KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/justiceatwhatprice.c/archives/2007/03/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/justiceatwhatprice.c/archives/2007/03/20070331.shtml
<!--#include virtual="/includes/archive.shtml"-->
  <div id="main"> 
    <h3 class="title"><a name="#top"></a>All the Clear &amp; Missing Proof<br>
      behind All the Complaints &amp; Allegations made to the<br>
      State License Board by Katherine Mangsen are<br>
      Now&#8230;Visible &amp; Documented for All to See</h3>
    <h3 align="center" class="title"><img src="/images/page_turn.gif" width="164" height="134"> 
    </h3>
    <h3 class="title">All the Many Legal Pages of &#8230;Massive Missing Proof<br>
      <br>
      Allegations made! Allegations disproved! What now?<br>
    </h3>
    <h4 class="titlesmall">UPDATE: March 31, 2007</h4>
    <div id="print" style="border: 1px dashed #BBBBBB; padding: 0 0 0 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em;"> 
      <p><a href="#" onclick="window.print();return false;"><img src="/images/print.gif" width="19" height="17" border="0" align="bottom"> 
        Print this page&#187;</a></p>
    </div>
    <div id="special">
      <p><em>As a professional courtesy to Katherine and Kurt Mangsen, I have 
        decided to delete a statement made by a third party and referenced in 
        this (March 31, 2007) Update. </em></p>
      <p><em>Additional information may be found in the August 20, 2007 Update.</em></p>
      <p><em>- Philip G. Haddad, Jr.</em></p>
    </div>
    <p>Before I share with you the preposterous allegations and accusations made 
      by Katherine Mangsen, treasurer, Nordgren Memorial Chapel to the State Board 
      in complaint EM-04-126 &#8211; a complaint the content of which serves as 
      a &#8220;prime&#8221; example of the far reaching conspiracy, corruption, 
      and cover-up by the State Board, its investigator, and those who now are 
      clearly implicated as co-conspirators in the process &#8211; corrupted because 
      they (the Board, the investigator, and government functionaries) were taken 
      in and believed a woman whose allegations and accusations were self-serving, 
      baseless in fact, and without merit.</p>
    <p>On Friday, March 23, 2007 (after having returned from the International 
      Cemetery, Cremation, &amp; Funeral Association EXPO on the red eye just 
      hours before), I stopped at the West Side Grill in Northborough for two 
      orders of the best fish &amp; chips in New England. While waiting for my 
      order, a woman returning to the table where 3 of her friends were already 
      seated, said, &#8220;Phil, where&#8217;s Carolyn?&#8221; (in reference to 
      my wife). Explaining I was waiting for an order-to-go, she insisted I come 
      to her table and meet the others in her party. I agreed and was introduced 
      to 2 women I had not met before and one woman whom I had met, but knew little 
      about.</p>
    <p>One of the women I had not met prior to that very moment stated, &#8220;Are 
      you the Phil Haddad from the web site &#8211; Justice at What Price?&#8221; 
      Before I could answer, the woman who invited me to the table declared, &#8220;Yes, 
      he is!&#8221; She then stated, &#8220;I have kept each of my friends up 
      to date on the happenings with Nordgren&#8217;s and the State &#8211; now 
      each of us read the updates regularly&#8221;. The other woman whom I had 
      not met previously stated, &#8220;that Nordgren Lady, the treasurer, (referencing 
      Katherine Mangsen) must be the devil in disguise&#8221;. &#8220;You know 
      the devil takes on whatever appearance that suits his purpose, and I&#8217;m 
      not kidding, she could be the devil&#8221;. My response, &#8220;Now, now 
      &#8211; go easy!&#8221;</p>
    <p>Continuing on the woman said, &#8220;No I mean it! When the devil puts 
      his arms around you and you in turn do the same to others as that Nordgren 
      woman has done with the State Board and those people; they too become the 
      devil&#8217;s servants&#8221;. (All of a sudden my stomach got a bit queasy, 
      as the woman&#8217;s assessment did make sense).</p>
    <p>Unfortunately, I couldn&#8217;t get the words spoken by these ladies out 
      of my mind. My appetite was gone. Was it possible Mrs. Mangsen was consumed 
      by the devil? Was it possible that those who were taken up with her mistruths 
      were now also consumed by and became co-conspirators with and for the devil? 
      My thoughts immediately turned to Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s vicious and unjust 
      attack on Jack Carrigan, an owner and treasurer of Nordgren Memorial Chapel. 
      She initiated a complaint against Mr. Carrigan with the International Order 
      of the Golden Rule (Mr. Carrigan being a long-time member of OGR&#8217;s 
      Board of Directors) for supposedly stealing monies from the funeral home 
      &#8211; allegations that were never proven.<strong> <em>Does this scenario 
      sound strikingly familiar?</em></strong></p>
    <p>To this day, I have the greatest respect for the International Order of 
      the Golden Rule (OGR), for <em><strong>unlike</strong></em> the State Board 
      and Division of Professional Licensure, OGR refused to get caught up in 
      a business dispute and discounted Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s actions as irresponsible, 
      baseless, and without merit.</p>
    <p>Let us now turn to complaint EM-04-126 filed by Mrs. Mangsen on December 
      24, 2003 (Christmas Eve) &#8211; the day before we celebrate the birth of 
      Jesus Christ. (Is there relevance to this date and the remarks by the woman 
      at the restaurant concerning the &#8220;devil-in-disguise&#8221;? It&#8217;s 
      an eerie thought, isn&#8217;t it?).</p>
    <p>In complaint EM-04-126, reviewed by someone at the Division of Professional 
      Licensure, he/she/or they judged there was merit to the complaint and assigned 
      it a number (EM-04-126) and forwarded it to me for a response. Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s 
      complaint read as follows:</p>
    <ul>
      <li> &#8220;I am filing this complaint against Philip G. Haddad, Jr. for 
        enticing people to move their pre-paid funerals to another funeral home. 
        Attached please see 2 examples of him contacting these people (his signature 
        as notary public proves this). Mr. Haddad was terminated on November 19, 
        2003. He had worked here since 1994. He is attempting to take what he 
        perceives as &#8216;his business&#8217; with him. He is contacting the 
        people with whom he met while employed here at Nordgren and convincing 
        them to leave. I believe this to be unprofessional, unethical and illegal. 
        Please respond. Thank you.&#8221;</li>
    </ul>
    <p>The 2 examples to so-call &#8220;prove this&#8221; as Mrs. Mangsen so emphatically 
      stated were regarding the pre-arrangements for Freda Haddad (arranged by 
      her son, Edward) and T. Catherine Rizkalla (arranged by her daughter, Janet). 
    </p>
    <p>I provided a detailed response to Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s Christmas Eve complaint 
      to the State Board within the 10 days allotted to me to respond. Not ONLY 
      did the State Board and the investigator for the Division of Professional 
      Licensure totally disregard my &#8220;official&#8221; response to the complaint, 
      NO effort was made in Bresnahan&#8217;s so-called investigation to contact 
      either family to verify the veracity of Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s allegations 
      and accusation made in the complaint now officially tagged EM-04-126. The 
      allegations made by Mrs. Mangsen, supposedly investigated by Bresnahan, 
      incorporated into an Order to Show Cause issued to me 6 months later, and 
      during the Administrative Hearing Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s allegations, accusations, 
      and complaint in its entirety were proved to be false, baseless, without 
      merit, and totally a figment of Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s uncontrolled imagination.</p>
    <p><strong>How could this happen, you ask?</strong></p>
    <p>Because Bresnahan, up till now, relied on support he had received from 
      the then Chairperson, Kazlauskas, Bresnahan did not see the need to contact 
      the families to determine if the content in Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s complaint 
      had merit. Due to his extensive investigative training and experience, apparently 
      Bresnahan felt he needed ONLY to contact his friend, Kevin Mercadante (the 
      successor funeral director for the arrangements of the Haddad and Rizkalla 
      families) and NOT the families referenced in Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s complaint.</p>
    <p>Mr. Mercadante saw this as a wonderful opportunity to re-capture the Syrian/Antiochian 
      as well as other Orthodox funeral business, (some of which his funeral home 
      had served prior to my becoming a funeral director in Worcester) by stating 
      to Bresnahan that<em> &#8220;yes, it appeared to him that I influenced and 
      induced the Haddad and Rizkalla families to move their funeral arrangements 
      from Nordgren&#8217;s to his funeral home (Mercadante Funeral Home &amp; 
      Chapel)&#8221;.</em></p>
    <p>To further put the so-called &#8220;nail in my coffin&#8221; with the State 
      Board, Mr. Mercadante further stated to Bresnahan (according to Bresnahan), 
      that I attempted to enter into a financial arrangement with his funeral 
      home for the purpose of bringing pre-need funeral arrangements I had made 
      while at Nordgren&#8217;s to Mercadante Funeral Home &amp; Chapel. Mr. Mercadante 
      even went a gigantic leap further and declared I attempted to do the same 
      with at least one other funeral home in Worcester.</p>
    <p><strong>WOW! </strong></p>
    <p>Would you believe that while under oath and subpoenaed as a &#8220;hostile&#8221; 
      witness for my defense, Mr. Mercadante <em><strong>suddenly was unable</strong></em> 
      to remember the name of the other funeral director with whom he alleged 
      I had attempted to establish a financial arrangement with for the purpose 
      of bringing families that I had made arrangements with to that funeral home. 
      Mr. Mercadante also was unable to remember who had supposedly told him or 
      when he supposedly heard this. Hmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!</p>
    <p><strong>Read On!</strong></p>
    <p>What Mr. Mercadante failed to say to Bresnahan and what Fr. Michael Abdelahad, 
      Pastor of St. George Orthodox Cathedral witnessed and heard on two (2) separate 
      occasions was<em><strong> &#8220;Mr. Mercadante declaring he wanted to buy 
      the prearrangements I had made with Orthodox Families&#8221;. My response 
      on both occasions was &#8220;they are not for sale!&#8221; </strong></em></p>
    <p>(Was Mr. Mercadante&#8217;s unsolicited offer to buy pre-arrangements illegal 
      and in violation of the rules and regulations of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts?) 
      <br>
      What more did Bresnahan need? Why contact anyone else, especially the family? 
      All they could possibly do was to disprove Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s allegations 
      and assertions and that of his friend, Mercadante &#8211; and we wouldn&#8217;t 
      want that &#8211; so Bresnahan had all he needed in order to <u><em><strong>script 
      </strong></em></u>his investigation to support Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s complaint.</p>
    <p><strong>Or Did He?</strong></p>
    <p>Two (2) years and $2M of taxpayer dollars later (not including $700K on 
      my behalf), Mr. &amp; Mrs. Mangsen, while attending the Administrative Hearing 
      in Boston, witnessed and listened to the testimony of Edward Haddad and 
      Janet Forzley, wherein they declared under oath that the decision to transfer 
      the prearrangements for their loved ones was their decision and their decision 
      alone. I asked both Mr. Haddad and Mrs. Forzley if they had ever met, had 
      a conversation, or ever communicated with Mr. or Mrs. Mangsen. Their respective 
      responses &#8211; <strong>&#8220;NO!&#8221;</strong> I asked each to turn 
      around and take a look at the man and woman sitting behind them and did 
      they recognize either the man or woman? Their respective answers were <strong>&#8220;NO!&#8221;</strong> 
      I, then stated, &#8220;they are Mr. &amp; Mrs. Mangsen.&#8221;</p>
    <p>Neither Mr. nor Mrs. Mangsen looked at Mr. Haddad or Mrs. Forzley at that 
      moment; and my attention was focused on Attorneys Read and Alexander as 
      well as the Administrative Hearings Counsel, Colleton. You had to see the 
      look on each of their faces! At that moment, if not before, all three (3) 
      knew I was set up by Katherine Mangsen and any possibility for a fair, just, 
      and impartial investigation and hearing had been thwarted from the &#8220;get-go&#8221; 
      by Bresnahan, and Board Chairman, Kazlauskas&#8217;s statements and actions 
      and Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s baseless allegations and assertions.</p>
    <p>Mrs. Mangsen&#8217;s allegations and assertions, accepted as fact by a 
      biased and prejudiced State Board and its Chairperson as well as the Division 
      of Professional Licensure&#8217;s investigator, have been determined to 
      be false facts, wrongful facts, and disproved facts &#8211; for which her 
      husband has been publicly admonished by the Administrative Hearings Counsel. 
    </p>
    <p>It has been suggested to me that as this situation (dating back to November 
      19, 2003 to the present) is officially reviewed <strong>(and it will be)</strong>, 
      that Mrs. Mangsen allegations, assertions, assumptions, and actions taken 
      as a result thereof may well be &#8220;career ending&#8221; for as many 
      as 12 fairly high level state employees. </p>
    <p align="center"><img src="images/YeGods.jpg" width="207" height="87"></p>
    <p>I ask you, Mr. and Mrs. Mangsen &#8220;How does one live with this, knowing 
      they <em>unjustly destroyed not only their own names and reputations, but 
      the careers and livelihoods of several others</em>?&#8221;</p>
    <p>With Holy Week about to begin, and out of my deep respect for the meaning 
      and celebration of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, I have decided to wait 
      until <strong>Tuesday, April 10, 2007</strong> to present the next Update 
      &#8211; the subject &#8211; </p>
    <p><strong><em>Complaint EM-04-184<br>
      &#8220;More Allegations &#8211; All Disproved&#8221; What Now?</em></strong></p>
    <p>Respectfully,<br>
      Philip G. Haddad, Jr.</p>
    <p><a href="#top">Return To The Top of The Page &#187;</a></p></div>
<!--#include virtual="/includes/footr.shtml"-->



Anon7 - 2021