KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/statelin/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/statelin/0310olsn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>October 2003: New York Law Restricting Emissions Trading Preempted by 
Federal Law</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="15%" valign="top" align="center">
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="sl_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="2" cellpadding="8" width="15%" id="table1" bordercolor="#FFFF00" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map><img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p><a href="../searchpma.htm"><img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><strong><small><font face="Arial">About The Author:</font></small></strong></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial" style="font-size: 9pt">Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of
    Brown, Olson &amp; Gould, P.C. which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law,
    public utility law and related commercial transactions.</font></p>
    <p><small><font face="Arial"><font style="font-size: 9pt">He can be reached at:</font><br>
    <br>
    <b><font color="#0000FF">Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</font></b><br>
2 Delta Drive<br>
    Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301<br>
&nbsp;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
    (603) 225-9716<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></font></small></p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="45188" endspan --></td>
    <td width="69%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/statelin.gif" alt="STATELINE by Robert Olson" border="0" width="375" height="75">
</center><p align="left"><b><u><br>
    October 2003</u><font size="6"><br>
    New York Law Restricting Emissions Trading 
    Preempted by Federal Law<br>
    </font></b><strong>by Robert Olson&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Brown, Olson and Wilson, P.C.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
200</em>3/</font><font size="2">11/01</font></p>
    <center>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family:Arial">The U.S. Court of Appeals 
    for the Second Circuit (the &#8220;Court&quot;) recently upheld a lower court decision 
    to permanently enjoin enforcement of </span>
    <span style="font-family:
  Arial">New York</span><span style="font-family:Arial">&#8217;s Air Pollution 
    Mitigation Law, N.Y. Pub. Serv. L. � 66-k (Section 66-k&quot;). Clean Air Markets 
    Group v. Pataki, 338 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2003) (the &quot;Opinion&quot;). The Court 
    determined that enforcement of Section 66-k would interfere with the 
    emissions trading system established under Title IV of the Clean Air Act 
    Amendments of &nbsp;1990 (&quot;Title IV&quot;), 42 U.S.C. �� 7651-7651o, and that Section 
    66-k was therefore preempted by federal law.</span></p>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family:Arial">As explained in the Opinion, 
    Congress enacted Title IV to reduce acid rain &nbsp;caused by emissions of sulfur 
    dioxide. &nbsp;To that end, Title IV created a &quot;cap-and-trade&quot; system under which 
    electric-generating utilities each receive a certain number of sulfur 
    dioxide emissions &quot;allowances&quot; annually. Each allowance represents one ton 
    of sulfur dioxide. The aggregate of all allowances issued per year is 
    reduced in each successive year, and the allowances are transferable. The 
    intent is for polluters for whom emissions reductions are relatively 
    expensive to buy allowances from polluters for whom emissions reductions are 
    relatively cheap, thereby achieving the greatest overall reduction of 
    emissions at the least overall cost. The cap-and-trade system does not take 
    into account the geographic location of the buyers and sellers of emissions 
    allowances.</span></p>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family:Arial">According to the Opinion, 
    acid rain has been especially problematic in the Adirondack region of New 
    York. Much of the acid rain that falls in the Adirondacks is caused, not by 
    sulfur dioxide emissions from New York utilities, but rather by emissions 
    from fourteen so-called &quot;upwind&quot; states (New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, 
    Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia, Ohio, 
    Michigan, Illinois, Kentucky, Indiana and Wisconsin). From New York&#8217;s point 
    of view, the benefit of emissions reductions achieved in New York may be 
    offset or negated by any increase in emissions in the upwind states. The New 
    York legislature enacted Section 66-k with this issue in mind.</span></p>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family:Arial">Section 66-k provides that 
    any New York utility that sells sulfur dioxide emission allowances to a 
    utility in any of the fourteen upwind states must pay an &nbsp;assessment equal 
    to 100% of the amount received for the allowance. The assessment also 
    applies when a New York utility&#8217;s emissions allowances are subsequently 
    transferred to an upwind state. As the Court explained, the effect of this 
    restriction is to prevent the transfer of allowances of New York utilities 
    to utilities in the upwind states. </span></p>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family:Arial">New York argued that Section 
    66-k would not conflict with Title IV because it advances Title IV&#8217;s 
    ultimate purpose of protecting natural resources. The Court disagreed on the 
    ground that, even if the ultimate goal of both the state and federal 
    legislation is the same, Section 66-k is still preempted because it 
    &nbsp;&nbsp;interferes with the method by which the federal statute sought to achieve 
    the goal, that is, through a national allowance trading system. In support 
    of its conclusion, the Court pointed to specific language in the statute, 
    which permits the transfer of allowances to &quot;any other person who holds such 
    allowances.&quot; The Court also pointed to the legislative history of Title IV, 
    which indicates that Congress specifically considered and rejected proposed 
    geographic restrictions.</span></p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" u-include="sl_bottom.htm" tag="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <blockquote>
      <p align="left"><font face="Arial">
      <small>Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of Brown, Olson &amp; 
		Gould P.C.
      which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law, public utility law and related
      commercial transactions. He can be reached at:</small></font><p align="center">
      <font face="Arial"><small><font color="#0000FF"><b>Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</b></font><br>
2 Delta Drive, Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301 <br>
      <br>
      <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> | (603) 225-9716<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></small></font>
    
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="27861" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
</table>
  </div>

<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021