KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/feldman/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/feldman/0603flmn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>March 2006: Quick QF Quiz Show</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
	<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
	<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
	<a href="../searchpma.htm">
	<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
	<br>
	</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
	ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon 
	Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and 
	energy projects and companies for 40 years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed 
	and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He 
	chairs the American Bar Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and 
	Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy, 
	and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is 
	a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
	<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left">&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top">
	<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
      March 2006</u></b></p>
    <p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Quick QF Quiz Show</b></font></p>
    <p><strong>by Roger Feldman&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine 
    Magazine: 2</em>006/04/01)<br>
    </font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
    &nbsp;</span></p>
    <font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
    <font SIZE="3">
    </font>
    <i></i>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">In our wacky wi-fi world, 
    game show formats have gained increasing currency. The trend has now spread 
    to this column.<br>
    <br>
    Question. Is FERC:</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">(1) Dispensing regulatory 
    candy to RTOs?<br>
    (2) Appeasing Congressional legislative authors as to its interpretive 
    abilities?<br>
    (3) Selling out to the utilities by effectively trimming future QF 
    development?<br>
    (4) All of the above</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">These are the unhappy 
    questions that are being increasingly asked after review of FERC&#8217;s recent 
    Order No. 671. The answer to this &#8220;Quick QF Quiz&#8221; is found in italics at the 
    end of this column.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">In the process of 
    implementing the amendments to PURPA, enacted by Section 1253 of the Energy 
    Policy Act of 2005 (&#8220;EPACT&#8221;), the FERC may be slamming the door on any kind 
    of &#8220;competition&#8221; except some dimly remembered fossilized version of Standard 
    Market Design to which the FERC is clinging vainly. In doing so, FERC will 
    jeopardize the surge of innovation which renewables now promise and the 
    significant addition to national reliability which distributed generation 
    could provide - each of which is important to national security. From a 
    broader commercial standpoint, the costs and time required to be created for 
    merchant undertakings of projects of these types will re-erect the very 
    barriers to entry which Congress has declined to endorse, despite utility 
    industry pressure. In fact, barriers to which FERC has in fact been 
    sensitive to in other contexts such as market power. Here are some clues to 
    the answer to this Quick QF Quiz.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">FERC has promulgated 
    Docket No. RM0G-10-000, implementing new PURPA Section 210(m) with respect 
    to those &#8220;new&#8221; qualifying cogeneration facilities under the significantly 
    modified Section 210 of the Federal Policy Act, which Congress was willing 
    to allow to keep standing. For the most part, in that regard, FERC was doing 
    its duly: Congress moved to quash &#8220;PURPA machines&#8221; without justifiable 
    thermal load purposes. FERC complied. It eliminated the utility ownership 
    requirements, and shortly hedged the arguably abused self certification 
    requirements.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">However, FERC also 
    construed EPACT&#8217;s direction to review the broad exemptions of QFs under 
    Section 210(e) of PURPA, which included PUHCA (no small matter at the time 
    of PURPA&#8217;s enactment), the Federal Policy Act and state laws. At the time, 
    FERC asserts, these exemptions worked to remove the disincentives to utility 
    type regulations&#8221;; now, however QF sales should be subject to Sections 205 
    and 206. Why? Because then there was no market for electricity generators 
    but now such new wholesale markets have developed to the point that they are 
    unnecessary. Policing market power impacts in this supposedly crisp new 
    standardized world will not require a showing to FERC that QFs - even the 
    bobtailed type still permitted post - EPACT - lack &#8220;market power&#8221; (a 
    demonstration which is an expensive and time consuming proposition). Only a 
    fragment made up of state jurisdictional sales and perhaps really smaller 
    QFs (under 5 MW) escape this filing requirement.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">FERC&#8217;s related Order No. 
    671 goes further &#8211; paradoxically by making a contrary assumption. Even after 
    Section 205 filing has been made by a QF, there remains the matter of rates: 
    the crux of the business model for QF development . Order No. 671 implements 
    the new PURPA statutory requirement that removes the mandatory purchase 
    obligation which provides in essence that no utility mandatory purchase 
    obligation exists either (i) in mandatory day ahead auction markets exist or 
    (ii) where an RTO exists and FERC determines that meaningful opportunity to 
    sell within that RTO &#8220;exists, taking into account evidence of transactions 
    within the relevant market&#8221;.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">From this base, the FERC 
    made a terrific leap: a preliminary finding that QFs inter - connected with 
    certain named ISOs or RTOs were not entitled to benefit from PURPA&#8217;s 
    mandatory requirements. No market power there. A ringing SMD - like 
    endorsement of RTOs, at the very time in its recently issued Notice of 
    Inquiry regarding transmission the Commission is raising concerns about 
    continued discriminatory behavior. In effect the message to utilities is: 
    join an RTO, and your problems with QF sales are ended. In addition to 
    scrapping the mandatory purchase programs, FERC offers no assurance as to 
    how just and reasonable nature of backup rates to QFs will be set, in this 
    market-rate driven paradise.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">Quick QF Quiz Answer:</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">Overall, the presumption 
    that QFs have non-discriminatory access to long term contracts in organized 
    markets - which, thereby, of course restricts evidence of discriminatory 
    utility behavior against them - is regulatory candy to the utilities in 
    exchange for modest relative RTO enhancement. It also has the appearance of 
    FERC appeasement of Congressional critics after the lambasting it took for 
    showing creativity in the new PUHCA rules.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">The winning answer 
    therefore is &#8220;All of the Above&#8221;.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">Now for some &#8220;Instant 
    Jeopardy&#8221;.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">The answer is: a wide 
    range of cost effective, energy efficient QF applications.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">The question is: Who is 
    the loser here?</p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
	<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews 
	Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related 
	to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40 
	years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and 
	substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He chairs the American Bar 
	Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board 
	of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official 
	in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Brown University, 
	Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center>

<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021