KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/justiceatwhatprice.c/archives/2005/07/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/justiceatwhatprice.c/archives/2005/07/20050714.shtml
<!--#include virtual="/includes/archive.shtml"-->


  <div id="main"> 
    <h3 class="title"><a name="top"></a>Update-July 14, 2005</h3>
	<div id="print" style="border: 1px dashed #BBBBBB; padding: 0 0 0 0.5em; margin-top: 0.5em;">
      <p><a href="#" onclick="window.print();return false;"><img src="/images/print.gif" width="19" height="17" border="0" align="bottom">  
        Print this page&#187;</a></p>
    </div>
    <p>As you know from previous updates, the issues before us are:</p>
    <ul>
	<li>Kurt and Katherine Mangsen, Nordgren Memorial Chapel terminated 
      my association at Nordgren&#8217;s, with no advanced notice, on November 
      19, 2003 (after 9 + years) while I was (and still am) a minority owner of 
      the funeral home.<br>
    <li>John J. Kazlauskas (now deceased), and then Chairman of the State 
      Board of Registration of Funeral Directors and Embalmers made vicious and 
      malicious accusations and allegations calling me a &#8220;carpetbagger and 
      a snake&#8221; and then saying &#8220;Excuse me, are we on the record?&#8221; 
      When he was told &#8220;Yes1&#8221;, Mr. Kazlauskas stated &#8220;I didn&#8217;t 
      say that! Can you delete that part, Kim?&#8221; just prior to my entering 
      a meeting with the State Board on December 9, 2003. Mr. Kazlauskas was advised 
      by all parties in attendance to recuse himself prior my being invited to 
      the meeting, which he did.<br>
    <li>I entered the meeting to what can only be described as a &#8220;hostile 
      environment.&#8221; As such, I asked if the meeting was being recorded? 
      The answer being, &#8220;Yes&#8221;, I asked for an audio copy of the proceedings 
      and was assured it would be available to me by a simple request; which was 
      made the very next day (December 10, 2003).<br>
    <li>Upon my leaving the meeting, Mr. Kazlauskas, then immediately assumed 
      the chairmanship of the meeting and proceeded to invite the Mangsen&#8217;s 
      and their attorney into the meeting; at which time he instructed the Mangsen&#8217;s 
      and their attorney in the process of formally filing complaints against 
      me. No mention was made by any member of the State Board or its counsel 
      that Mr. Kazlauskas&#8217;s remarks and subsequent &#8220;stepping aside&#8221; 
      from my participation at the meeting dictated that his participation in 
      the same matter in the presence of the Mangsen&#8217;s and their attorney 
      was unjust, unfair, and a violation of ethical standards.<br>
    <li>Within days Katherine Mangsen filed complaints with the State Board; 
      one being dated December 24, 2004 (the day before Christmas).<br>
    <li>On June 29, 2004 the State Board issued to me a Letter to Show 
      Cause indicating I had 21 days to request an adjudicatory hearing &#8211; 
      a time table I met.<br>
    <li>In the Letter to Show Cause, two of the complaints filed by the 
      State Board AS FACT, are, and I quote:<br>
    <li style="padding: 0 3em 0 3em;">In or about November and December 2003, while you were not affiliated 
      with any funeral home, you solicited customers of Nordgren Memorial Chapel 
      to transfer their pre-need contracts to other funeral homes&#8221; and the 
      next complaint &#8211;<br>
    <li style="padding: 0 3em 0 3em;">On at least one occasion after your termination from Nordgren Memorial 
      Chapel you attempted to enter into a financial arrangement with a licensed 
      funeral home for the PURPOSE OF REFERRING PRE-NEED CUSTOMERS TO THE FUNERAL 
      HOME in return for a portion of the revenue from the pre-need accounts.&#8221;<br>
    <li>After more than 9 months of evasive tactics by the State Board 
      and Division of Provisional Licensure, they were forced to release the name 
      of the funeral director(s) referenced in the Letter to Show Cause. The funeral 
      director referenced above and who filed the complaint against me is Kevin 
      Mercadante, Mercadante Funeral Home in Worcester.<br>
    <li>When the Division of Professional Licensure failed to release the 
      statement made by Mr. Mercadante, we requested a copy of the statement. 
      We were told no statement exists, other than Mr. Mercadante words to the 
      investigator, Mr. Bresnahan; and that if we wanted specifics we could interview 
      Mr. Mercadante ourselves.<br>
    <li>We appealed this unbelievable position and statement to the Administrative 
      Hearings Counsel, Ms. Anne Colleton.<br>
    <li>We have made three (3) appeals to Ms. Colleton, the Presiding Officer 
      assigned to conduct the hearing &#8211; the three (3) being:<br>
    <li style="padding: 0 3em 0 3em;">That the hearing be held in Worcester where the overwhelming number of 
      individuals to testify for both sides reside (the majority being elderly 
      and in fair to poor health) &#8211; DENIED!<br>
    <li style="padding: 0 3em 0 3em;">That as a result of Mr. Kazlauskas&#8217;s prejudicial and slanderous 
      remarks preceeding my appearance at the December 9, 2003 meeting of the 
      State Board, we requested an independent adjudicator be appointed to conduct 
      the hearing. DENIED<br>
    <li style="padding: 0 3em 0 3em;">And lastly that we be provided with a copy of the statement made by Mr. 
      Mercadante; a statement that was not recorded and yet the State Board and 
      Division of Professional Licensure have accepted Mr. Mercadante&#8217;s 
      verbal statement as factual. DENIED.<br>
    <li style="padding: 0 3em 0 3em;">All three (3) appeals were denied; yet I am told by Ms. Colleton that 
      &#8220;The Standard Adjudicatory Rules of Practice and Procedure ensure 
      the respondent will receive a fair and impartial adjudication of the matter.&#8221;</p>
	</ul>
    <p>Unfortunately, it doesn&#8217;t appear this is possible IN THIS CASE &amp; 
      CERTAINLY NOT IN MASSACHUSETTS.</p>
    <p> The Following Letter was sent to Governor Romney dated July 13, 2005 with 
      copies to the Attorney General, Inspector General, and Director, Office 
      of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulations.</p>
    <div class="insert"><p>July 13, 2005</p>
    <p> The Honorable Mitt Romney, Governor<br>
      Commonwealth of Massachusetts<br>
      State House, Room 360<br>
      Boston, Massachusetts 02133</p>
    <p>Dear Governor Romney:</p>
      <p><strong>Re: Correspondence forwarded to Ms. Lindstrom, dated February 
        10, 2005</strong></p>
      <p><strong>Correspondence forwarded to Attorney General Thomas Reilly dated<br>
        March 14, 2005</strong></p>
      <p><strong>Correspondence forwarded to Gregory Sullivan, Inspector General 
        dated<br>
        May 20, 2005</strong></p>
      <p><strong>(Copies enclosed)</strong></p>
    <p>Governor Romney, it is time you were made aware of a &#8220;miscarriage 
      of justice&#8221; that has ravaged the State Board of Registration of Funeral 
      Directors and Embalmers and now the Division of Professional Licensure. 
      I make this statement based solely on the facts in hand to prove my every 
      word and every statement I now make and have made in the aforementioned 
      correspondence documents herewith attached as part of this package.</p>
    <p>Actions taken by the State Board and the Division of Professional Licensure, 
      without benefit of a hearing and depriving me of my right to continue to 
      represent and serve the Eastern Orthodox Community of Central Massachusetts 
      at the time of a death in the family, is more than a travesty of justice. 
      The accusations made against be by my peers in the funeral industry are 
      as a result of jealousy and envy and nothing more. The Chairman of the State 
      Board at the time is on record as slandering me publicly to the State Board 
      prior to my voluntary appearance before the State Board, and I have the 
      audio tape of the slanderous and prejudicial remarks in my possession after 
      more than 9 months of asking for the tape from the State Board and Division 
      of Professional Licensure.</p>
    <p>Governor, the investigation was flawed from its inception. The investigator 
      was prejudiced from the outset by the Board Chairman. The complaints filed 
      by three (3) funeral directors were and remain self serving &#8211; for 
      they benefit from my being so-called &#8220;put on the shelf&#8221; until 
      the issues are addressed. The complaints issued to me by the State Board 
      are and continue to crumble by the moment in the hands of the State Board 
      and Division of Professional Licensure. The &#8220;witch hunt&#8221; (and 
      that&#8217;s what I told the State Board, it was 18 months ago) has now 
      become the &#8220;witch hunt cover-up&#8221; of colossal proportions.</p>
      <p><strong>Governor Romney<br>
        July 13, 2005<br>
        Page 2.</strong></p>
      <p>Governor Romney, I have great respect for the &#8220;System&#8221; and 
        protocol. I have patiently sat back as long as I can (more so than anyone 
        else would have) for justice to be served. I even created the web site 
        www.justiceatwhatprice.com and provided updates on the proceedings, while 
        the Orthodox Community of Central Massachusetts struggles to deal with 
        the loss of their loved ones and my inability to be there for them at 
        this time.</p>
    <p>I, and my capable attorneys from Bowditch &amp; Dewey, LLP of Worcester, 
      Framingham, and Boston, am frustrated by the unjust, unethical, unprofessional, 
      and irresponsible decisions that have been made by the State Board and the 
      Administrative Hearings Counsel in this matter. We requested that the Show 
      Cause Hearing (if it ever happens) be held in Worcester. The rationale being 
      that the majority of the witnesses we shall examine and those prosecution 
      witnesses are from the Worcester area, are elderly, are generally in poor 
      health (two coming from nursing homes, and one with multiple sclerosis); 
      and that traveling to Boston, hassling the traffic, and attempting to find 
      parking would be irresponsible and a major hardship for these seniors. Request 
      denied!</p>
    <p>The next request we made was for an independent adjudicator and the documentation 
      to support our request was, is, and remains fatal to the prosecutions position; 
      but not in the eyes of the Administrative Hearings Counsel. Denied!</p>
    <p>And lastly, decisions made and conclusions drawn have been done so without 
      documentation to support the conclusion. The Prosecuting Counsel and the 
      Administrative Hearings Counsel have indicated if we want statements made 
      by the funeral director(s) to support the conclusions drawn by the State 
      Board and Division of Professional Licensure (statements that do NOT exist 
      in any written format), we should conduct our own interviews with those 
      funeral directors making the accusations against me. HOW PREPOSTEROUS!</p>
    <p>Governor Romney, I am requesting of you as Governor, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 
      to forego the form letter your staff sends out indicating that you have 
      forwarded my letter to the responsible executive office staff for review 
      and response on your behalf. From experience, no response is forthcoming. 
      I ask that you or the appropriate experienced and competent staff member(s) 
      get directly involved in this matter; for the repercussions of the &#8220;colossal 
      conspiracy and NOW cover-up&#8221; I am alleging will go far beyond the 
      borders of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.</p>
      <p><strong>Governor Romney<br>
        July 13, 2005<br>
        Page 3.</strong></p>
      <p> I may be contacted at the following phone numbers for additional information, 
        and I hope and pray this matter, now brought personally to you, gets the 
        attention it rightfully deserves.</p>
    <p>Respectfully,</p>
      <p>Philip G. Haddad, Jr.<br>
        9 Kenwood Avenue<br>
        Worcester, MA 01605-1321</p>
      <p>(508) 852-0094 (home)<br>
        (508) 836-2600 (days)<br>
        (508) 868-0167 (cell)</p>
      <p>c.c. Thomas Reilly, <br>
        Attorney General, Commonwealth of Massachusetts</p>
      <p>Gregory Sullivan, <br>
        Office of the Inspector General, Commonwealth of Massachusetts</p>
      <p>Beth Lindstrom, <br>
        Director, Office of Consumer Affairs &amp; Business Regulations,<br>
        Commonwealth of Massachusetts</p>
      <p> Michael P. Angelini, Esq., Bowditch &amp; Dewey, LLP (Worcester Office)<br>
        Daniel P. Flynn, Esq., Bowditch &amp; Dewey, LLP (Worcester Office)</p>
	</div>
    <p><strong>Update scheduled for July 25th:</strong></p>
    <p><strong>present correspondence to and from the Leslie D. Alexander, Prosecuting 
      Counsel, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and correspondence to and from Anne 
      E. Colleton, Administrative Hearings Counsel, Division of Professional Licensure 
      &#8211; as initiated by my counsel, Daniel P. Flynn, Esq., Bowditch &amp; 
      Dewey, LLP.</strong></p>
    <p><a href="#top">Return To The Top of The Page &#187; </a></p>
    </div>
<!--#include virtual="/includes/footr.shtml"-->


Anon7 - 2021