KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/fryer/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/fryer/wsvcaba1.htm
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<head>
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
   <meta name="Generator" content="Corel WordPerfect 8">
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.61 [en] (Win95; I) [Netscape]">
   <title>Report to the American Bar Association, Section of Intellectual Property Law, on WIPO Design Conference -- A New Era in International Design Protection</title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#C0C0C0" link="#0000FF" vlink="#551A8B" alink="#FF0000">
REPORT
ON WIPO DESIGN CONFERNCE TO THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, SECTION ON INTELLECTUAL
PROEPRTY LAW - A NEW ERA IN INTERNATIONAL DESIGN PROTECTION
<p>It was my privilege to represent the ABA, Section of Intellectual Property
Law, at the WIPO Design Conference held in Venice, Italy, May 13-14, 2004.
This conference launched a new era in international design protection.
The conference was organized to provide world attention for the recently
operational (April 1, 2004) Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning
the International Registration of Industrial Designs and the importance
of design protection for each country. Section had participated in the
develop of the Geneva Act, for centralizing filing and procedures for design
patents, similar to what PCT and the Madrid Protocol do for utility patents
and trademarks, respectively.
<p>The two day design conference was divided into presentations by national
government officials responsible for administering design protection systems,
IP practitioners and industrial designers. I will mentioned first the designers,
as they helped us see that products have beauty and value created from
how they look. It is an important economic fact that needs to be understood.
Each of them stressed the important of education on improving product design
appearance, to help companies provide the most competitive products, and
for attorneys to provide effective design protection. The government officials
reported on the status of design protection which generally showed registration
increases. Ms. Lois Boland, Head of the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office
of Legislation and International Affairs, focused primarily on the success
of the design patent system. She pointed out that the Geneva Act preparation
was supported by the U. S, and the treaty was arranged to allow the U.
S. and other novelty examination countries to become members.
<p>Ms. Boland praised the work of the PTO Design Group for examining design
patents within time limits set by the Geneva Act, so that U. S. membership
would be workable. The PTO now had a 7.8 months average first office action
in a design patent application in Fiscal Year 2003, and a 13.9 months average
for the issuance of a design patent in that year. The PTO goal is an average
design patent issuance of 12 months. She indicated that the PTO should
have the legislative package ready for Congress on ratification of the
Geneva Act by this fall or at the latest the beginning of the next Congressional
term.
<p>A very good indication of the likely success of the Geneva Act was the
comment of Mr. Wubbo De Boer, President, Office for Harmonization in the
Internal Market, the EU trademark and designs registration office. His
personal view was that the EU soon would link up the Geneva Act and the
new EU Community Design Registration. This connection would help make the
Geneva Act essentially the world, one stop place for design registration
and developing common procedures. A number of government speakers indicated
that ratification was likely by their legislatures. Many practitioner who
spoke at this event favorably commented on the Geneva Act and supported
ratification.
<p>This conference confirmed that the next major step for improved international
design protection in the U. S. is to have the U. S. ratify the Geneva Act.
The Section and other U. S. IP professional organizations, law firms and
companies have the opportunity to take a leadership role in this effort
and their support is essential.
<p>For further information on this Design Conference, WIPO will be posting
some of the conference papers on their web site. It was stressed by the
WIPO that their web site has the latest information on the Geneva Act.
I will be glad to answer any questions than anyone may have concerning
the Design Conference I attended.
<p>William T. Fryer, III
<br>Professor
<br>University of Baltimore School of Law
<p>---------------------<a href="index.html"></a>
<p><a href="index.html">HOME</a>
<p><a href="ws2tc1.htm">Conditions of Use</a>
<p>Copyright 2005, All Rights Reserved
<br>&nbsp;
<p>This page was last updated on March 9, 2005
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021