|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/markrose/board/messages/ |
Upload File : |
<html><head><title>Non-Proto-Western classical words</title></head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<center><h1><!--title-->Non-Proto-Western classical words
</h1></center>
<hr size=7 width=75>
<p>Posted by <b><!--poster-->Gustavo S. Pereira</b>
on <!--date-->20:10 9/18/01
<p>In reply to: (none)
<!-- PUT MESSAGE HERE -->
<p>
Hi everybody!
<p>A question: we know that not all Cu�zi and/or Cadhinor (and/or Axunashin, or etc) words can be traced back to Proto-Eastern. And the other words, where do they come from, or how did they appear on the languages? Are they borrowed or simple created? What would be the "explanation" for that happening?
<p>Cheers,
<br>Gustavo Pereira
<hr><i>Mark responds:
<p>I'll just note here that the same question applies to Indo-European linguistics... e.g. where did all the Germanic words that can't be traced back to IE come from?</i>
<hr><center>
<i>To make a reply, or see replies, see <a href="../">the index page</a>.</i>
</center>
<hr>
<!-- For index page:
<li><a href="messages/183.html">Non-Proto-Western classical words</a> -
<b>Gustavo S. Pereira</b>
<i>20:10 9/18/01</i>
-->
</body></html>