KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/markrose/board/messages/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/markrose/board/messages/370.html
<html><head><title>Questions re: Historical Atlas and others</title></head>

<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">

<center><h1><!--title-->Questions re: Historical Atlas and others
</h1></center>

<hr size=7 width=75>
<p>Posted by <b><!--poster-->Joey</b>
on <!--date-->2:14 4/24/02
<p>In reply to: <a href="364.html">Questions re: Historical Atlas and others</a> posted by Joey</b>  on 3:29 4/22/02


<!-- PUT MESSAGE HERE -->
<p>

Mark wrote:

<blockquote>
I don't think I've given an exact figure for the Almean day; but it's
much less than the 26.7 hours that would be needed to make the year the
same length. I don't really worry about converting years, since Almean
time doesn't run in parallel with ours.
</blockquote>

<p>That was my point in bringing it up, since the original question was
about whether a length of time given in the Historical Atlas was
reasonable for people to make a certain technological leap.  I understand
what you mean about time not running parallel, I just wanted to point it
out as something to consider when people are reading the Atlas, and
thinking about how long things took.

<p>Joey



<hr><center>
<i>To make a reply, or see replies, see <a href="../">the index page</a>.</i>
</center>

<hr>

<!-- For index page:
<li><a href="messages/370.html">Questions re: Historical Atlas and others</a> - 
    <b>Joey</b>
 <i>2:14 4/24/02</i>
-->

</body></html>

Anon7 - 2021