KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/roger.dnai/95Book/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/roger.dnai/95Book/Claes.htm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad//DTD HoTMetaL PRO 4.0::19971010::extensions to HTML 4.0//EN"
 "hmpro4.dtd">

<HTML>
  
  <HEAD>
    <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
    <META NAME="GENERATOR" 
    CONTENT="Mozilla/4.03 (Macintosh; I; 68K) [Netscape]">
    <TITLE>NATO Secretary General Willy Claes...NATO and European Security</TITLE>
  </HEAD>
  
  <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" BGPROPERTIES="FIXED">
    <CENTER><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+4">NATO and European Security</FONT></FONT></CENTER>
    <CENTER><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+3">NATO Secretary General
    Willy Claes</FONT></FONT></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">This year's NATO Workshop is the
      first at which I am able to speak in my role as Secretary General,
      although the dynamism and creativity of the Workshops are well known.
      While it is rare that politicians, officials, and business people come
      together informally to discuss and exchange views on the topics we are
      considering, when they do the results are always valuable. Therefore, I am
      grateful for the opportunity to address such a wide and influential group
      as the Workshop, and I hope my remarks are able to spark its discussions.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">I believe that NATO is entering
      one of the most crucial periods of its history. I say this in a positive
      sense. Four years ago, we agreed on a new Strategic Concept for our forces
      and set out a policy of cooperation and partnership with our new friends
      in Central and Eastern Europe. We can see now how far-sighted and
      far-reaching these decisions were. Today, we are reaping what we sowed
      then. It is a fine harvest.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">I would like to direct my
      remarks to three key issues: NATO's relations with Partnership for Peace
      (PFP) Partners; the European security and defense identity; and the
      current situation in the former Yugoslavia. These topics will define, I
      believe, the character of the European security environment into the next
      century.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">NATO'S RELATIONS WITH
    ITS PARTNERS</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">When I assumed office last year,
      I said that NATO's first task should be to extend stability eastward. Our
      main instrument for doing this is our practical cooperation programs with
      our Partners. In the past four years, we have seen a growing
      intensification of NATO's outreach. We started with dialogue, moved into
      cooperation through the North Atlantic Cooperation Council and Partnership
      for Peace, and are now heading for enlargement.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Partnership for Peace in
      particular has given new dynamism and direction to our cooperation. The
      program, which includes 26 Partners of widely varying security backgrounds
      and aims, has already become a milestone in the realization of our
      ambition of a stable and cooperative Europe. As such, it is truly a
      strategic initiative.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">As we move toward enlarging the
      Alliance, the importance of PFP will increase, not decrease, because the
      program is both a means to prepare countries to join NATO and a strong
      link to the Alliance for those countries not likely to join NATO soon. The
      fact that Russia has agreed to go forward with its Individual Partnership
      Program confirms the long-term importance of PFP for the development of
      NATO's relations with Russia as well.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">We want Russia to develop in a
      positive, democratic way, even though this may take a long time and
      involve great difficulties. A democratic Russia with a developed free
      market economy will be a significant plus for European security. As part
      of the legacy of the Cold War, there is still some distrust in Russia of
      the West, distrust that could be exploited by factions that wish to
      recreate Russia's authoritarian and assertive past. We believe that the
      closer our consultation and cooperation with Russia become--and I am
      convinced they will become closer--the less room there will be for
      mistrust and misunderstanding.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">When we agreed with Russia
      recently to move ahead with PFP, we also agreed to implement an ambitious
      program beyond PFP. In addition, NATO Foreign Ministers offered to
      initiate a dialogue on the future direction that our relationship should
      take. We hope to achieve by the end of this year a political framework for
      NATO-Russia relations, elaborating basic principles for security
      cooperation as well as for the development of mutual political
      consultations.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">We are also moving steadily
      towards another phase in NATO's relationship with Partners: the admission
      of new members. Last December we began a study to determine how NATO will
      enlarge and to explain why it should enlarge. This study will be completed
      as scheduled this autumn. Partners will be briefed on the conclusions and
      respond before NATO Foreign Ministers meet in Brussels in December.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Our objective is to enhance
      security for all countries in Europe, without creating new dividing lines.
      As a result, admission of new members will come at the end of an open,
      gradual, and transparent process. No new members have yet been designated:
      much work, both by Allies and Partners, must be done before we get to that
      stage. When it does happen, NATO's enlargement will not represent an
      isolated development, but be part of a wider context in which Partnership
      for Peace is a permanent fixture in European security cooperation, and in
      which NATO itself continues to change and adapt.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">NATO's enlargement will also
      complement the enlargement of the European Union (EU). These parallel
      enlargement processes will contribute significantly to extending security
      and stability to the new democracies in Central and Eastern Europe. For
      the first time in their history, these countries can look forward to being
      part of functioning, successful political, economic, and security systems.
      This participation will give them the confidence and incentive needed to
      complete their transition to modern, economically and politically dynamic
      societies under the rule of law.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">NATO AND THE EUROPEAN
    SECURITY AND DEFENSE IDENTITY</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">NATO has already played an
      indispensable role in the European integration process. For over four
      decades, the organization has provided a protective umbrella for a Western
      Europe striving towards economic and, eventually, political union.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Today, the European Union is a
      reality, and now is in the process of developing a distinct common foreign
      and security policy. Our goal is to continue to foster Europe's
      integration, not by protecting, as we did, the EU's early growth, but by
      furthering its development so there is an efficient use of resources and
      preservation of the transatlantic link. That is why the NATO Summit
      leaders in January 1994 supported the emergence of a European security and
      defense identity.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">NATO is more than an interested
      spectator in this process. A strong European defense pillar allows for a
      more appropriate sharing of burdens across the Atlantic. We are in the
      process of examining how our structures should be changed to reflect the
      reality of a more ambitious Europe concerning its security. At the NATO
      Summit, our leaders offered to make NATO assets available through the
      Western European Union (WEU). And, together with the WEU, we are working
      on the concept of Combined Joint Task Forces that could be used for crisis
      response by NATO or the WEU. Of course, any European decision to act
      drawing on Alliance assets would be subject to decisions within the
      Alliance. In this way, we would retain the effective transatlantic
      framework that has secured our interests so successfully and strengthen
      the European pillar of the Alliance.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">SITUATION IN THE FORMER
    YUGOSLAVIA</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">I believe that today we are
      entering a new phase in the conflict in this area. I hesitate to use the
      phrase &quot;turning point&quot; because, as yet, we cannot see any
      indication that those fighting on the ground, particularly the Bosnian
      Serbs, see any point in making peace. Peace will come only when the
      prospective gains from a peace settlement and the horrendous costs of
      continued fighting convince the conflicting parties that war is not a
      viable option. I do not think we have reached that point yet.
      Nevertheless, with the large-scale taking of hostages and the U.N. Rapid
      Reaction Force, the nature of the U.N. presence in the area is changing.
      Faced with a choice of withdrawal or continuation, countries that have
      contributed troops have decided to stay and to reinforce U.N. Protection
      Forces (UNPROFOR), always under the U.N. mandate. Once U.N. peace forces
      are capable of defending themselves and demonstrate that they cannot be
      manipulated or intimidated, the Bosnian Serbs will realize, we hope, the
      hopelessness and futility of their position. Then they will, as the
      Americans say, stop calling the shots.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">When the Bosnian Serbs took U.N.
      hostages and shot at NATO aircraft, they grossly miscalculated. I hope
      that they are beginning to realize this and to get a glimpse of their own
      weakness. By persisting in their mission, the U.N. will provide a powerful
      signal to the Bosnian Serbs and the other warring parties that they have
      no option except to resume peace negotiations on the basis of the Contact
      Group plan. Recognition of Bosnia-Herzegovina by Serbia will further
      isolate the Bosnian Serbs. In our policy towards Bosnia, all arguments
      point to persistence, rather than withdrawal.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">CONCLUSION</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">While we are now reaping the
      harvest we sowed a few years ago, we are not forgetting to plant seeds for
      a future harvest. We have just opened a dialogue with several
      Mediterranean countries to exchange ideas and perspectives. This is likely
      to grow in significance. We are also stepping up our work on
      nonproliferation, both in the political and defense spheres. The Alliance
      will remain one that can defend its members against threats to their
      security. Careful preparation now will save us from intimidation later.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">None of this would be possible,
      of course, without a strong transatlantic link. It is clear that North
      American commitment to Europe is as necessary today as ever before. In
      economic and cultural terms, the U.S. and Canada are inextricably linked
      with Europe. Under NATO's umbrella, Western Europe and North America have
      developed a level of interdependence and mutual support that is
      unparalleled elsewhere in the world. With the opening up of Central and
      Eastern Europe, U.S. involvement in Europe continues to grow.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Whatever may develop in the
      years to come, there is one certainty: NATO will remain the main
      institutional anchor for a United States presence in and a commitment to
      Europe. The Alliance is an irreplaceable forum for transatlantic
      consultations; its unique combination of political and military experience
      and expertise means that it will remain the prime security forum of the
      Allies. What counts in the final analysis is that North Americans and
      Europeans continue to need each other and see immense benefit in their
      strong transatlantic link, which is embodied in the Alliance.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0"><A HREF="Claes.htm">Go to Top
        of Page</A></FONT></FONT> <BR><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0"><A HREF="95Workshop.htm">Return
        to Dresden '95 Page</A></FONT></FONT> <BR><A HREF="../index.html">Return to Home Page</A>   </P>
  </BODY>
</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021