KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/roger.dnai/95Book/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/roger.dnai/95Book/Birkavs.htm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad//DTD HoTMetaL PRO 4.0::19971010::extensions to HTML 4.0//EN"
 "hmpro4.dtd">

<HTML>
  
  <HEAD>
    <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
    <META NAME="GENERATOR" 
    CONTENT="Mozilla/4.03 (Macintosh; I; 68K) [Netscape]">
    <TITLE>Latvian Vice Prime Minister Dr. Valdis Birkavs...Cooperation in the
    Northern Region and the Baltics</TITLE>
  </HEAD>
  
  <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" BGPROPERTIES="FIXED">
    <CENTER><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+4">Cooperation in the Northern
    Region</FONT></FONT></CENTER>
    <CENTER><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+4">And the Baltics</FONT></FONT></CENTER>
    <CENTER><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+3">LatvianVice Prime Minister
    and Foreign Minister Dr. Valdis Birkavs</FONT></FONT></CENTER>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">INTRODUCTION</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Last year I addressed the 11th
      NATO Workshop posing this question: Will the Partnership for Peace (PFP)
      produce the kind of Baltic security we want to see at the end of this
      decade? One year later, the answer is still uncertain. Latvia continues to
      be concerned about two regional security issues: first, the pattern of
      regional cooperation, and second, the progress of efforts to integrate
      economically into the EU and to extend long-term security arrangements
      eastward.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">ASSESSMENT OF THE
    REGIONAL SECURITY SETTING</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Global cooperation stems from
      regional arrangements. A Baltic regional security setting must be analyzed
      in a broader context, both as a constituency of the European security
      architecture and as a contributor to global security and stability. The
      two basic institutions that shape the Atlantic relationship, NATO and the
      European Union, have adapted to the realities of the post-Cold War world.
      Today we speak about new roles and missions for NATO. The European Union
      now focuses on the political and economic dimensions of security in
      current circumstances, while European and Atlantic dimensions remain
      closely linked.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">One circumstance that makes it
      possible to contribute and to strengthen the Euro-Atlantic community is
      the projection of the transatlantic dimension, namely, U.S. commitment to
      the security of Northern-Baltic Europe. This remains of fundamental
      importance. In the regional setting, the transatlantic dimension is
      provided through the new NATO.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">A second circumstance that
      supports the Euro-Atlantic community is the emergence of a reinforced
      European security and defense identity through the EU and the Western
      European Union. Latvia's Associate Partner status in the WEU reflects our
      support.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">PARTNERSHIP:
    EXPERIENCES AND PERSPECTIVES</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">At the NATO ministerial meeting
      in Istanbul, U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher noted that
      Partnership for Peace was intended &quot;to reassure new democracies and
      strengthen European security.&quot; PFP's objective is to promote both
      national and coalition efforts toward reform and collaboration.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">On the national level, the
      Partnership process seeks to promote openness in defense planning and
      budgeting. On the coalition level, the Partnership has launched an effort
      to develop joint planning, training, and exercise initiatives in order to
      undertake a range of combined operations, including peacekeeping, search
      and rescue, and humanitarian relief.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">The PFP program seeks to go
      beyond dialogue and cooperation--already achieved in the OSCE process--and
      forge a true security partnership. Such a partnership has already evolved
      among five Scandinavian countries and three Baltic States. This kind of
      horizontal cooperation within the PFP framework makes a substantial
      contribution to the development of military establishments in the Baltics.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Individual Partnership Programs
      specify activities in which a particular Partner nation intends to
      participate. In effect, each Partner develops a unique, independent
      program matching its participation, integration, and activity objectives.
      Among other initiatives, Latvia has proposed that several units be
      prepared for possible deployment in future peacekeeping operations. Those
      units are an infantry company, which is part of a reconnaissance landing
      force battalion; Latvian elements of the BALTBAT peacekeeping battalion;
      and units of our military medics services. These units are being trained
      and prepared and will be ready for operations as of the beginning of 1997.
      We expect that our endeavors for PFP will be useful and effective.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">NEW TRENDS: PROCESSES
    AND STRUCTURES</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Currently, the Alliance is
      seeking to define what constitutes a Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF). A
      single, unified vision is needed if we are to gear training, exercises,
      doctrine development, and combined operational procedures toward the
      objective of conducting coherent, multilateral actions. Therefore, we must
      focus future Alliance exercises on preparing the forces of potential
      participating nations--including Partners for Peace--for effective
      integration into CJTF.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">From my perspective, a Combined
      Joint Task Force is both a process and a structure. As a process, it
      equips the Alliance to assemble and groom forces to operate together. As a
      structure, it provides a command and control architecture for NATO to
      direct and employ a combined operation. It enables NATO member-nations to
      deal effectively with issues that fall outside of the Alliance's
      traditional boundaries; moreover, it provides a mechanism through which
      both NATO and non-NATO nations can participate in expanded coalition
      activities.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">The need for what CJTF offers is
      beyond dispute. It will transform existing NATO structures and processes
      to carry out the responsibilities outlined in the New Strategic Concept.
      Indeed, change is inevitable. But the real issue is how such change will
      take place. I believe that it will take place by implementing the CJTF
      concept, and that it is in this way that PFP offers the most promise for
      the future.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">Ongoing discussion concerning
      the expansion of NATO, both among NATO nations and among PFP Partners, has
      already resulted in the proposal of several intermediary solutions, such
      as guaranties outside of NATO and associated status with NATO. Though we
      are prepared to cooperate in generating new ideas, we do not regard any
      proposed solutions thus far as a substitute for full NATO membership.</FONT></FONT>
    </P>
    <CENTER></CENTER>
    <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+1">CONCLUDING REMARKS</FONT></FONT></B></CENTER>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0">The challenge today is to create
      mechanisms and relationships that will provide the community of
      responsible nations with the means to promote stability, resolve
      conflicts, and shape the future. Both processes and structures that will
      enable the international community to work together are needed. While the
      most dramatic period is probably behind us, dynamic change is likely to
      continue for years to come. Collective action offers opportunities to find
      a way through the new complexities and to ensure overall geopolitical
      balance.</FONT></FONT> </P>
    
    <P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0"><A HREF="Birkavs.htm">Go to Top
        of Page</A></FONT></FONT> <BR><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE="+0"><A HREF="95Workshop.htm">Return
        to Dresden '95 Page</A></FONT></FONT> <BR><A HREF="../index.html">Return to Home Page</A>   </P>
  </BODY>
</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021