KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/feldman/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/feldman/0701flmn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>January 2007: Surge Control</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
	<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
	<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
	<a href="../searchpma.htm">
	<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
	<br>
	</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
	ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon 
	Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and 
	energy projects and companies for 40 years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed 
	and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He 
	chairs the American Bar Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and 
	Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy, 
	and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is 
	a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
	<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left">&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top">
	<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p align="left"><b><u><br>
      </u></b><u><b>January 2007</b></u></p>
	<p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Surge Control</b></font></p>
    <p><strong>by Roger Feldman&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine 
    Magazine: 2008/01/05</em>)<br>
    </font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
    &nbsp;</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" align="left">Suddenly it&#8217;s 1970.&nbsp; There&#8217;s a war going 
	on that is increasingly unpopular.&nbsp; Nuclear power is coming back.&nbsp; Air 
	pollution (in the guise of global warming) is on the tips of everyone&#8217;s 
	tongues.&nbsp; The price of oil is skittering around without real connection to 
	underlying fundamental cause of daily events.&nbsp; We&#8217;re even talking about 
	&#8220;energy independence&#8221; again.&nbsp; But now we are in the age of surges. . . </p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">In addition to the Iraq surge, the 
	President also has resolved to end -- by surge -- the threat to our energy 
	security.&nbsp; Thus, we have a domestic surge to build new power plants, coal 
	and nuclear.&nbsp; TXU, for example, has announced plans for ten new coal 
	plants.&nbsp; Texas will need them and the coal is at hand.&nbsp; Texas may have wind, 
	biomass, and solar in profusion, but these technologies simply are not up to 
	filling the perceived gap.&nbsp; A comparable issue faces much of the nation; 
	&nbsp;the nuclear licensing option is picking up speed as a way around GHG 
	problems associated with coal.</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">In the face of these developments the new 
	Very Green Congress has been talking about the potential of conservation to 
	provide &#8220;safe surge,&#8221; but the right formula for mobilizing it -- the tool, 
	for example, to reduce power usage nationwide -- does not appear to be self 
	evident.&nbsp; Nor have renewables, by themselves, nationally offered up a 
	&#8220;highly confident&#8221; formula for stepping into the gap.</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">So there are three issues presented which, 
	if not aggressively resolved, could leave the Green proponents in a position 
	similar to the engaged peace supporters:&nbsp; engaged but without a single plan 
	to cap the upcoming surge.&nbsp; Proposed legislation in this regard raises three 
	issues:</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: -.5in; margin-left: .5in" align="left">
	<span style="font-family: Symbol">�<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
	</span></span>Should there be Federal standards for utilities&#8217; mandatory use 
	of renewables, and/or mandatory use of efficiency measures, and/or mandatory 
	reduction of hydrocarbons for environmental reasons?</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: -.5in; margin-left: .5in" align="left">
	<span style="font-family: Symbol">�<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
	</span></span>Should more than one of these standards (versions of which are 
	floating around the hill) pass through Congress, could their interaction 
	somehow be coordinated, so as to get the results of Federal standards all 
	pointing in the same direction?</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: -.5in; margin-left: .5in" align="left">
	<span style="font-family: Symbol">�<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
	</span></span>Even if there are no such Federal standards and we are left 
	with multiple state standards, can there be mechanisms for meshing the 
	transfer of legal rights associated with such standards (e.g., RECs, white 
	tags, efficiency credits) through some type of trading regime?</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">There also remains a pragmatic question:&nbsp; 
	if none of the types of the foregoing Federal standards are forthcoming from 
	Congress, are the existing incentives (mostly from EPACT) sufficient to 
	drive major private sector activity toward meaningful movement away from 
	hydrocarbons?</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">Directly affecting the answers to these 
	questions are two substantive issues which have not been explored 
	adequately:&nbsp; </p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Do the uses of conservation and 
	renewables (such as solar) fully complement each other, such that their 
	application can be marketed as part of a simultaneous energy reduction and 
	production solution?&nbsp; Is it reasonable therefore for the convergence of 
	solar and energy efficiency to be promoted through revised governmental 
	incentives?</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If solar and energy efficiency 
	are for the most part separable alternatives, not strongly complementary 
	ways to reduce energy consumption and/or reduce hydrocarbon production, does 
	this suggest that a different set of policy incentives should be promoted?</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">There exist, in the world of energy 
	efficiency, separate trade associations, separate existing and proposed 
	legislative titles, different types of corporate and project sponsors, and 
	different measurements technologies as to performance.&nbsp; As in the 
	environmental sphere, there necessarily are different protocols as to when 
	displacement of undesirable pollutants can be achieved and credits realized.</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">All of this being the case, how can the 
	present &#8220;surge&#8221; to hydrocarbons be offset by incantation of the value of 
	energy efficiency and renewables?&nbsp; Professional silos for each projected 
	energy/environmental reduction solution are being arrayed against integrated 
	articulation of industrial needs to which traditional utility suppliers are 
	only too glad to respond by conventional means.</p>
	<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">In short, there is a need for a force 
	which through the green policy void fuses renewables and conservation.&nbsp; It 
	is not a role which the FERC has the legal power to play:&nbsp; it might even 
	cross cut FERC&#8217;s rearguard fight for deregulation/open access in some 
	regards.&nbsp; Perhaps dealing with issues is the best expenditure to which 
	scarce energy and environment R&amp;D funds should be applied.&nbsp; The line item 
	entry in the Federal budget might make it more acceptable politically to the 
	Legislative Branch: &#8220;Surge Control,&#8221; or the resulting public relations 
	campaign slogan&nbsp; might make it more blog marketable:&nbsp; &#8220;Less juice, more 
	filling. . . &#8220;</p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
	<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews 
	Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related 
	to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40 
	years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and 
	substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He chairs the American Bar 
	Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board 
	of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official 
	in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Brown University, 
	Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center>

<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021