|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/fryer/ |
Upload File : |
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name="Generator" content="Corel WordPerfect 8"> <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.61 [en] (Win95; I) [Netscape]"> <title>Benefits from Foreign Design Protection</title> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#C0C0C0" link="#0000FF" vlink="#551A8B" alink="#FF0000"> <center>FRYER INSTITUTE <p>GENEVA ACT OF THE HAGUE AGREEMENT <p>INFORMATION CENTER <p><font size=+1>GENEVA ACT (1999) OF THE HAGUE AGREEMENT</font> <br><font size=+1>CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL</font> <br><font size=+1>REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS</font> <br><font size=+1>(GENEVA ACT)</font></center> <p><br> <p>BENEFITS FROM FOREIGN DESIGN PROTECTION <p>1. Product appearance is being pirated as well as product function. Design patents and design registrations (collectively referred to as design patents), provide an effective way to help stop piracy. With a design patent and utility patent protecting a product, the extent of protection is substantially expanded. <p>2. In many countries the cost of obtaining a design patent is relative low, compared to a utility patent. The lower cost is due to the fact that there is no novelty examination, in most design protection systems. It may be cost effective to obtain design patents on many models of a product.. <p>3. In many countries design patents are obtained relatively promptly, because the application review is only for formalities. In many cases the registration is obtained without any need for a foreign attorney when the Geneva Act system is used. <p>4. In some cases design patents may add to the strength of a product image, enhancing the likelihood of a product appearance becomes a mark (trade dress). It will depend on national law what the affect is of a design patent on the rights to a subsequent mark for the same design. <p>5. Another major difference between systems where rights are granted only after novelty examination, and registration systems where there is no novelty ezam is the initial rights to obtain rights. The opposition or litigation cost can be significant, but this cost in focused on products designs that have proven maket value. Therefor the cost of regislation system filing is considerable less than in examination systems. Most of the foreign design protection systems are registration systems, and that approach seems to be the trend. The two types of systems were debated extensively at the preparatory meetings for the Hague Agreement treaty. Each group considered their approach more cost effective and better for their economies. <p>6. Most registration systems for design protection permit multiple designs in one application and the cost of more than one design in an application is considerable less then for the first design. The cost advantages for multiple design applications reduces the intial cost of design protection, allowing the design owner to select which designs are the ones to retaom active and challenge a competitor in an opposition or litigation. The different types of design protection systems suggest unique strategies that cannot be used in novelty examination countries. The Hague Agreement gives the user a lot of flexibility to combine these strategies at relatively reasonable costs. <br> <br> <p> <hr> <p>END OF DOCUMENT <br> <p><a href="WGAIHPA.htm">GENEVA ACT INFORMATION CENTER HOME</a> <p>This page was last updated on August 14, 2012 <p><a href="ws2tc1.htm">CONDITIONS OF USE</a> <p><a href="index.html">HOME</a> </body> </html>