KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/feldman/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/feldman/0710flmn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>October 2007: Big Green / Big Blue / Big U</title>
<style>
<!--
h1
	{margin-top:0in;
	margin-right:0in;
	margin-bottom:12.0pt;
	margin-left:.5in;
	text-align:justify;
	text-indent:-.5in;
	tab-stops:list .5in;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman Bold";
	}
-->
</style>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
	<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
	<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
	<a href="../searchpma.htm">
	<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
	<br>
	</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
	ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon 
	Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and 
	energy projects and companies for 40 years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed 
	and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He 
	chairs the American Bar Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and 
	Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy, 
	and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is 
	a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
	<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left">&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top">
	<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p align="left"><b><u><br>
      October 2007</u></b></p>
	<p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Big Green / Big Blue / Big U</b></font></p>
    <p><strong>by Roger Feldman&nbsp; --&nbsp;&nbsp;
    </strong><b>Andrews Kurth, LLP</b><strong><br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine 
    Magazine: 2008/01/26</em>)<br>
    </font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
    &nbsp;</span></p>
    <div>
		Big Green has been filling its scrap book with reports of global 
		conferences, movie star catharses as to global warming&#8217;s meaning, and 
		clean tech investment reports shooting the moon. Big Green seeks to 
		combat The Dark Force -- hydrocarbon fuel -- Big Black -- which 
		simultaneously has the temerity to be rising in price in America, 
		soaking our atmosphere with heat absorbing carbon emissions, and 
		lobbying fiercely for market position. So, like every righteous movement 
		before it in history, Big Green -- frustrated by lack of progress -- has 
		turned to governmental power to overcome its adversaries.<p>It is not 
		surprising to find Herman Scheer, a leading philosopher of the renewable 
		energy movement saying:</p>
		<dir>
			<dir>
				<p>Those favoring a strict neoliberal economic ideology will 
				argue that the state should not interfere in markets, yet 
				history shows that the market has hardly ever functioned without 
				the state . . . for democratic countries, governments 
				subsidizing renewables and alternatives could reflect the 
				desires of many of that nation&#8217;s constituents.</p>
			</dir>
		</dir>
		<p>Nor should we be surprised, however, to find this principle utilized 
		and stood on its head by proponents of Big Blue: demand for nuclear 
		power is on the increase. More than $200 billion will be spent by 2030 
		on harnessing the atom for energy output. By 2050 India expects to have 
		25% of its energy provided by nuclear power. And the resurgence of 
		nuclear energy is being not merely theorized but emerging in a proposed 
		new wave of plants licensed by the NRC, the NRC promising an expedited 
		licensing period, and utility sponsors financially abetted by a loan 
		guarantee program that was part of the last Energy Act and which may may 
		be enlarged by future legislation. &#8220;A Second Act for Nuclear Power&#8221; 
		trumpets the <u>Wall Street Journal</u>. No less than the former EPA 
		head Christie Todd Whitman has been pressed into service by the nuclear 
		industry&#8217;s multi-million dollar public relations campaign. No less than 
		the author of last year&#8217;s bestselling book, <u>Freakonomics,</u> mocks 
		the China Syndrome fears of nuclear cores falling through the Earth. 
		Even leading environmental groups, their eyes squarely fixed on 
		greenhouse gas issues (rather perhaps than on the global safety ball) 
		have begun to note the emissionless, lower volume impact which nukes can 
		have.</p>
		<p>Dismayed by this development, Big Green loyalists have reverted 
		immediately to their historic role: that of protectors of the Earth 
		against marauders of the environment. Once again, and not without 
		reason, the anti-nuclear arguments are being assembled and updated for 
		the 21st century: security against sabotage and terrorism, lack of 
		stringent nuclear industry oversight, nuclear waste risks, dangers 
		exacerbated by the effect of cost overruns. And finally, as it was at 
		the beginning of the green movement, an appeal to the &#8220;big tent&#8221; theory 
		of global warming control: &#8220;prudence dictates that we pursue many 
		options to reduce global warming,&#8221; states a Union of Concerned 
		Scientists spokesman, &#8220;as part of that effort, nuclear power research 
		should continue, but with a focus on enhancing safety security and waste 
		disposal.&#8221; Mollifying the incipient beast with spurious pluralism: 
		&#8220;look, everyone can play, let&#8217;s all be friends,&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work that well 
		in the hardball energy game.</p>
		<p>But there are other issues with which Big Green must deal with Big 
		Blue. Popular moods and governmental trends are fickle forces in a 
		capital-driven democracy. If renewables are to have a sustained place at 
		the table there are ultimately two hard realities they must face: 
		economic competitiveness and institutional regulation. Pandora&#8217;s Box of 
		government interventionism in the name of global warming control has 
		been opened -- but the emerging whirlwind can be colored green or blue, 
		depending on which side prevails.</p>
		<p>Renewables can only be cheap and large enough to fit the electric 
		utility industry regulatory framework if they offer up, in addition to 
		distributed energy, big concentrated power, abetted by energy storage, 
		which can serve utility baseload purposes. AEP, the nation&#8217;s largest 
		user of coal (as well as payor of mega-fines), certainly doesn&#8217;t think 
		the concentrated solar scenario will work today. As its chairman says 
		with reference to solar energy: &#8220;Is the land there? Yes. Is it practical 
		now? I don&#8217;t think so.&#8221; Nevertheless some utilities, like PGE and FP&amp;L 
		are, to fill part of their baseload requirements, beginning to look 
		toward larger scale solar utility companies that Silicon Valley Venture 
		Capitalists have backed. Whether concentrated solar power (CSP) will 
		achieve the magic figure of $10 per kilowatt hour is still problematic 
		-- but at least it is focused on the issue which will make Big Green 
		sized growth of more sustainable dimensions than photovoltaics can 
		obtain. Doing so helps to overcome the observation which John O&#8217;Donnell, 
		the solar zealot driving CSP developer Austra has articulated, &#8220;a lot of 
		people in the environmental community can&#8217;t count.&#8221; Diffused, variable 
		sourced energy streams just can&#8217;t stand up to Big Blue; they barely can 
		make their voices heard over Big Bad Old Black.</p>
		<p>But willingness to come to terms with economics is not enough. The 
		reality for renewables is that they must find favor with the utility 
		industry which still forms the spine of this our Central Station Nation. 
		Utilities are not, as environmentalists may sometimes cast them, 
		inherently evil polluters in pursuit of profit. But they are decidedly 
		tropistic toward least-cost solutions to power supply (which includes, 
		for them, their sunk infrastructure costs). That tropism can be tweaked 
		by imposition of extra costs for internalized externalities, like cap 
		and trade, or by mandatory standards. But economic evolution certainly 
		seems more likely to occur best when there is an alignment of manmade 
		laws and the applicable principles of economics. That would be the case, 
		if a regulatory system in the US were focused on giving utilities the 
		ability to be indifferent to being producers or consumers of power; to 
		recover costs and have adequate rate recovery when they are renewable 
		producers; to be able to entertain distributed generation renewables 
		options with prospects of economically effecting and/or recovering 
		transmission costs; and to contemplate being rewarded as &#8220;prudent&#8221; if 
		they do so as well as being concerned with being slapped on the wrist if 
		they do not. Big Blue seems to be sneaking up on Big Green because its 
		characteristics were once perceived to be -- and some credibility is 
		being restored that they may again be for the regulated utility industry 
		-- consistent with this model. Global warming reduction through Big Blue 
		use really may be for the Big U the modern day rationalization for an 
		otherwise potentially preferable centralized supply solution.</p>
		<p>And so Big Green would be advised to focus on its tie-in to this 
		regulatory model, whether through utilities or providers to them -- 
		through technology, cost reduction, or appropriate ratemaking 
		structures. It is only through the equation of the regulated 
		marketplace, not the abstract calculus of regulatory costs and benefits, 
		that Big Green can ultimately sustain its current position in the sun. 
		One thing US energy history confirms: never underestimate the &#8220;Big U&#8221; 
		factor in shaping the ultimate profile of events.</p>
		<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
	<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews 
	Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related 
	to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40 
	years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and 
	substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He chairs the American Bar 
	Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board 
	of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official 
	in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Brown University, 
	Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></div>
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center>

<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021