KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/markrose/board/messages/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/markrose/board/messages/328.html
<html><head><title>Star light, star bright</title></head>

<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">

<center><h1><!--title-->Star light, star bright
</h1></center>

<hr size=7 width=75>
<p>Posted by <b><!--poster-->Philip Newton</b>
on <!--date-->13:18 2/26/02
<p>In reply to: <a href="324.html">Almean dragons?</a> posted by Joey</b>  on 00:28 2/25/02


<!-- PUT MESSAGE HERE -->
<p>
And what about stars? Verdurian (curul&euml;) and Cu&ecirc;zi (alaldas)
have a word for them, but none of Isma&icirc;n, Barakhinei, Cadhinor, or
proto-Eastern appear to have a word for it, as far as I could see. (Wede:i
has "ma:in", however.) Didn't those people ever look up at the night
sky?</p>

<p>While attempting to translate a little poem into several languages, I
made up what I though plausible versions: I posited a Cadhinor borrowing
*alaldos from the Cu&ecirc;zi (male) noun alaldas, which then became
Barakhinei *al&ocirc;d (&lt; *al&ocirc;ld &lt; al&ocirc;ldo &lt; alaldo &lt;
Cadh. alaldos) and Isma&icirc;n *alal,de (&lt; alal,do &lt; alaldo &lt;
Cadh. alaldos) through regular sound changes. This doesn't explain Verdurian
curul&euml;, but perhaps they just made up another word or borrowed a poetic
synonym which disappeared in the other languages. (What would have been the
reflex of *alaldos? &gt; alald&ocirc;s &gt; alald&ocirc; &gt; alald? But
compare "dunal&aacute;l" without the final -d, which is said to come from
Cadhinor DUNALALDOS, from Cu&ecirc;zi dunalaldos. So it seems Cadhinor had
"dunalaldos" but not *"alaldos"? And that Cu&ecirc;zi spelled the word
inconsistently -dos or -das?)</p>

<p>Cheers,<br>Philip.</p>



<hr><i>Mark responds:
<p>I think this dates back to when I was re-working Cadhinor.  I'd have to
check my list of difficult etymologies at home, but I'd guess that I didn't
like any of the possible etymons for <b>curul&euml;</b>.  The late Cadhinor
form would have to be CURULILE (or, given that there's a difficult-to-explain
o &gt; u change in many words, CUROLILE or CORULILE).  This would be a nominalization of
a yet-unknown root CURUL-.  It's tempting to interpret this as a past participle; it's too old a word however for the -ul- to be the Verdurian diminutive.  

<p>Hmm, with dissimilation, the root could also be CULUL- or COLUL-; or with metathesis, CULUR-, COLUR-.  Well, stay tuned for the exciting resolution; I offer
these meanderings as a glimpse into my thought processes while creating words.

<p>Cu&ecirc;zi borrowings are usually pretty safe, especially in poetry; but
I don't think the Cadhinorians would have had to borrow a word for 'star'.  ('Planet' is another matter; of course our word derives from Greek.)  And if Verdurian innovated one, Isma&icirc;n would probably share it.  I'll have to check your derivations at home. 

<p>The Cu&ecirc;zi for 'planet' should be <b>dunalaldas</b>.  (The alternation is my mistake, not the Cuzeians'.  This is one of the first Cu&ecirc;zi words I invented, and I hadn't settled on -as as the most common ending.)

<p>According to my sound change program, the Verdurian reflex of *ALALDOS should be <b>al&aacute;ld</b>.  My intuition says <b>al&aacute;l</b>, however, to match <b>dunal&aacute;l</b>.  An alternative would be <b>alaud</b>, with the change l &gt; u, but this change isn't supposed to occur before final D; compare ETALDOS &gt; etald.  But the rule isn't very firm, since there's only two words in -LDOS, and the D is retained in one Verdurian reflex and not the other.

<hr><center>
<i>To make a reply, or see replies, see <a href="../">the index page</a>.</i>
</center>

<hr>

<!-- For index page:
<li><a href="messages/328.html">Star light, star bright</a> - 
    <b>Philip Newton</b>
 <i>13:18 2/26/02</i>
-->

</body></html>

Anon7 - 2021