KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/statelin/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/statelin/9712olsn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>Mississippi Staff Proposes Retail Competition Transition Plan</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a><img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" WIDTH="229" HEIGHT="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="15%" valign="top" align="center">
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="sl_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="2" cellpadding="8" width="15%" id="table1" bordercolor="#FFFF00" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map><img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p><a href="../searchpma.htm"><img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><strong><small><font face="Arial">About The Author:</font></small></strong></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial" style="font-size: 9pt">Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of
    Brown, Olson &amp; Gould, P.C. which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law,
    public utility law and related commercial transactions.</font></p>
    <p><small><font face="Arial"><font style="font-size: 9pt">He can be reached at:</font><br>
    <br>
    <b><font color="#0000FF">Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</font></b><br>
2 Delta Drive<br>
    Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301<br>
&nbsp;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
    (603) 225-9716<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></font></small></p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="45188" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top"><img src="../images/statelin.gif" alt="STATELINE by Robert Olson" border="0" WIDTH="375" HEIGHT="75"><p><b><u>
    <br>
    <br>
    December 1997</u><br>
    </b><big><big><big><strong><font face="Arial">Mississippi Staff Proposes 
    Retail Competition Plan<br>
    </font></strong></big></big></big><strong>by Robert Olson&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Brown, Olson and Wilson, P.C.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
    05/98</em>)<br>
    <br>
    </font><font face="Arial">The Mississippi Public Utilities Staff recently issued a
    &quot;Proposed Transition Plan for Retail Competition in the Electric Industry&quot;, at
    the request of the state Public Service Commission. The Plan would introduce retail
    competition into the Mississippi electric power market beginning on January 1, 2001. The
    Plan focuses primarily on the principal investor-owned electric utilities operating in the
    state, Entergy Mississippi, and Mississippi Power Company, a Southern Company subsidiary.
    The state&#146;s many municipal utilities and electric power associations would be
    permitted to choose whether or not to participate in retail competition, in recognition of
    limitations imposed by the Rural Utilities Service, long-term power contracts, IRS
    tax-exempt financing rules and the relationship of many such public power suppliers to the
    federal Tennessee Valley Authority. </font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">The proposed staff schedule for the transition
    period calls for the investor-owned utilities to unbundle rates by January 2000. As of
    January 1, 2000, certified &quot;energy service providers&quot; could initiate the process
    of bilateral contracting. A bilateral contracts model is recommended by the staff as
    opposed to the creation of a statewide or regional independent system operator. Each of
    the investor-owned utilities would be required to divide into at least three functionally
    separate entities, including an energy services provider affiliate, a transmission and
    distribution affiliate and a system operator affiliate. Each company&#146;s affiliate
    system operator would manage its electric transmission system in a non-discriminatory and
    equitable manner. The various affiliates would operate under strict codes of conduct
    designed to prevent affiliate abuse in the sharing of information, cross-promotion,
    corporate identification and anti-tying. The distribution rates of the wires affiliates
    would continue to be regulated by the Public Service Commission according to the
    state&#146;s performance-based rate regulation standards. </font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">The staff is most concerned with the retail market
    power of Entergy and Mississippi Power, which it deems to be a &quot;rebuttable
    presumption&quot;. The companies would be required to establish the absence of excessive
    market power within their respective service territories or to propose appropriate
    mitigation measures. If excessive retail market power cannot be mitigated by a company,
    then it would not be permitted to provide default standard offer service to retail
    customers within its territory and such service would be subject to a competitive bidding
    process. </font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">Under the staff Plan, alternative energy service
    providers would be certified by the Commission, upon an adequate showing of reliability
    and creditworthiness, for which specific criteria are set forth in the Plan. In addition,
    the proposed Plan would require energy service providers to &quot;commit reliable capacity
    to a minimum share of the small customer market before being allowed access to the large
    customer market.&quot; Energy service providers would also be required to comply with
    numerous consumer protection provisions.</font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">Stranded cost recovery by utilities would be
    permitted by the Commission on a case-by-case basis upon petition by a utility. Recovery
    of &quot;any net, verifiable, prudent, non-mitigable losses&quot; would be effected
    through the collection of a &quot;competitively neutral&quot;, non-bypassable wires charge
    during the transition period (expected to run from January 1, 2001 through December 31,
    2004). Utilities would not be required to divest their generation assets through third
    party sales, but would be required to undertake all practicable steps to mitigate losses,
    including the exercise of any termination or release clauses in existing power contracts,
    the renegotiation or buyout of power contracts that do not have termination or release
    clauses or the auction of power purchase contract rights. The staff Plan maintains that
    &quot;exit fees and securitization are recovery mechanisms that should not be adopted
    because of their anti-competitive characteristics.&quot;</font></p>
    <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">The staff has set forth a detailed implementation
    schedule for its transition plan, with hearings and rulemaking proceedings to begin in
    late 1997 and run through 1999. The staff also indicates its belief that legislation is
    required to authorize the Public Service Commission to implement retail competition, and
    that such legislation must be enacted in 1999 in order for the schedule set out in the
    Plan to be followed.</font></p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" u-include="sl_bottom.htm" tag="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <blockquote>
      <p align="left"><font face="Arial">
      <small>Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of Brown, Olson &amp; 
		Gould P.C.
      which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law, public utility law and related
      commercial transactions. He can be reached at:</small></font><p align="center">
      <font face="Arial"><small><font color="#0000FF"><b>Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</b></font><br>
2 Delta Drive, Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301 <br>
      <br>
      <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> | (603) 225-9716<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></small></font>
    
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="27861" endspan --></tr>
</table>
</center></div>

<p align="center"><a href="9712olsn.htm#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021