|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/enrgy/feldman/ |
Upload File : |
<html>
<head>
<title>The New Domestic Privatization</title>
</head>
<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
<tr>
<td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a><img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" WIDTH="229" HEIGHT="100"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div><div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
<area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
<a href="../searchpma.htm">
<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
<p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
<br>
</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon
Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and
energy projects and companies for 40 years. In particular, he has analyzed
and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings. He
chairs the American Bar Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and
Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy,
and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration. He is
a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left"> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
<td width="75%" valign="top"><img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" WIDTH="375" HEIGHT="75"><p><b><u>April 1998</u><br>
<br>
<font face="Arial" size="6">THE NEW DOMESTIC PRIVATIZATION</font></b></p>
<p><strong>by Roger Feldman -- Bingham, Dana and Gould, P.C.<br>
</strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
05/98</em>)</font></p>
<p><font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2"> <br>
<br>
</font><font face="Arial">Privatization has swept the rest of the
world. U.S. power privateers are in the thick of seeking pieces of newly available power
systems. Is the U.S. next?</font></p>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">What will become of the rural electric coops?
Perhaps it seems an arcane question, until we recall that 7.4% of all generation and no
less than 45.7% of the nation’s power lines reside in these entities. Currently, they
are subject to a congerie of FERC (mostly transmission, unless they have paid off all
Federal loans); Rural Utilities Service ("RUS"), the old REA; State Utility
Commission; and (in many jurisdictions) self regulation. Certainly they are at most a
secondary focus of the newly released Administration energy plan - indeed of most open
market plans that have surfaced. As far as the GAO is concerned, the RUS - serviced sector
amounts to a fiscal mess to be cleaned up: future federal loans should be targeted to the
most sparsely populated areas; financially stable borrowers should be chased off the
program; means tests, loan limits and delinquent borrower restrictions should be
instituted. The RUS belt may be ripe for picking.</font></p>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">What will become of the public power sector? It
received a reprieve from competitive obscurity when the IRS liberalized restrictions on
the private use of electric facilities financed by tax exempt bonds - an opportunity, say
the IOUs, for muni competition fueled by cheap money at the expense of the consumer. That
move has now, however, come under Congressional attack, however, from the House Ways and
Means Chair. The Chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee is now friend
either: his earlier proposal for restriction of muni competition is still on the table.
Privatization promises to thrive in formerly public markets.</font></p>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">For private power "sooners", blooded
overseas by the opportunities created by privatization, deregulation sounds like the
gunshot to occupy the territory. After all, private power exported PURPA, discovered
privatization, and now may be able to import it to America under a new name: competition.
Most of the action to date has been on the capture by private firms of large C&I
customer classes; these markets have the earmarks of an opportunity to pursue large and
stable residential loads as well, from stakeholders in some ways less well equipped to
defend them than IOU competitors.</font></p>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">Perhaps - but it is a strategy which will take time
to unfold and even could begin to backfire. Certainly not all municipalities have
concluded that divestiture is the way to go. The Large Public Power Council is fighting
back. Its emphasis is that the pressure on muni bonds is actually more generally on public
jurisdictions: as states restructure, competitive pressures are forcing many municipals to
choose between refinancing their bonds at considerable cost or violating the private Use
restrictions. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is a good example of a large urban
utility that is getting lean so as to be competitive in its new deregulated environment.
And Memphis, which seemed on the verge of privatization, has pulled back from what its
Mayor termed a divisive issue (and what its consultant termed "hysteric"). </font></p>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">On the coop front, Glenn English, NRECA’s
Chairman proclaimed "Any place that grass is growing is rural to me." With that
in mind, he sought to bring into the fold traditional adherents to the coop principal who
had found electric religion in the age of deregulation: an alliance of California
agricultural producers and a beehive of New York coop apartment dwellers. His brethren,
however, were not prepared, as yet, to move as fast as he: they did not admit the new
acolytes to the rural electric congregation. But change may be anticipated.</font></p>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">Because beyond these fits and starts of non-private
sector guerilla resistance to privatization, true drumbeats of organized resistance -
strength through numbers - has begun to materialize. Both coops and munis are turning to
aggregation purchasing alliances; to collaborative dispatch efforts; to product branding;
to efforts to utilize consumer contract and confidence to diversify in short to emulation
of the private sector with an added "public interest" confidence overlay.</font></p>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">So far those pursuing the privatization strategy,
the prospect is one of promise and a threat: The promise, of course, is that new public or
quasi-public markets can be opened up. The threat is that the public interest focus of the
public/cooperative sector can gain public favor and put a damper on private sector
ambition, by throwing it into clear relief.</font></p>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font face="Arial">What will become of the "new
privatization"? It’s too soon to jump to conclusory judgments. In the U.S. there
is competitive juice in the old public entities yet.</font><font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2"></p>
</font><!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<hr color="#FFFF00">
<p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews
Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related
to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40
years. In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and
substantial value of project financings. He chairs the American Bar
Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board
of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official
in the Federal Energy Administration. He is a graduate of Brown University,
Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div>
<p align="center"><a href="9804flmn.htm#top"><img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>