KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/statelin/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/statelin/9901olsn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control Orders Revisions to Utility&#146;s
Divestiture Plan, Including Auctioning of Private Power Contracts</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a><img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" WIDTH="229" HEIGHT="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="15%" valign="top" align="center">
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="sl_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="2" cellpadding="8" width="15%" id="table1" bordercolor="#FFFF00" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map><img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p><a href="../searchpma.htm"><img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><strong><small><font face="Arial">About The Author:</font></small></strong></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial" style="font-size: 9pt">Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of
    Brown, Olson &amp; Gould, P.C. which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law,
    public utility law and related commercial transactions.</font></p>
    <p><small><font face="Arial"><font style="font-size: 9pt">He can be reached at:</font><br>
    <br>
    <b><font color="#0000FF">Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</font></b><br>
2 Delta Drive<br>
    Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301<br>
&nbsp;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
    (603) 225-9716<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></font></small></p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="45188" endspan --></td>
    <td width="68%" valign="top"><img src="../images/statelin.gif" alt="STATELINE by Robert Olson" border="0" WIDTH="375" HEIGHT="75"><p><b><u>
    <br>
    January 1999</u><br>
    <font face="Arial"><big><big><big>Connecticut Deparmtnet Of Public Utility 
    Control Orders Revisions To Utility's Divestiture Plan, Including Auctioning 
    Of Private Power Contracts<br>
    </big></big></big></font></b><strong>by Robert Olson&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Brown, Olson and Wilson, P.C.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
    01/99</em>)</font></p>
    <p><font face="Arial">In a
    draft decision, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (CDPUC) rejected the
    divestiture plan of Connecticut Light &amp; Power Company (CL&amp;P), a subsidiary of
    Northeast Utilities (NU), and ordered that specific modifications be submitted by January
    13, 1999. One of the ordered modifications requires that CL&amp;P package its private
    power provider (PPP) contracts with its generation assets for auction if it is unable to
    renegotiate them. Other modifications addressed administration of the auction, the
    potential sale of the assets to an NU affiliate, land use and environmental concerns, sale
    of a transmission-related generation facility, and conditions on the sale of the assets.</font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">Under the Connecticut restructuring act, utilities
    divesting themselves of nonnuclear generating assets are required to submit divestiture
    plans with the CDPUC. The restructuring act requires that all nonnuclear generation units
    be divested at public auction of the utility seeks recovery of stranded costs. The
    restructuring act also requires the utility to take all reasonable steps to mitigate its
    stranded costs. After tendering a Reverse Request for Proposals and renegotiating PPP
    contracts, CL&amp;P was able to renegotiate or buy out a small number of contracts,
    leaving most of the above-market contracts in place. CL&amp;P proposed to divest its PPP
    contracts by auctioning them simultaneously with its generating assets. </font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">The PPPs intervened in CL&amp;P&#146;s divestiture
    plan filing, and opposed CL&amp;P&#146;s plan to auction the contracts. The PPPs put forth
    a number of arguments challenging the plan: they asserted a state law right to have their
    contracts assigned to the distribution company and a modification negotiated; claimed the
    assignee of the contracts would pose a credit risk; claimed the administration would be
    more complex and riskier with a continuing question as to legal rights and obligations of
    CL&amp;P and the winning bidder; claimed the auction would not be commercially reasonable
    as there is no market for long-term qualifying facilities contracts; claimed the auction
    avoids good faith renegotiation of the contracts, in contravention to the restructuring
    act&#146;s requirement for the negotiation of such contracts or distribution company
    retention of such contracts; and claimed the intent of the restructuring act was that only
    generating assets be sold. </font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">The CDPUC did not specifically address the
    PPPs&#146; arguments. Rather, the CDPUC stated that because the restructuring act makes
    PPP contracts eligible for securitization and contains a requirement that all licensed
    suppliers demonstrate a certain percentage of their electric output is from renewable
    energy sources, renegotiation of the contracts is still a viable option. Therefore, the
    CDPUC rejected CL&amp;P&#146;s portion of the plan concerning auctioning of the PPP
    contracts and directed CL&amp;P and the PPPs to continue to negotiate in good faith. In
    the absence of successful negotiation, the CDPUC directed that the plan be modified such
    that the PPP contracts be packaged with the generation assets and sold at auction by the
    consultant hired by the CDPUC, and not auctioned by CL&amp;P. The CDPUC supported this
    revision to the plan, stating the CDPUC-overseen auction would ensure neutrality and
    fairness and provide the best opportunity to reduce the over-market pricing of the PPP
    contracts. </font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">Under the order, the CDPUC consultant will be
    supervised and directed by a team which will be effectively separate from the CDPUC.
    Because NU is permitted to bid on the assets, a code of conduct has been established to
    protect the integrity of the auction process. Employees on &quot;Buy Teams&quot; and
    &quot;Sell Teams&quot; within NU must abide by the code of conduct, and may not move from
    one team to the other.</font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">In addressing the environmental and land use
    concerns, the CDPUC approved a Memorandum of Understanding entered into by CL&amp;P and
    the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The CDPUC determined that some
    real estate would be withheld from auction and would be maintained by CL&amp;P with
    appropriate environmental protections. Many auctioned properties would be subject to land
    use or environmental easements pertaining to public recreation or the maintenance of fish
    restoration efforts or bird habitats. The CDPUC also required that successful bidders on
    FERC-licensed hydroelectric units would be subject to both the FERC license requirements
    pertaining to public and environmental use and the additional voluntary uses provided by
    CL&amp;P.</font></p>
    <p><font face="Arial">CL&amp;P also sought to retain a 68 MW generating facility for the
    purpose of maintaining reliability and voltage on the transmission system. The CDPUC
    rejected this portion of the plan and instead required the facility to be auctioned,
    stating that transmission constraints are the responsibility of the Independent System
    Operator. Additionally, the CDPUC rejected all of CL&amp;P&#146;s proposed sale
    conditions. The condition that a successful bidder must contract with NU&#146;s affiliate
    for generation support services was rejected as potentially decreasing bids. Furthermore,
    the condition was presented as fulfilling the restructuring act&#146;s policy of
    protecting CL&amp;P employees, however the CDPUC found its effect was to protect
    out-of-state NU employees. The condition that a successful bidder must be subject to a
    callback option under which assets sold would be required to supply CL&amp;P&#146;s
    standard offer requirements was rejected as potentially lowering bids and as unnecessary
    given the amount of available generation. The condition that preference be given to a
    single bidder if it agrees to purchase all the assets was rejected as raising market power
    concerns and as contrary to the restructuring act&#146;s preference for robust
    competition.</font></p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" u-include="sl_bottom.htm" tag="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <blockquote>
      <p align="left"><font face="Arial">
      <small>Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of Brown, Olson &amp; 
		Gould P.C.
      which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law, public utility law and related
      commercial transactions. He can be reached at:</small></font><p align="center">
      <font face="Arial"><small><font color="#0000FF"><b>Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</b></font><br>
2 Delta Drive, Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301 <br>
      <br>
      <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> | (603) 225-9716<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></small></font>
    
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="27861" endspan --><blockquote>
      <p align="left"><font face="Arial">
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div>

<p align="center"><a href="9901olsn.htm#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021