<!--#include virtual="/includes/archive.shtml"-->
 <div id="main"> <a name="#top"></a> <a name="#top"></a> 
    <h3 class="title">"Walking Worthy! Much of the shaping of our spiritual lives takes place in the struggle, not in the victory"</h3>
    <h4 class="titlesmall">UPDATE - October 12, 2011</h4>
    <div id="print" style="border: 1px dashed #BBBBBB; padding: 0 0 0 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em;"> 
      <p><a href="#" onclick="window.print();return false;"><img src="/images/print.gif" width="19" height="17" border="0" align="bottom"> 
        Print this page&#187;</a></p>
    </div>

<p>There is so much information and veritable facts to share with you - much you have yet to be exposed to. As such, I oftentimes do not know where to start. As mentioned in previous Updates; I have and continue to prepare and will share all documentation, all records, all correspondence, all veritable facts, and all decisions rendered - all considered Public Records; as I am the affected party and I will expose everyone involved in the conspiracy, corruption, and cover-up for their blatant lies, distortions, and flagrant violations of my "due process" rights under the Constitution of the United States.</p>

<p>Atty. Scott S. Sinrich, of the Law Firm - Phillips, Silver, Talman, Aframe and Sinrich in Worcester, legal counsel for Nordgren Memorial Chapel and Kurt and Katherine Mangsen, is scared to death that he will be held accountable for his actions, distorted statements, and yes, blatant lies made to the Massachusetts Funeral Board, Massachusetts Division of Professional Licensure, the Massachusetts Office of the District Attorney in Worcester, as well as Justices of the Worcester Courts. Atty. Sinrich even went so far, with the assistance of Nordgren Memorial Chapel�s Accountant, Johanna Higham, to intentionally and deliberately violate a direct Order of Justice Locke, Worcester Superior Court. I shall soon share with you the email (veritable evidence) from Mrs. Katherine Mangsen to Investigator Bresnahan, Division of Professional Licensure to this fact. Just maybe Justice Agnes, now a Justice of the Massachusetts Appellate Court, will realize an Emergency Motion exposing a violation of a Direct Order of the Worcester Superior Court of which He (Justice Agnes) was the presiding Justice (Order of Justice Locke), was not and is not "moot" based upon a wrongful decision he (Justice Agnes) made supported only by contrived, distorted, and non-veritable facts now clearly introduced into the Public Record.</p>

<p>I even went so far as to file a complaint against Attorney Sinrich with the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers (BBO). I will soon share all correspondence with you concerning this issue, but suffice it to say, the attorney representing the BBO could not endorse any of the accounts (actions of Atty. Sinrich) presented to the BBO. Yet the attorney representing the BBO refused to recommend any sort of disciplinary action for Atty. Sinrich with the explanation, "We are exercising our <strong><em>�prosecutorial discretion�</em></strong> and will not be seeking disciplinary action against Atty. Sinrich. When I indicated to the BBO attorney I was going to appeal his decision to "higher authorities" at the BBO, he told me not to waste my time as he had never had a recommendation he made overturned in an appeal and expected he never would. </p>

<p>Yet when I shared the complete package of information I provided to the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers (BBO) to legal scholars, they were shocked (but not surprised) at the Massachusetts BBO�s lack of disciplinary action for Atty. Sinrich�s actions, false statements, and blatant lies.</p>

<p>Almost 3 months have passed since the last Update. Why so long? Quite frankly, I was waiting for a decision from the Massachusetts Court of Appeals in Boston. It was in July 2010 (more than a year having past) since I submitted an in-depth Brief detailing the voluminous factual errors in Justice Agnes�s Worcester Superior Court Decision to support the fraudulent decision of the Massachusetts Funeral Board. Accompanying my 50 page Brief to the Massachusetts Court of Appeals was a two (2) volume Appendices totaling 537 pages of veritable evidence of the conspiracy, corruption, and cover-up laced with concealment, obfuscation, and deception. With oral arguments scheduled for February 9, 2011, the process called for both me as the "Pro Se" Appellant and the Massachusetts Assistant Attorney General (Reynolds-Martin) / Appellee to each have 15 minutes to present our positions to three (3) Judges of the Massachusetts Appellate Court. The Judges would ask questions and query each of us during this period of time.</p>

<p>As the Plaintiff / Appellant I was first to make my presentation or at least begin the process. After less than one (1) minute into my remarks, I was interrupted by the Justices and pummeled with very pointed and excellent questions. The Justices had obviously read the Brief, were familiar with the overall case, and were prepared with their questions and comments. I was delighted to answer each and every question and concern presented to me by the Justices. Barely 7 minutes into my time of 15 minutes, the Justices stated they had heard enough, asked me to be seated, and commenced to<strong><em> drill</em></strong> (there is no other word to describe what was to occur) the Assistant Attorney General Reynolds-Martin. For a solid 15 minutes, the three (3) Justices relentlessly queried the Assistant Attorney General.</p>

<p>At the conclusion of the oral arguments and as I left the Courtroom, no less than 3 attorneys followed me out of the Chambers - each stating "You won that one!" "Great Job!" One attorney even asked if I was considering further legal action against the Commonwealth, to which I responded, "At this point, I only await a decision from this Court!" </p>

<p>I was informed by staff in the Appeals Court Clerk�s Office that I could expect a decision in 130 days (more or less), and that I should register to receive the Decision electronically - which I did. One hundred and thirty (130) days passed. One hundred and forty (140) days passed. Suddenly, an announcement (press release) was made indicating Justice Peter W. Agnes, Jr. was nominated to become a Justice of the Massachusetts Court of Appeals - the same Justice Peter W. Agnes, Jr. who rendered the Worcester Superior Court Decision affirming the fraudulent Massachusetts Funeral Board Decision; after which he (Justice Agnes) rendered a decision denying me a jury trial in a wrongful termination civil suit I filed 4+ years earlier in the Worcester Superior Court.</p>

<p>It was reported in the Worcester Telegram that Justice Agnes contacted Michael Angelini, Esq., Bowditch & Dewey Law Firm seeking his support, endorsement, and recommendation to Governor Patrick to nominated Justice Agnes for consideration to become a Justice of the Massachusetts Court of Appeals. What makes this so ironic is that originally I was represented by Atty. Angelini in both the case before the Massachusetts Funeral Board as well as the �Wrongful Termination" civil suit filed on my behalf in the Worcester Superior Court by Atty. Angelini in March 2004.Twenty-two (22) months later (January 2006) in the middle of the prosecution�s presentations during the Administrative Hearings Proceedings before the Massachusetts Division of Professional Licensure and before my defense could be presented after months of depositions and legal proceedings at great expense to me up to this point, Atty. Angelini withdrew from the proceedings in both the Massachusetts Funeral Board case as well as the Wrongful Termination Civil Case in the Worcester Superior Court.And now (assuming the record is accurate in the Worcester Telegram), Atty. Angelini intercedes on behalf of Justice Agnes for the Appellate Court vacancy.</p>

<p>Several of you (regular followers of this web site), encouraged me to attend the Governor�s Council Meeting wherein Justice Agnes�s qualifications to become a Justice of the Massachusetts Court of Appeals were to be reviewed and discussed in detail. Comments and statements of fact were to be solicited from the public at that time. I did give this suggestion some serious thought; especially since I knew the Massachusetts Court of Appeals would now seek any and all means to affirm Justice Agnes�s Decision(s) against me; for it would truly be embarrassing for Justice Agnes and the Massachusetts Court of Appeals to over-turn a Decision of Justice Agnes, while at the same time he was being endorsed for a Judgeship in their Chambers.</p>

<p>It has always been my position to stand on the truth before God, and that to walk worthy with God at all times - for He knows my heart now and always. With that said, I chose not to interfere with the process of Justice Agnes�s ascent to the Massachusetts Appellate Court.</p>

<p>At the same time, I realized there was No way the Massachusetts Court of Appeals was now going to reverse Justice Agnes�s Superior Court Decision(s). I, therefore, contacted the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) for procedural direction; as it was obvious to me that I would be making Application for Further Judicial Review of what would ultimately be a vote of confidence for Justice Agnes and an affirmation of his Superior Court Decision against me now by the Massachusetts Court of Appeals.</p>

<p>Well, I didn�t have to wait long. On August 17, 2011 the Massachusetts Court of Appeals affirmed the decision(s) of Justice Agnes following the same path as the Worcester Superior Court - that being stating as factual "false and fabricated facts" contrary to that which was presented throughout the Administrative Proceedings Process. One need only review my filing with the Worcester Superior Court of the Massachusetts Funeral Board Decision to see that the Massachusetts Funeral Board and the Division of Professional Licensure�s Administrative Hearings Counsel (Anne Colleton) could care less about the veritable facts and relied solely on false facts, false assertions and allegations, and did everything in their powers to prevent the veritable facts from entering the Administrative Proceedings from the outset.</p>

<p>Realizing the conspiracy and subsequent cover-up at the Worcester Superior Court </p>
<p>(Justice Agnes) and now the Massachusetts Appellate Court was "The Commonwealth must be protected by all means", I immediately Motioned the Massachusetts Appellate Court for a "Stay of the Rescript" to September 29, 2011. What this means, if my understanding is correct, is that - The Decision of the Massachusetts Court of Appeals would not be issued to the lower court (Worcester Superior Court) pending an Application for Further Appellate Review being submitted by me to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on or before September 29, 2011. With the Labor Day holiday and recovery from a minor medical procedure having past, I focused my attention (which was easy to do) to demonstrate to the Supreme Judicial Court the folly of the decisions of the aforementioned entities in this matter along with the complete and total breakdown of the "supposed checks and balances" are system of government purports to have in place.</p>

<p>Initially limited to 10 pages of text by Commonwealth of Massachusetts published guidelines, my initial attempt to address the many inaccurate statements of fact and law in the Court of Appeals decision resulted in 19+ pages of text. The second (2<sup>nd</sup>) re-write was just under 17 pages, and the final re-write was a full 14 pages of text. I could not consolidate my submission any further without compromising the integrity of my submission to the Supreme Judicial Court. I, therefore, contacted the Supreme Judicial Court and asked if I could Motion the SJC for an enlargement of the text for my submission. Advised as to the process, I Motioned the Supreme Judicial Court for an enlargement of the text portion of the Application - said Motion accompanied my Application for Further Judicial Review.</p>

<p>Impoverished by this entire process (soon to be 8 years as of November 19, 2011), I had to borrow the $270.00 to file the Application for Further Judicial Review with the SJC as well as the funds to reproduce the 70 page Application (70 pages included the Worcester Superior Court Decision, the Massachusetts Court of Appeals Decision, and numerous Appended Documents) that more fully exposed the conspiracy and corruption at the Massachusetts Funeral Board and Division of Professional Licensure and that was <strong><em>deliberately</em></strong> overlooked by all parties to the Process including the Courts up to this point.</p>

<p>On September 29, 2011 I traveled by train at a reduced fare (afforded seniors) to Boston to hand deliver 18 original signed copies of the Application for Further Appellate Review with the Clerk�s Office of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, along with a single copy hand delivered to the Massachusetts Court of Appeals. At that point I was notified I also needed to file an electronic copy with the Massachusetts Court of Appeals, which I did upon my return to my residence later in the day.</p>

<p>As I await notification from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court as to their action in this matter, I am hopeful the SJC will see through the charade and the dark veil of concealment, obfuscation, and deception (I refer to as C.O.D.) that has permeated a conspiracy that is clearly stated in the words of the perpetrators on an Audio Tape of the Massachusetts Funeral Board Meeting of December 9, 2003 - yet to be heard publicly by anyone in the process - all fearful their deliberate (and yes, <strong><em>criminal</em></strong>) activity and participation in the conspiracy, corruption, and cover-up will be career ending for all.</p>

<p>I have been asked by many of you for parts if not all of the approximately 7,000 pages of documents that have been generated in this case over the past almost 8 years - the most recent request for the court reporters transcripts of the testimony of Kurt Mangsen (President of Nordgren Memorial Chapel) and that of John Bresnahan (Division of Professional Licensure investigator).Both Mr. Mangsen and Mr. Bresnahan made some very poignant statements of false and fraudulent facts that were deliberately generated only to support their pre-conceived positions and were contrary to the veritable facts in the matter. Add to this lewd unsupported statements made by Mr. Mangsen referencing 3<sup>rd</sup> parties to which Mr. Mangsen could not remember where and when they were made and you have a shamful (and shameful) process of lies, fabrications, and distortions of a magnitude yet to be exposed - but a process soon to see the "light of day." Both Mr. Mangsen and Mr. Bresnahan referenced conversations and statements made by other funeral directors; yet when I called these witnesses they not only contradicted the statements of Mangsen and Bresnahan, but made it perfectly clear that the statements made were "outright lies!"</p>

<p>As noted previously, I am processing all the documents (Public Records) so that I may release any and all at my discretion electronically to whomever I so choose. At some point, I shall release them to everyone interested; but not until I have exhausted all remedies and appeals available to me as a citizen of the United States.</p>

<p>Allow me to conclude this Update, with a personal thanks for your interest and support. It is my fervent belief that "No one should unjustly be denied their <strong><em>Life, Liberty, and Opportunity to Economically Prosper" </em></strong>based upon bias, prejudice, and most importantly Pre-Judgment by individuals in a position to corrupt a process in our government. We, (you, me, the Administrative Process, the Courts of this land) - No One can stand by and allow this to occur in this day of full transparency. Most of the perpetrators have retreated to the darkness of their fox-holes, hoping and praying not to be exposed for their unjust and criminal actions. Others have sought comfort in other (new) positions both within and outside the governmental process. Others have past on; only to be judged by the Good Lord - a Day of Judgment that I suspect ended in a very warm and unpleasant place. Whatever their motives, remember - "God Does Not Bless a Dishonest Heart!"</p>

<p>I promise to present Updates more frequently and to reveal the veritable facts I have withheld from publishing up to now as I have navigated this very challenging process.</p>

<p>I leave you with this - <strong>"Unrighteousness is tolerated in this country, but true justice can and must be asserted by the courts before "Real" justice is eventually asserted by GOD!"</strong></p>

<p>Where do you stand? Till next time - PEACE To All!</p>

</div>
<!--#include virtual="/includes/footr.shtml"-->