work will be
      guided by three objectives: first, to ensure a more flexible, more
      effective NATO with the capabilities it needs for its traditional
      mission--collective defense--and its new missions of crisis management and
      peacekeeping; second, to preserve the transatlantic link; and third, to
      build a European Security and Defense Identity within the Alliance. All
      Allies are agreed on the importance of these objectives, and on the fact
      that they are fully compatible with each other. </P>
    
    <P>One important means to help us achieve these objectives is Combined
      Joint Task Forces concept, which we have completed in Berlin. This concept
      will: </P>
    <UL>
      <LI>Permit a more flexible and mobile deployment of forces, including
        forces for new missions</LI>
      <LI>Enable the use of separable but not separate military capabilities in
        operations led by the Western European Union (WEU)</LI>
      <LI>Facilitate the participation of nations outside the Alliance in
        operations such as IFOR</LI>
    </UL>
    
    <P>A key aspect of the adaptation we are engaged in is the reflection of a
      European Security and Defense Identity the Alliance. We will develop
      command arrangements to permit all European Allies to play a larger role
      in NATO's military and command structures, allowing Europe to assume more
      responsibility and share Alliance burdens more equitably. With the
      approval of all 16 Allies, NATO assets and capabilities will be made
      available to the WEU. We will now get on with the work of making these
      arrangements a reality. </P>
    
    <P>We will also remain firmly on course for the enlargement of NATO.
      Opening NATO is part of a wider process of the natural growing together of
      Europe. It will not create dividing lines or isolate any country. On the
      contrary, our goal remains establishing ever closer and deeper cooperative
      ties with our Partner countries. In fact, opening the Alliance would mean
      continuing an artificial demarcation that no longer corresponds to
      European realities. As I said in Warsaw during a visit in April: after
      1945, when Western Europe was given another chance, it was given an
      Atlantic chance. The same chance, not a lesser imitation of it, should now
      be given to the new democracies to NATO's east. </P>
    
    <P>But opening NATO to the east will be neither easy nor cost free. The
      current NATO Allies must thoroughly assess the impact new members will
      have on the political and military structures of the Alliance. And those
      aspiring to become members must thoroughly reflect on membership's
      implications for their own political and military environment, and how
      they see themselves contributing to the overall security of the Allies.
    </P>
    
    <P>That is why we are currently involved in an intensive dialogue with
      those countries that have expressed an interest in joining NATO. In
      December, our Foreign Ministers will assess the results and decide the
      next step. In short, the process of NATO's opening is on track. </P>
    <CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+1">BUILDING A STRONG NATO-RUSSIA RELATIONSHIP</FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P>A wider NATO will be part of a Europe in which a democratic Russia has a
      rightful place. Thus, while we are responding to the legitimate
      expectations of Central Europe to be integrated into the Euro-Atlantic
      security structure, we also want to address the concerns of Russia and to
      build a strong, lasting NATO-Russia relationship. We want to embed this
      relationship deeply into the new security structure in Europe. </P>
    
    <P>The success of NATO-Russia cooperation in Bosnia provides an excellent
      foundation for our work. Also, in recent months, we have held important
      consultations with Russia on issues such as the former Yugoslavia, the
      proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and the CFE Treaty. But NATO
      wants to do much more. At the 16+1 meeting in Berlin with Russian Foreign
      Minister Primakov in June, we reiterated our proposal to form a political
      framework for NATO-Russia relations. </P>
    
    <P>The fact that our proposals for intensifying the NATO-Russia
      relationship are being examined carefully and with interest gives us cause
      for optimism. I firmly believe that NATO and Russia make headway in
      establishing a strong, stable, and enduring partnership that properly
      recognizes our common interest in security and stability on our continent.
      Our successful cooperation in IFOR shows the way. </P>
    
    <P>We also intend to deepen our cooperation Ukraine. Over the past six
      months, this cooperation has intensified through the implementation of the
      document on enhanced NATO/Ukraine relations that we agreed to last
      September, and also through Ukraine's participation in IFOR. </P>
    <CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+1">CONCLUSION</FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P>As you can see, our Ministerial meetings have opened a bold new chapter
      in the life of the Atlantic Alliance. Through our strong transatlantic
      partnership, we are working hard to: </P>
    <UL>
      <LI>Make our Alliance stronger and more effective in order to carry out
        its full range of missions</LI>
      <LI>Develop a European Security and Defense Identity within the Alliance</LI>
      <LI>Continue the process of opening the Alliance to new members</LI>
      <LI>Strengthen our cooperation with all Partner countries, including
        Russia and Ukraine</LI>
    </UL>
    
    <P>With our Alliance thus renewed, we will be able to face the challenges
      of the 21st century with confidence. </P>
    
    <P><A HREF="Solana.htm">Go to top of page</A> <BR><A HREF="Workshop96.htm">Return to Warsaw '96</A> <BR><A HREF="../index.html">Return to Home Page</A> </P>
  </BODY>
</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021