KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/roger.dnai/2000Book/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/roger.dnai/2000Book/2000_chap25.htm
<HTML>

<HEAD>
<TITLE>2000 Book</TITLE>
</HEAD>

<BODY LINK="#0000ff" BGPROPERTIES="FIXED" BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<BASEFONT SIZE="3">
<HR SIZE="2"><P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="7" FACE="Palatino">
Chapter 25<FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" FACE="TIMES" SIZE="4"></FONT>
</FONT></P><HR SIZE="2">
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="5" FACE="Palatino">
An Industry Perspective on DCI and ESDI
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">
Mr. William Lawler<BR>
Vice President, Boeing Military Aircraft and Missiles
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
<BR>
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
<BR>
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
<FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Palatino" SIZE="7">I</FONT>t is a real privilege for the Boeing Company&#151;and for me personally&#151; to
 participate in this very timely and important forum. We welcome the opportunity
 to discuss NATO military/industrial affairs, and to share our thoughts
 on where, as an industry, we should be going. Such a discussion is important
 because we industrialists are not just competitors. We are often partners
 and sometimes buyers or sellers. But whatever role we play in any given
 business venture, we continue to have one vital interest in common, and
 that is the environment in which we do our business.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
This environment, that has been so stable for so long, is changing profoundly,
 and at a rate we would have considered inconceivable even two years ago.
 We received a reminder very recently of just how dynamic our environment
 can be with the announcement of the U.S. Defense Trade Security Initiative.
 Some believed that in the year 2000 it would be America&#146;s turn to move
 transatlantic cooperation forward, particularly regarding its export control
 policies. And now it appears that the United States has taken an important
 step, in the form of the 17 proposals within the Defense Trade Security
 Initiative. We applaud this action and look forward to working with our
 customers in implementing the details of those 17 proposals.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">
<B>SEEKING SOLUTIONS THROUGH DCI AND ESDI</B>
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
Regarding the Defense Capabilities Initiative (DCI) and the European Security
 and Defense Identity (ESDI), I believe they are sound, insightful steps
 to ensure that NATO and the European Union maintain their relevance and
 leadership by assuring the security of their members. DCI is positive proof
 that NATO has studied the data regarding the dynamic and complex factors
 it is facing in today&#146;s post-Cold War period. These factors include the
 changing nature of the threat to NATO members, new and varied missions
 that NATO must be prepared to fulfill, lessons learned from Kosovo, and
 the complex relationship between NATO and the European Union. And ESDI
 is the framework within which we must seek solutions to future needs. The
 European vision, with its particular integrated security requirements,
 is rapidly becoming reality, and we should all be encouraged by the dialogue
 on how these requirements are being meshed with those of NATO.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
So this is our challenge: satisfying these objectives in an environment
 of consolidation. I believe we may well have reached a historic fork in
 the road, and I sincerely hope that we have begun taking the first steps
 down the best road for us all. One path leads through greatly enhanced
 transatlantic cooperation in requirements development and systems acquisition
 on its way to improving interoperability and value. The other path leads
 through protectionism to a fortress mentality in which efficiency and effectiveness
 are subordinated to national and regional considerations.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
The Defense Capabilities Initiative, now bolstered by the streamlined procedures
 and efficiencies of the proposed Defense Trade Security Initiative, points
 the way forward. It identifies the direction in which the Alliance needs
 to move regarding capacity and capability without placing constraints on
 the particular systems to be acquired, be they airlifts, precision-guided
 munitions, command-and-control capabilities, or other systems.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
ESDI sets forth a process to help industry work through the complex relationships
 between Alliance members on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as with
 other members of the European community who are not members of the Alliance.
 Lord Robertson has been diligent in speaking out about these initiatives
 in recent months. To borrow his words, &#147;For Europe and for NATO to be credible,
 security goals must be met with real capability.&#148; And, to take it a step
 further, solid agreements on capability can lead to the establishment of
 real military requirements.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="3" FACE="Palatino">
<B>TAKING A MULTINATIONAL, CUSTOMER-ORIENTED APPROACH</B>
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
We in industry have the <I>opportunity</I> and, I submit, the <I>obligation</I> to propose
 solutions to DCI requirements that make operational, political, and industrial
 sense in light of ESDI, and that still meet the yardsticks of interoperability
 and value that we have talked about in previous sessions. We should do
 so by working side by side to propose optimal solutions in whatever contractual
 relationships best meet a particular need or requirement, and in such a
 way that we combine our strengths for the good of the Alliance. In the
 near term, the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is an outstanding example of
 a multinational approach that is required in our industry. Eight NATO nations
 are involved with JSF, and that&#146;s just the beginning. For example, I can
 imagine such jointly designed and produced systems as heavy-lift helicopters,
 airlifters, and next-generation, precision-guided weapons to meet the future
 needs of the Alliance. An entirely new field that we could also develop
 together is unmanned combat aircraft, and there are many others. The Alliance
 and its governments will need to play a role in structuring these activities
 to ensure a competitive environment and a level playing field.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
Defense companies around the world will provide the best capabilities and
 the best value when they are allowed to use the goals of customer satisfaction
 and stakeholder value, and have only minimal essential government regulation
 and limitations, to make their decisions. In fact, individual governments,
 NATO, and industry share the responsibility of working together to make
 sure we get the most value for our increasingly scarce resources. It remains
 a challenging task, but industry rationalization, these new initiatives,
 and the Defense Trade Security Initiative have surely rendered possible
 what may have been simply too difficult before.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
In the words of U.S. Under Secretary of Defense David Oliver, this is not
 about trade, it is about <I>increased security</I> for Allies on both sides of
 the Atlantic. It is not about losing export controls, but about <I>enhancing
 national security by improving interoperability</I>.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
We applaud NATO&#146;s initiative in setting a course for the new century. As
 we move forward, we would all do well to keep Lord Robertson&#146;s three I&#146;s
 in mind: <I>inclusiveness</I> of all NATO Allies, <I>indivisibility</I> of the transatlantic
 link, and <I>improvement</I> of capabilities.
</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="LEFT"><FONT COLOR="#1f1a17" SIZE="2" FACE="Palatino">
If we do our jobs right, the security benefits for NATO&#151;and the economic
 opportunities for its member-countries&#151;will continue to grow. And, most
 importantly, we will be doing our best for the men and women who rely on
 our products and services with their lives on the line. That remains our
 highest responsibility, and our greatest privilege.
</FONT></P>
<P>

</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><A HREF="workshop2000-A.htm">Back to 2000 Workshop Index</a></P></BODY>

</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021