KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/justiceatwhatprice.c/archives/2007/07/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/justiceatwhatprice.c/archives/2007/07/20070707.shtml
<!--#include virtual="/includes/archive.shtml"-->
  <div id="main"> <a name="#top"></a> 
    <h3 class="title">Conspiracy &amp; Corruption Infectious Within Division of 
      Professional Licensure</h3>
    <h3 class="title">&#8220;It&#8217;s Time to Investigate&#8221; &#8211; Governor 
      Patrick</h3>
    <h4 class="titlesmall">UPDATE: July 7, 2007</h4>
    <div id="print" style="border: 1px dashed #BBBBBB; padding: 0 0 0 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em;"> 
      <p><a href="#" onclick="window.print();return false;"><img src="/images/print.gif" width="19" height="17" border="0" align="bottom"> 
        Print this page&#187;</a></p>
    </div>
    <p><strong>Part 2</strong></p>
    <p><em>&#8220;Is it at the direction of George K. Weber, Director of the Division 
      of Professional Licensure or is it the personal action of D.P.L.&#8217;s 
      Chief Counsel, Kathe F. Mullally, to withhold Public Records visually inspected 
      and requested by me during an &#8220;in situ&#8221; inspection on April 
      24, 2007 &#8211; more than 8 weeks ago?&#8221;</em></p>
    <p>As one of the prominent players assigned to the Board of Registration of 
      Funeral Directors and Embalmers has so eloquently stated in correspondence 
      &#8211; &#8220;and the Saga continues&#8230;&#8221;</p>
    <p><u>Unfortunately, &#8220;Yes, it does!&#8221;</u> Let&#8217;s continue. 
      In an effort to deny me access to copies of public records, which I inspected, 
      listed, notated, and personally handed to Chief Counsel for the Division 
      of Professional Licensure, Kathe F. Mullally, on April 24, 2007, the following 
      letter was received from Ms. Cheryl Yebba, Public Records Administrator 
      for the entire Division of Professional Licensure dated May 21, 2007.</p>
    <div class="insert">
	  <p>It is required that you have the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html" target="_blank">Adobe 
        Reader</a> installed on your computer to view the following attached document.</p>
      <p> <strong> </strong><strong>- </strong>May 21, 2007 Letter from Cheryl 
        Yebba, Administrator of Public Records, MA Division of Professional Licensure<strong> 
        </strong><a href="/documents/MAR262007.pdf">[Download]</a></p>
	</div>
    <p>Clearly an attempt to thwart my efforts to obtain the requested public 
      records by fabricating cost beyond ones authority, Ms. Yebba (I do not believe 
      for a moment Ms. Yebba drafted the correspondence) signed the aforementioned 
      correspondence as the Division&#8217;s Public Records Administrator.</p>
    <p>On June 5, 2007 I forwarded the following correspondence directly to George 
      K. Weber, Director, Division of Professional Licensure &#8211; for as the 
      Director ultimately responsible for the actions and statements of his employees 
      and staff; it was time for him to stand up and be counted (I meant to say 
      &#8211; &#8220;accountable&#8221;) for the cancer that had permeated the 
      Division for which he was/is the responsible official. </p>
    <div class="insert">
	  <p>It is required that you have the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html" target="_blank">Adobe 
        Reader</a> installed on your computer to view the following attached document.</p>
      <p> <strong> - </strong>June 5, 2007 Correspondence to Mr. George K. Weber, 
        Esq. <a href="/documents/JUN52007.pdf">[Download]</a></p>
	</div>
    <p>Not surprised for a moment that Mr. Weber (Director, DPL) chose not to 
      respond to my correspondence dated June 5, 2007 in a timely manner, I forwarded 
      another correspondence to Mr. Weber on June 18, 2007.</p>
    <div class="insert">
	  <p>It is required that you have the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html" target="_blank">Adobe 
        Reader</a> installed on your computer to view the following attached document.</p>
      <p> <strong> </strong><strong>- </strong>June 18, 2007 Correspondence to 
        Mr. George K. Weber, Esq.<strong> </strong><a href="/documents/JUN182007.pdf">[Download]</a></p>
	</div>
    <p>I have come to realize that either &#8220;email and 1st Class Mail&#8221; 
      get the attention of the government functionaries in the Division of Professional 
      Licensure or &#8220;certified mail&#8221; are the only means of assuring 
      that correspondence does not go astray. As you will see, my correspondence 
      dated June 18, 2007 and forwarded to Mr. Weber got an immediate response, 
      not from Mr. Weber as you will note, but from Ms. Yebba. In her letter to 
      me dated June 20, 2007 (please note the date &#8211; June 20, 2007), in 
      the opening paragraph Ms. Yebba references incorrectly a correspondence 
      I supposedly sent to Mr. Weber dated June 21, 2007 &#8211; the day after 
      she supposedly signed the letter to follow. I suspect like just about every 
      piece of correspondence from the Division of Professional Licensure, the 
      correspondence was back-dated in order to meet definitive timeframes that 
      were missed &#8211; and in this case, the &#8220;faus-pax&#8221; was not 
      caught in time. Therefore, Ms. Yebba in her infinite wisdom was able to 
      project the future in her correspondence to me dated June 20, 2007, herewith 
      presented.</p>
    <div class="insert">
	  <p>It is required that you have the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html" target="_blank">Adobe 
        Reader</a> installed on your computer to view the following attached document.</p>
      <p> <strong> - </strong>June 20, 2007 Letter from Cheryl Yebba, Administrator 
        of Public Records, MA Division of Professional Licensure <a href="/documents/JUN202007.pdf">[Download]</a></p>
	</div>
    <p>As you can see, Ms. Yebba&#8217;s response on June 20, 2007 is a repeat 
      of the content of the correspondence she signed on May 21, 2007. <u><strong>Please 
      note: </strong></u>Nothing in the way of a response from George K. Weber, 
      Director, DPL.</p>
    <p>It became apparent to me that I needed to become educated on the Public 
      Records Law for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. I blocked out the day, 
      Monday, July 2, 2007 and went to the Law Library at the Worcester County 
      Courthouse. Not trained in any aspect of the legal profession (having lived 
      my 62 years relying on exercising good judgment &#8211; and seeking justice 
      by knowing the facts before making any decisions), I was at the mercy of 
      law librarians to point me in the right direction. This they did and I spent 
      7+ hours reading and reading more. I was overwhelmed, to say the least. 
      I left the law library with 8 pages of notes and information on the Public 
      Records Law for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which assisted me in 
      a letter I forwarded to Chief Counsel, Mullally on Wednesday, July 4, 2007.</p>
    <p>At this time I shall reframe from publishing my correspondence to Ms. Mullally, 
      pending a response from Ms. Mullally and receipt of the public records I 
      requested on April 24, 2007.</p>
    <p>Yes, the Saga continues as does the flow of an estimated $2.6+M of taxpayer 
      dollars wasted by the State Board and Division of Professional Licensure 
      in a <em>&#8220;witch hunt&#8221;</em> - those following the proceedings 
      cannot believe is happening in the year 2007. </p>
    <p>In the last update, I referenced correspondence I forwarded to Ms. Anne 
      Roan, president, Massachusetts Funeral Director&#8217;s Association (M.F.D.A.), 
      indicating before I presented any information I was awaiting a response 
      from Ms. Roan and the MFDA. Well, it took a couple of weeks, but the response 
      is now in hand. Along with an update of my attempts to obtain public records 
      dating back several months now, the next update will provide you, the reader; 
      you the funeral director; and you the consumer an awareness that may (or 
      may not) surprise you &#8211; but at a minimum, you will see for yourself 
      the direction and path the funeral business (at least in Massachusetts) 
      has chosen.</p>
    <p><strong>Next Update &#8211; July 17, 2007<br>
      </strong><em><strong>Subject - 
      </strong></em></p>
    <p align="center"><em>&#8220;Membership in M.F.D.A. has NO Value!&#8221;<br>
      &#8220;Fearful Truth Be Known&#8221; - Massachusetts Funeral Director&#8217;s 
      Association declines invitation to participate in independent review of 
      State Board Decision</em></p>
    <p align="left"><em><strong>Stay Tuned.</strong></em></p>
    <p><em><a href="#top"></a></em><a href="#top">Return To The Top of The Page 
      &#187;</a></p>
  </div>
<!--#include virtual="/includes/footr.shtml"-->



Anon7 - 2021