KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/markrose/board/messages/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/markrose/board/messages/467.html
<html><head><title>Language evolution and the ic&euml;lani</title></head>

<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">

<center><h1><!--title-->Language evolution and the ic&euml;lani
</h1></center>

<hr size=7 width=75>
<p>Posted by <b><!--poster-->Hans-Werner Hatting</b>
on <!--date-->15:38 7/16/02
<p>In reply to: <a href="462.html">Language evolution and the ic&euml;lani</a> posted by Luca Mangiat</b>  on 22:12 7/9/02


<!-- PUT MESSAGE HERE -->
<p>
Mark wrote:
<blockquote>
"at least, I've never heard of a natural language with completely free
morpheme order. I'd want to know what stylistic or semantic effect the
variious orders have, though."
</blockquote>

<p>I also don't know about such a language. What we can find is movable
morphemes, which can attach themselves to different elements of the
sentence. An example is the Polish conjuctive marker "-by-", which can be
attached either to the verb, or to a sentence-initial element (mostly a
conjunction):
<br>/(a) jezelibym wiedzial = (b) jezeli wiedzialbym/ " if I had known"
<br>(Polish readers, please excuse my omission of diacritics). Both (a) and (b)
are wide-spread in contemporary  Polish.
<p>Russian "by" works in a similar way, of course without personal endings.
Another case are the personal endings of the past tense, which also can be
attached to sentence-initial conjunctions (from a poem):
<br>(a) /gdys szeptala mi slowa tesknoty/ = (b)/gdy szeptalas mi slowa tesknoty/
"when you whispered to me words of longing"
<p>In this case, (b) is the normal case in temporary Polish, while (a) is
archaic and today is used mostly only in poetry.
<p>The reason for the movability of these elements is that they originally were
enclitic forms of the verb "to be", which compbined with the perfect
participle in -l- to form the past tense and the conjunctive respectively.
<p>I don't know whether this really is on topic, but maybe some "Boardists"
will want to use something like this in a conlang?
<p>Best regards,
<br>Hans-Werner





<hr><i>Mark responds:
<p>Quechua has moveable elements too, such as the interrogative <b>-chu</b>,
the topic particle <b>-qa</b>, and the evidential particles.
</i>

<hr><center>
<i>To make a reply, or see replies, see <a href="../">the index page</a>.</i>
</center>

<hr>

<!-- For index page:
<li><a href="messages/467.html">Language evolution and the ic&euml;lani</a> - 
    <b>Hans-Werner Hatting</b>
 <i>15:38 7/16/02</i>
-->

</body></html>

Anon7 - 2021