|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/enrgy/statelin/ |
Upload File : |
<html>
<head>
<title>New Hampshire: PUC Rules That Utilities With Rates Above The Regional Average Will
Not Recover Full Stranded Costs</title>
</head>
<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
<tr>
<td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a><img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" WIDTH="229" HEIGHT="100"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div><div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
<tr>
<td width="15%" valign="top" align="center">
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="sl_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<table border="2" cellpadding="8" width="15%" id="table1" bordercolor="#FFFF00" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">
<tr>
<td width="100%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
<area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map><img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p><a href="../searchpma.htm"><img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
<p align="left"><strong><small><font face="Arial">About The Author:</font></small></strong></p>
<p align="left"><font face="Arial" style="font-size: 9pt">Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of
Brown, Olson & Gould, P.C. which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law,
public utility law and related commercial transactions.</font></p>
<p><small><font face="Arial"><font style="font-size: 9pt">He can be reached at:</font><br>
<br>
<b><font color="#0000FF">Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</font></b><br>
2 Delta Drive<br>
Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
(603) 225-9716<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></font></small></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="45188" endspan --></td>
<td width="69%" valign="top"><img src="../images/statelin.gif" alt="STATELINE by Robert Olson" border="0" WIDTH="375" HEIGHT="75"><p><b><u>
<br>
<br>
April 1997</u><br>
</b></p>
<p><big><big><big><strong>New Hampshire: PUC Rules That Utilities With Rates
Above The Regional Average Will Not Recover Full Stranded Costs<br>
</strong></big></big></big><strong>by Robert Olson -- Brown, Olson and Wilson, P.C.<br>
</strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
05/98</em>)</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Arial">On February 28, 1997, the New Hampshire Public
Utilities Commission ('PUC') issued its final restructuring plan (the 'Plan') providing,
in part, that public utilities with rates in excess of New England regional average rates
cannot recover all of their stranded costs. Public Service Company of New Hampshire and
Northeast Utilities (collectively referred to as 'PSNH') have filed suit against the State
of New Hampshire (the 'State') in Federal District Court, requesting that the Court enjoin
the Plan. <br>
<br>
<b>The Plan</b> <br>
The Plan requires utilities to divest generation assets and purchased power arrangements
if the utility wishes to be distribution company in the competitive market. The Plan views
such divestiture as necessary to eliminate the market power of vertically integrated
utilities. <br>
<br>
Regarding recovery of stranded cost, the Plan distinguishes between utility costs incurred
due to management discretion and those costs due to either federal or state governmental
mandate. Utilities will be given an appropriate opportunity to fully recover stranded
costs associated with governmental mandates. Recovery of stranded costs that resulted from
management discretion are limited by comparing the individual utilities' retail rates to
the average New England rates. Electric utilities with rates above this average will not
recover all of their stranded costs. The Plan reasons that less than full recovery for
such utilities is fair because they have failed to deliver on their promise of efficient
service and shareholders of utilities with rates exceeding the regional average did not
have a reasonable expectation of full stranded cost recovery. <br>
<br>
The Plan also states that the use of the regional average rate approach, as opposed to a
cost-based ratemaking approach, is a fair way to gauge the reasonable expectation of
utility's shareholders because in New Hampshire electric utilities always faced the
prospect of retail competition. Thus, utilities with the highest electric rates should
have reasonably anticipated their vulnerability to competition. <br>
<br>
The Plan states that existing purchase power obligations from qualifying facilities
('QFs') will be assumed by the distribution company. The power generated by QFs may be
used by the distribution company in providing service to residential and small commercial
customers that either have not selected their own power supplier or who are between
selection of power suppliers. If the distribution company requires additional power to
provide this service, it is directed to purchase power through competitive bids or spot
market purchases. <br>
<br>
The Plan also requires the state's utilities to file retail transmission tariffs with FERC
as a condition to making sales in the competitive market place. <br>
<br>
The Plan does not establish any specific registration requirements for competitive power
suppliers, but does note that such requirements should provide incentives for suppliers to
behave responsibly. The Plan directs the PUC staff to establish a working group to develop
appropriate registration requirements. Federal Court Action <br>
<br>
On March 3, 1997, PSNH filed a complaint with the Federal District Court requesting that
the Court enjoin the Plan. The complaint states that the Plan would require PSNH to
write-off approximately $400 million of regulatory assets carried on its books pursuant to
Financial Accounting Standard ('FAS') 71. PSNH alleges that such a write-off is required
because the Plan does not use a cost-based ratemaking process as required by FAS 71
eligibility requirements. Such a write-off may cause PSNH to seek bankruptcy protection.
The Court issued a temporary restraining order preventing enforcement of the Plan as it
affects the FAS 71 issue. The Court on March 20, 1997 issued a further restraining order
staying indefinitely the Plan as it applies to PSNH. In addition, the Court ordered briefs
to be filed by March 28, 1997 on the issue of whether the Court should abstain and permit
the PUC and the New Hampshire courts to resolve the dispute. The Court has the matter
under consideration. PUC Actions and Rehearing <br>
<br>
On March 19, 1997, the PUC stayed the portion of the Plan which PSNH claimed would require
it to write-off approximately $400 million of regulatory assets, pending further
consideration of the issue. On March 31, 1997, all the state's utilities filed motions for
rehearing with the PUC, requesting that the PUC reconsider and revise the Plan and raising
a number of constitutional and statutory issues, including claims that the order creates a
taking of property by requiring and allowing use of utility transmission facilities and
that the order violates the FERC's authority over transmission of power. The PUC has not
yet acted on these motions or the motions for rehearing filed by a number of non-utility
parties to the docket. </font></p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" u-include="sl_bottom.htm" tag="BODY" startspan -->
<hr color="#FFFF00">
<blockquote>
<p align="left"><font face="Arial">
<small>Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of Brown, Olson &
Gould P.C.
which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law, public utility law and related
commercial transactions. He can be reached at:</small></font><p align="center">
<font face="Arial"><small><font color="#0000FF"><b>Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</b></font><br>
2 Delta Drive, Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301 <br>
<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> | (603) 225-9716<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></small></font>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="27861" endspan --></tr>
</table>
</center></div>
<p align="center"><a href="9704olsn.htm#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>