|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/enrgy/feldman/ |
Upload File : |
<html>
<head>
<title>August 2006: Mini-Merchant Maximization</title>
</head>
<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
<tr>
<td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
<img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
<area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
<a href="../searchpma.htm">
<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
<p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
<br>
</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon
Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and
energy projects and companies for 40 years. In particular, he has analyzed
and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings. He
chairs the American Bar Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and
Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy,
and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration. He is
a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left"> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
<img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
August 2006</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Mini-Merchant Maximization</b></font></p>
<p><strong>by Roger Feldman -- Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
</strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine
Magazine: 2</em>006/10/27)<br>
</font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
</span></p>
<font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
<font SIZE="3">
</font>
<i></i>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">As the lazy, hazy, crazy days of summer, of August 2006
threatened to turn into August 1914, official Washington took leave of its
energy policy making duties for a while. True, oil was approaching $80 a
barrel, domestic security threat incidents were seriously increasing, and
public opinion was swinging to the view that US energy policy was affecting
the warming of the planet. No matter, maybe EPACT would be further amended
or US ingenuity would pull a cellulosic ethanol rabbit out of the hat.</p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">Nature abhors a vacuous thought bubble, and therefore coming
forward again battered but unbowed are the proponents of the racehorse
Distributed Generation (“DG”) bred out of Total Energy, and claimed
forbearer of Renewable Energy. The thought returns: maybe a MW saved is a MW
earned and a barrel of oil not imported, or C02 not exhausted into the
atmosphere. But there is a twist; there are trends to allow entrepreneurs to
maximize the opportunities created by these mini-merchants.</p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">These are trends, now tenderly afoot which could, with
appropriate cultivation, actually be fostered by government to enhance DG.
The most important, identified in a recent Distributed Energy Financial
Group’s recent market survey is the continued change in the regulatory
environment. The first trend that naturally comes to mind are “renewable
portfolio standards.” However, this is a very blunt instrument indeed, if
the objective is energy efficiency through DG. The top driver, in actuality,
is innovative rate making.</p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">Why is that? We are at an inflection point in the power
plant development cycle. There is again an emerging need for new capacity.
There is an increasing desire for industry. The new era of rate cases is
also upon us — hunkered down in their “back to basics” mode, utilities have
cut costs, but now need regulatory approvals to raise the funds to pay for
delayed investments (not the least of which is efficient T&D) and for new
growth opportunities (including construction and acquisitions). Moreover,
the withering of the deregulation rate caps rose has thrust them back into
the public eye along with the economically justified need for increased
rates, the more so since rate increases have gotten caught up on the latest
post-PURPA consolidation lunge.</p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">It is in this emerging rate case context that the role of DG
as a sop to regulators, as an actual or alleged source of cost reduction,
and as a first cousin of incentive-worthy renewables, is achieving
attention. As a result, taken together with EPACT-mandated rate proceeding
related requirements, greater attention is being paid to demand response,
demand management, and energy efficiency. Not surprisingly, this is true in
the same regions that previously drank deepest of the deregulation kool aid,
in an effort to contain costs. These are all trends associated with existing
technologies, in which investments can be made near term; implicit
government credit support (and sometimes loan guarantees and guaranteed
incentives) can be provided; financial results can be obtained. In the right
scale, and with the right ratio of capital expenditures to savings, DG can
become a type of activity merchants can become interested in.</p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">Besides need and greed, the other great motivator is fear —
a commodity in great supply these days. Increasingly there is recognition
that a robust backbone grid (central stations, long distance transmission)
does not address the particular vulnerability of high population and
industrial centers, special reliability situations (telecom, chip makers),
and continuous operation of key protection centers (hospitals, police
stations, key utilities). Flash briefly on the havoc we have seen done with
pinpoint bombing as well as indiscriminate natural hazards, and the
importance of these concerns is clear.</p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">Concern with system vulnerability has led to renewed
attention to micro-grids: the tying of multiple devices together and
operation of them as a utility with storage, power electronics and advanced
automation. Utilities are not cut out of the power loop by such arrangements
— they maintain the customer interface. The story of DG is a story of power
companies’ lack of interest if not opposition to efforts in this field. Now
practical reasons for its support are surfacing.</p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">Some of this interest comes from the new concern with the
security of energy facilities, derived and still driven by national security
applications. Interruption of power at a base can affect bases worldwide.
Sandia Labs has activily been at work on this issue. Micro-grid hardening
has been found to be an expensive, difficult solution, whose very complexity
would serve to further endanger reliability. It is the micro-grid which has
been found to be best responsive to distribution system security. Work is
being done specifically to beef up the storage and other capabilities which
optimize micro-grid “surety,” e.g. diversely located “agentbased” control
systems that cannot be easily disabled. Of course, putting aside technical
issues, it’s easier to do things by fiat in the military community than by
consensus in the civilian community. There is no comparable military mission
managed by a base commander. But there is in the military experience the
model of how a market can be created — always a matter of the greatest
interest to those of the merchant disposition. </p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">DG just won’t happen, even though from a public policy
standpoint, it absolutely should. Both from a macro energy security
standpoint and from the standpoint of on-the-ground physical security.
Merchant developers (which may include large firms) would profit from a DG
boom, as well as would transactional entrepreneurs. Therefore it is
appropriate to focus on what collectively is needed to make it happen
— governmental action. </p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">A few thoughts in this regard: Suppose Congress supplemented
its follow up on the State Demand Response Programs under EPACT (described
in this column last month), with a program to mandate (and perhaps also
incentivize) state DG/DR incentives. Suppose there was a direction to Sandia
Labs to assist applicant governmental jurisdictions in doing this. Suppose
RTO’s were incentivized to focus on micro-grid coordination as well as
traditional grid coordination. Or suppose at least there were a Federal
Commission to make recommendation in these regards. Suppose this effort was
limited to a “white tag” program to which DG and environmental activities
were linked. </p>
<p ALIGN="LEFT">“Micro-merchants” maximization of the several trends
identified above would be the response.</p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<hr color="#FFFF00">
<p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews
Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related
to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40
years. In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and
substantial value of project financings. He chairs the American Bar
Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board
of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official
in the Federal Energy Administration. He is a graduate of Brown University,
Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"> </td>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
<p align="center"> </p>
</body>
</html>