|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/justiceatwhatprice.c/archives/2007/04/ |
Upload File : |
<!--#include virtual="/includes/archive.shtml"-->
<div id="main">
<h3 class="title"><a name="#top"></a>All the Clear & Missing Proof<br>
behind All the Complaints & Allegations made to the<br>
State License Board by Katherine Mangsen are<br>
Now…Visible & Documented for All to See</h3>
<h3 align="center" class="title"><img src="/images/page_turn.gif" width="164" height="134">
</h3>
<h3 class="title">All the Many Legal Pages of …Massive Missing Proof<br>
<br>
<u>Allegations made! Allegations disproved! What now?</u><br>
</h3>
<h4 class="titlesmall">UPDATE: April 10, 2007</h4>
<div id="print" style="border: 1px dashed #BBBBBB; padding: 0 0 0 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em;">
<p><a href="#" onclick="window.print();return false;"><img src="/images/print.gif" width="19" height="17" border="0" align="bottom">
Print this page»</a></p>
</div>
<p>Before I share with you the preposterous allegations and accusations made
by Katherine Mangsen, treasurer, Nordgren Memorial Chapel to the State Board
in complaint <em><strong>EM-04-184 (the 3rd in the series)</strong></em>
– a complaint the content of which serves as a “prime”
example of the far reaching conspiracy, corruption, and cover-up by the
State Board, its investigator, and those who now are clearly implicated
as co-conspirators in the process – corrupted because they (the Board,
the investigator, and government functionaries) were taken in and believed
a woman whose allegations and accusations were self-serving, baseless in
fact, and without merit, I wish to alert you to the fact that “a Special
Update” will be presented on April 19th, the subject: “Emails
from readers of <u><em><strong>The Funeral Monitor</strong></em></u> as
they relate to attack articles in its publication”.</p>
<p>As you know by now, as does the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers
and the Division of Professional Licensure (although don’t hold your
breath waiting for anyone of them to admit it), Katherine Mangsen filed
three (3) complaints with the Board – all of which have been proven
to be nothing short of a vicious attack on my character and integrity to
somehow justify terminating me on November 19, 2003; since I was “supposedly”
no longer of value to her and her, husband, Kurt.</p>
<p>According to John Bresnahan on December 9, 2003 and again under oath on
May 2, 2006, Nordgren’s was initiating a job action against Haddad
prior to Bresnahan’s inspection on November 19, 2003.</p>
<p>Katherine Mangsen, (with the assistance of Ronald Johnson – a director
of the corporation, a funeral director at Nordgren’s and a personal
friend of John Kazlauskas, Chairman of the Board) conspired to terminate
me as a result of Bresnahan’s inspection, using this as the opportunity
needed to terminate me for “supposed” justifiable reason. Scott
S. Sinrich, corporate counsel for Nordgren’s and clerk of the corporation
at that time, saw enough merit in this action to immediately prepare a letter
of termination, bring it to Kurt Mangsen for signature, and have it delivered
to me by a constable – all within 5 hours. Have you ever seen an attorney
work so fast? Or do you think it was pre-planned and already scripted before
Bresnahan’s supposed unannounced inspection on November 19, 2003?</p>
<p>Mrs. Mangsen’s 3rd complaint in the series submitted to the Board
stated that I “revoked” an irrevocable pre-need funeral arrangement
for Victoria Adams, who decided to pre-plan and pre-pay for her own funeral
arrangements after the sudden passing of her husband, James (a funeral I
conducted in the normal course of business at Nordgren Memorial Chapel).
</p>
<p>Just prior to this transaction, Nordgren Memorial Chapel had secured funding
for the buy-out of the Carrigan’s interest in the business through
a loan with BankNorth and with Robert Paulsen, as the Vice President and
representative for the process. I was not involved in any of the funding
negotiations other than being asked by Kurt if I would help them with a
$50,000 down payment on the loan. (I refinanced my personal residence in
order to raise the $50,000). As part of the agreement with BankNorth, when
possible, all pre-need and pre-funded funeral arrangements were to be funded
through BankNorth. (I had no problem with this requirement). Victoria Adam’s
pre-need and pre-funded funeral arrangements were thus deposited with BankNorth.</p>
<p>Several months later when Mrs. Adams received the 1099 tax form for the
interest earned on the account, she contacted her dear friends, Norman and
Gloria Simo, and asked if they too had received 1099 tax forms. Their response
was “No, our pre-planned funeral arrangements are funded through Columbian
Life Insurance Company. We don’t receive 1099 tax forms.”</p>
<p>I immediately received a phone call from Mrs. Adams in Florida indicating
she wished to have her pre-need funding transferred to Columbian Life Insurance
Company. I indicated to Mrs. Adams, I would contact BankNorth and work out
the details. I called Robert Paulsen at BankNorth and left a message on
his voice mail to contact me. Low and behold that very same evening, I ran
into Robert Paulsen on the second floor (men’s department) at Sear’s
in Auburn, Massachusetts. I didn’t immediately recognize him, but
he recognized me right away and said – “hello”. At that
point he was unaware I had called him. </p>
<p>I explained the situation to Mr. Paulsen and asked if BankNorth had a program
to manage the funds without the need for a 1099 tax form to be issued for
the interest earned at years end to the family? His response, “I don’t
think so, but let me check.” The very next day, Mr. Paulsen called
me at Nordgren’s, the message was relayed to me, and I contacted Mr.
Paulsen at which time he told me BankNorth was required to forward 1099
tax forms and there was no way around it.</p>
<p>I asked Mr. Paulsen how would I complete the BankNorth surrender form,
because it said “Irrevocable” on it! He responded, “Check
the box that says <em><strong>Irrevocable</strong></em>, because you are
NOT revoking the pre-need funeral arrangements with Nordgren’s in
any way. You are only changing the funding arrangements on a BankNorth form,
which has NO impact on Nordgren’s, No impact on the arrangements made
with the family, and it is being generated at the direction of the family.
I completed the documents, forwarded them to Mrs. Adams, they were signed,
forwarded to BankNorth, and the funds were directed to Columbian Life Insurance
Company and the policy was issued.</p>
<p>Now wouldn’t you think Bresnahan, a former funeral director and owner
of a funeral home in Pittsfield, would know this procedure; as he stated
under oath on May 2, 2006 that when he owned and managed the aforementioned
funeral home, he converted numerous pre-need funeral accounts from trust
to insurance with Peter Klamkin (when Klamkin was with Forethought Life
Insurance Company) and again with Peter Klamkin (when he joined Columbian
Life Insurance Company)? Bresnahan’s supervisor’s apparently
knew little (or could care less). The Prosecution Attorney’s during
the Administrative process obviously were not familiar with this process.
And certainly, the Administrative Hearing Counsel had NO familiarity or
understanding of this process.</p>
<p>So Bresnahan, with the overt support of Kazlauskas (biased and prejudiced
as he was), turned a “blind eye” (actually both of them) to
the truth and bought into Mrs. Mangsen’s baseless complaint attempting
to “force fit” wrongful facts, distorted facts, and false facts
into current regulations. <u>How Truly Sad!</u> </p>
<p>What you have now read is but ONLY _ of the equation and the essence of
complaint EM-04-184. Is it possible the 2nd half is even more intriguing?
<u>I think so, but you be the judge!</u></p>
<p>Mrs. Mangsen continues in her 3rd complaint to state that in her research
of the rules and regulations for funeral service, it is her belief that
the services provided by Westland Services Corporation (landscaping services
to include gravesites) are in direct violation of the rules and regulations
that state and I quote, </p>
<p><strong><em>“No person engaged in embalming and funeral directing
or serving as an apprentice shall act or be employed as a caretaker or supervisor
in any cemetery”</em></strong></p>
<p>Any objective person, and especially an educated attorney, would soon realize
in 10 minutes or less that the services provided by Westland Services are
in NO WAY in conflict with or in violation of the rules and regulation of
funeral service. To determine otherwise would be to reach far beyond reason
and rationality.</p>
<p>Now from the <strong>“Sublime”</strong> to the <strong>“Ridiculous”!</strong></p>
<p>Mrs. Mangsen and her husband, Kurt, have referred several families to Westland
over the years prior to Mrs. Mangsen filing this complaint with the State
Board. Two (2) of these families decided beautification of the gravesite
with flowers etc. would be great, and they subscribed to a Westland contract.
Westland provides, as part of its marketing program (we do virtually no
paid advertising), an incentive (donation) for any referral from any source
that results in a Westland contract. In the event the donation is not accepted,
it is donated to the charity of choice of the referrer.</p>
<p>As I stated, the Mangsen’s referred two families to Westland that
resulted in contracts. Mrs. Mangsen was personally paid two (2) Five Hundred
Dollar ($500.00) checks for the referrals that resulted in Westland contracts.
Katherine Mangsen’s mother receives color photographs twice annually
of the work performed at her mother’s dear friend’s gravesite.
<strong>And yet, Katherine Mangsen filed a complaint with the Board against
me for supposedly owning a company that she has personally benefited from
($1,000 that she personally deposited into her personal account), and now
asserts Westland is in conflict with the rules and regulations of Funeral
Service.</strong></p>
<p>What’s equally tragic, Bresnahan and the Board hopped on both aspects
of this complaint (EM-04-184) like hungry children feasting on a birthday
cake – once again blinded by the real facts, blinded by the real truth,
and blinded by the prejudice and bias so firmly entrenched in their beings
by the statements and actions of the Board’s former chairman –
whom I suspect now resides in a place where none of us want to end up; and
yet a place, I suspect, Mr. Kazlauskas is reserving for many involved in
this process.</p>
<p>I suggest to all concerned and to each of you taking the time to read these
updates, that <strong>“you can live a lie for just so long”</strong>
– and then you are exposed by the truth! It may not be in this life
time (although I wouldn’t bet against it), but you WILL be judged
for your statements and actions. And if you leave this web site and update
with nothing else, DO KNOW that there are always <strong><em>“consequences”</em></strong>
for any action taken, and I encourage you to always weigh all the potential
consequences – <u>“good or bad”</u> / <u>“positive
or negative”</u>- of your statements and actions before making any
statements or taking any action.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Good Lord sees all!!! Don’t be foolish to believe
to the contrary!!</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Next Update – <u><em>Special Report</em></u> - April 19,
2007</strong></p>
<p><strong>Reader’s Unsolicited Comments concerning<br>
<u>“The Funeral Monitor”</u></strong></p>
<p><a href="#top">Return To The Top of The Page »</a></p></div>
<!--#include virtual="/includes/footr.shtml"-->