KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/statelin/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/statelin/0110olsn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>October 2001: Louisiana State Representative Files Suit Against the 
Louisiana Board of Commerce and Industry</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="15%" valign="top" align="center">
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="sl_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="2" cellpadding="8" width="15%" id="table1" bordercolor="#FFFF00" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map><img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p><a href="../searchpma.htm"><img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><strong><small><font face="Arial">About The Author:</font></small></strong></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial" style="font-size: 9pt">Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of
    Brown, Olson &amp; Gould, P.C. which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law,
    public utility law and related commercial transactions.</font></p>
    <p><small><font face="Arial"><font style="font-size: 9pt">He can be reached at:</font><br>
    <br>
    <b><font color="#0000FF">Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</font></b><br>
2 Delta Drive<br>
    Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301<br>
&nbsp;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
    (603) 225-9716<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></font></small></p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="45188" endspan --></td>
    <td width="70%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/statelin.gif" alt="STATELINE by Robert Olson" border="0" width="375" height="75">
</center><p align="left"><b><u><br>
    October 2001</u>
    <br>
    <span style="font-family: Palatino; color: black"><font size="6">Louisiana State 
    Representative Files 
    Suit
    Against the Louisiana 
    Board of Commerce and Industry</font></span></b><span style="font-family: Palatino; color: black; font-weight: 700"><font size="6">
    <br>
    </font>
    </span><strong>by Robert Olson&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Brown, Olson and Wilson, P.C.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
200</em>2/01/19)</font></p><center>
    </p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">Last 
    month&#8217;s Stateline reported that Louisiana&#8217;s Board of Commerce and Industry 
    (the &#8220;board&#8221;) granted property tax exemption status to merchant power 
    plants.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">On 
    October 3, State Representative Melvin L. &#8220;Kip&#8221; Holden filed suit against 
    the Board and Attorney General Richard P.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">Leyoub 
    in the 19th Judicial District Court to contest this decision. The suit 
    requests the court to mandate that the Board cease practices that violate 
    Louisiana statutes and the state Constitution, according to Rep. Holden, or 
    show cause as to why they are not in violation. If the court agrees, Rep. 
    Holden&#8217;s request means that the Board would be required to find that 
    merchant plants are not eligible for property tax exemptions.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">The 
    Board&#8217;s decision to permit merchant power plants to receive property tax 
    exemptions was based on the Board&#8217;s determination that merchant power plants 
    fell under the definition of &#8220;manufacturing establishments,&#8221; which are 
    allowed to receive tax exemptions under existing state law. The issue 
    surrounds the definition of &#8220;manufacturing establishment&#8221; contained in the 
    Louisiana Constitution.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">The 
    definition states: The terms &#8220;manufacturing establishment&#8221; and &#8220;addition&#8221; as 
    used herein mean a new plant or establishment or an addition or additions to 
    any existing plant or establishment which engages in the business of working 
    raw materials into wares for use which gives new shapes, qualities or 
    combinations to matter which already has gone through some artificial 
    process.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">La. 
    Const. Art. VII, &#8217;21 (F); Holden Writ at &amp;5. The Board has authority to 
    grant tax exemptions based on the criteria set forth in Section 21 quoted 
    above. As reported in last month&#8217;s Stateline, in August the Board amended a 
    rule to include merchant power plants in the definition of &#8220;manufacturing 
    establishments.&#8221; Thus defined, merchant power plants were then allowed to 
    receive credit for property taxes equal to 10% of their capital investment 
    over the first 10 years of operation and to apply for such exemption prior 
    to plant construction.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">Rep. 
    Holden claimed in his suit that the definition under the Louisiana 
    Constitution had already been interpreted by a case previously brought by 
    him in 1997, which made the same tax exemption challenge regarding the 
    granting of an exemption to a hazardous waste plant. In that case, the 
    facility combusted hazardous material and resulted in the production of 
    hazardous ash which was landfilled. In that case Holden argued that because 
    the incinerator ash was still a hazardous substance, it was not &#8220;suitable 
    for use&#8221; as set forth in the Section 21 Constitutional definition. Thus, the 
    specific issues in that case were whether the &#8220;suitable for use&#8221; requirement 
    applied to raw materials made into consumer goods and whether establishments 
    that change the shape or quality of material or the combination of material 
    must also make the changed material &#8220;suitable for use&#8221; to meet the 
    constitutional definition of &#8220;manufacturing establishment.&#8221; On December 28, 
    1998, the court issued an order in the first case brought by Rep. Holden and 
    ruled that the facility did not meet the constitutional definition. In 
    making its decision, the court looked to the source of the constitutional 
    definition. The source of the definition was a case, decided in 1882 that 
    defined manufacturer in relation to producing something for a consumer or 
    dealer. The court reasoned that, although the facility did sell and profit 
    from the incineration process, the facility did not create a product from 
    the incinerated ash that could be sold for consumer use.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">The 
    court concluded that the facility did not fall within the constitutional 
    definition of a manufacturing establishment.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">In his 
    current case, Rep. Holden claims that the prior court&#8217;s interpretation of 
    &#8220;manufacturing establishment&#8221; applies to the determination of whether 
    merchant power plants are manufacturing establishments. With regard to two 
    recent recipients of tax exemptions, Entergy Thermal, LLC and Carey Salt 
    Co., Rep. Holden claims that the Board has ignored the prior court&#8217;s &#8220;clear 
    interpretation&#8221; of the state constitution when granting these tax 
    exemptions. Further, Rep. Holden claims that the Board&#8217;s actions have, 
    created an uneven playing field between companies that meet the 
    constitutional definition and those who do not, and deprived local 
    governments of millions of dollars for &#8220;police and fire departments, public 
    works, schools, libraries, recreation, lighting districts and even courts.&#8221; 
    Writ at &amp; 14.</span></p>
    <center>
    <center>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span style="font-family: Palatino">Rep. 
    Holden&#8217;s suit does not address the Board&#8217;s actions in light of a resolution 
    passed in both the Louisiana House and Senate &#8220;to urge and request&#8221; the 
    Department of Economic Development, of which the Board is a part, to develop 
    strategies and incentives to encourage merchant power development. The 
    hearing for this case is scheduled for October 19, 2001.</span></p><center>
<center><center>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="sl_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <blockquote>
      <p align="left"><font face="Arial">
      <small>Robert A. Olson is a partner in the law firm of Brown, Olson &amp; 
		Gould P.C.
      which maintains a nationwide practice in energy law, public utility law and related
      commercial transactions. He can be reached at:</small></font><p align="center">
      <font face="Arial"><small><font color="#0000FF"><b>Brown, Olson & Gould, PC</b></font><br>
2 Delta Drive, Suite 301<br>
Concord, NH 03301 <br>
      <br>
      <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> | (603) 225-9716<a href="mailto:[email protected]"></a></small></font>
    
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="27861" endspan --><hr color="#FFFF00">
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>
  </div>

<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021