KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/statelin/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/statelin/9702olsn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>New York Public Service Commission Authorizes Monitoring of QF Qualifying Facility
Status</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a><img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" WIDTH="229" HEIGHT="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="15%" valign="top" align="center">
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="sl_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="2" cellpadding="8" width="15%" id="table1" bordercolor="#FFFF00" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map><img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p><a href="../searchpma.htm"><img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><strong><small><font face="Arial">About The Author:</font></small></strong></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial" style="font-size: 9pt">Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of
    Brown, Olson &amp; Gould, P.C. which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law,
    public utility law and related commercial transactions.</font></p>
    <p><small><font face="Arial"><font style="font-size: 9pt">He can be reached at:</font><br>
    <br>
    <b><font color="#0000FF">Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</font></b><br>
2 Delta Drive<br>
    Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301<br>
&nbsp;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
    (603) 225-9716<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></font></small></p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="45188" endspan --></td>
    <td width="69%" valign="top"><img src="../images/statelin.gif" alt="STATELINE by Robert Olson" border="0" WIDTH="375" HEIGHT="75"><p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b><u>April 1997</u><br>
    </b><big><big><big><strong><font face="Arial">New York Public Service 
    Commission Authorizes Monitoring Of QF Qualifying Facility Status<br>
    </font></strong></big></big></big><strong>by Robert Olson&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Brown, Olson and Wilson, P.C.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
    05/98</em>)</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Arial">On January 9, 1997, the New York Public Service
    Commission (PSC) reaffirmed its prior decision that the monitoring of qualifying facility
    (QF) status by public utilities does not violate the Public Utility Regulatory Policies
    Act (PURPA). In addition, the PSC ordered the state&#146;s utilities to monitor QF status
    on an annual basis. The monitoring program approved by the PSC involves acquisition of
    information similar to that contained in FERC Form 556, which is the form used by QFs for
    self-certification under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulations. <br>
    <br>
    On August 30, 1996, the PSC initially ruled that utilities were authorized to institute
    monitoring programs to insure that QFs complied with the PURPA standards. Several QF
    developers filed rehearing motions, asserting that the PSC was not authorized to implement
    such a program. One QF asserted that the PSC&#146;s power to implement PURPA ended with
    the formation of the power contract between the utility and the QF and that the
    utility&#146;s rights to information were limited to the contract terms. In addition, a QF
    asserted that the monitoring program constituted utility-type regulation expressly
    prohibited by the PURPA regulations.<br>
    <br>
    The utilities responded to the rehearing petitions by asserting that the authority for the
    monitoring program emanates from PURPA. In addition, the utilities noted that a QF
    monitoring program would not impair any of the QF power contracts because the contracts
    are premised on the assumption that the individual QFs will maintain their QF status.<br>
    <br>
    In its January order, the PSC denied the rehearing requests concluding that a monitoring
    program does not constitute utility-type regulation because such a program is designed to
    elicit information regarding a QFs compliance with the QF standards. The PSC also reasoned
    that PURPA authorizes the individual states to take any actions necessary to implement
    PURPA and that implementing a monitoring program is within this grant of authority. The
    PSC also stated that the monitoring program would not impair a power contract between QF
    and a utility because PURPA contemplates QF compliance with the PURPA regulations.<br>
    <br>
    Regarding the specific terms of the monitoring programs, the PSC ordered that a QF should
    provide the purchasing utility on an annual basis with information sufficient to satisfy
    the self-certification requirements contained in FERC Form 556. The PSC also ruled that if
    the information provided to the utility raises concerns about compliance with, or if a
    utility has reasonable grounds to believe a QF does not meet the QF standards, then the QF
    must submit detailed backup information to determine whether QF compliance has actually
    been achieved. The PSC recognized that this backup information could contain commercially
    sensitive information and therefore ruled that the information would either be provided to
    the purchasing utility pursuant to a confidentiality agreement or that the QF could
    provide such information to an independent auditor, approved by the utility. In cases
    where this confidential information is provided to the auditor, the auditor&#146;s report
    must aggregate or otherwise disguise this confidential information so that the report is
    as complete as possible and the commercially sensitive nature of the information is
    protected. The PSC denied a utility's request that it be permitted to design its own
    monitoring program, ruling that all QF monitoring programs must be uniform. The PSC also
    ruled that the monitoring requirement would begin as of January 1, 1994. Among the reasons
    cited by the PSC for beginning the monitoring program in 1994 was that it balanced the
    interests of the QF in avoiding the burden of submitting data for prior years and that the
    PSC had rejected a similar monitoring program in 1993.<br>
    <br>
    The PSC also stated that the monitoring program would not include insuring compliance with
    the 80 MW output limitation because this issue is the subject of an ongoing proceeding. </font></p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" u-include="sl_bottom.htm" tag="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <blockquote>
      <p align="left"><font face="Arial">
      <small>Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of Brown, Olson &amp; 
		Gould P.C.
      which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law, public utility law and related
      commercial transactions. He can be reached at:</small></font><p align="center">
      <font face="Arial"><small><font color="#0000FF"><b>Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</b></font><br>
2 Delta Drive, Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301 <br>
      <br>
      <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> | (603) 225-9716<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></small></font>
    
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="27861" endspan --></tr>
</table>
</center></div>

<p align="center"><a href="9702olsn.htm#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021