KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/statelin/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/statelin/0309olsn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>September 2003: Northeastern States Prevail in Lawsuit to Apply Clean Air 
Act Requirements to Old Power Plant in Ohil</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="15%" valign="top" align="center">
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="sl_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="2" cellpadding="8" width="15%" id="table1" bordercolor="#FFFF00" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map><img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p><a href="../searchpma.htm"><img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><strong><small><font face="Arial">About The Author:</font></small></strong></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial" style="font-size: 9pt">Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of
    Brown, Olson &amp; Gould, P.C. which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law,
    public utility law and related commercial transactions.</font></p>
    <p><small><font face="Arial"><font style="font-size: 9pt">He can be reached at:</font><br>
    <br>
    <b><font color="#0000FF">Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</font></b><br>
2 Delta Drive<br>
    Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301<br>
&nbsp;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
    (603) 225-9716<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></font></small></p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="45188" endspan --></td>
    <td width="70%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/statelin.gif" alt="STATELINE by Robert Olson" border="0" width="375" height="75">
</center><p align="left"><b><u><br>
    September&nbsp; 2003</u><font size="6"><br>
    Northeastern States Prevail in 
    Lawsuit to Apply <br>
    Clean Air Act Requirements 
    to Old Power Plant in Ohio</font></b><strong><br>
    by Robert Olson&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Brown, Olson and Wilson, P.C.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
200</em>3/09/26</font></p>
    <center>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family: Arial">Connecticut, New Jersey, 
    New York and the United States recently won a lawsuit in federal court over 
    applicability of the federal Clean Air Act (the &quot;Act&quot;), 42 U.S.C. �� 7401 et 
    seq., to an old coal-fired electric generating facility operated by Ohio 
    Edison Company (&quot;Ohio Edison&quot;). United States of America v. Ohio Edison 
    Company, No. 2:99-CV-1181, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13799 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 7, 
    2003). Among other things, the Act requires installation of pollution 
    control devices on major stationary sources of air pollution constructed or 
    modified after promulgation of regulations implementing the Act. 42 U.S.C. � 
    7411(a). Ohio Edison&#8217;s W.H. Sammis Station plant in Ohio (the &quot;Sammis 
    Plant&quot;) was constructed before passage of the Act and would therefore not be 
    subject to the Act&#8217;s requirement for installation of pollution control 
    devices unless subsequently &quot;modified.&quot; Under applicable regulations, 
    modification does not include &quot;routine maintenance, repair and replacement.&quot; 
    See 40 C.F.R. � 52.21(b)(2)(iii)(a). At issue in the case was whether eleven 
    construction projects undertaken on seven electric generating units at the 
    Sammis Plant constituted &quot;routine maintenance, repair and replacement.&quot;</span></p>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family: Arial">The court determined that 
    the projects did not constitute &quot;routine maintenance, repair and 
    replacement&quot; and that the requirements of the Act do apply to the Sammis 
    Plant.</span></p>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family: Arial">In making its 
    determination, the court focused on whether the changes made to the Sammis 
    Plant were &quot;routine.&quot; Following the Environmental Protection 
    Administration&#8217;s (&quot;EPA&quot;) own four-part test, the court considered (1) the 
    nature and extent of the activity, (2) the purpose of the activity, (3) the 
    frequency of the activity, and (4) the cost of the activity. Regarding the 
    nature and extent of the activity, the court found that the projects 
    involved replacement or upgrade of major boiler components. The court found 
    that the purpose of the activity was to increase the availability and 
    reliability of the electric generating units and extend the life of each 
    unit approximately thirty years. Regarding frequency, the court found that 
    the component and equipment replacements had, in almost all cases, never 
    been performed on the units before and, given the purpose of extending unit 
    life thirty years, were unlikely to be made more than once or twice in a 
    unit&#8217;s lifetime. The court found that the cost of each of the eleven 
    projects ranged from $1 million to $33 million, and totaled $136.4 million. 
    Under these facts, the court held that the projects could not be considered 
    &quot;routine maintenance, repair and replacement.&quot;</span></p>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family: Arial">The court rejected Ohio 
    Edison&#8217;s argument that whether an activity is routine should be evaluated in 
    light of the types of activities performed in the industry as a whole. 
    Instead, the court approved of the EPA&#8217;s approach, which takes industry 
    practice into account only with respect to consideration of the frequency of 
    the activity. Even with respect to frequency, the court found industry 
    practice to be a less important consideration than the frequency with which 
    the activity has been performed on the particular unit in question.</span></p>
    <p align="left"><span style="font-family: Arial">The court has deferred 
    consideration of penalties and injunctive relief to a separate, remedy phase 
    trial to commence in March of 2004. The court&#8217;s opinion indicates that the 
    remedy phase will involve a broader, equitable analysis, taking into 
    account, among other things, economic impact, employment consequences, and 
    inconsistencies in the EPA&#8217;s application and enforcement of the Act over the 
    years.</span></p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" u-include="sl_bottom.htm" tag="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <blockquote>
      <p align="left"><font face="Arial">
      <small>Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of Brown, Olson &amp; 
		Gould P.C.
      which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law, public utility law and related
      commercial transactions. He can be reached at:</small></font><p align="center">
      <font face="Arial"><small><font color="#0000FF"><b>Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</b></font><br>
2 Delta Drive, Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301 <br>
      <br>
      <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> | (603) 225-9716<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></small></font>
    
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="27861" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
</table>
  </div>

<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021