|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/enrgy/feldman/ |
Upload File : |
<html>
<head>
<title>December 2005: WWDD-2006 Preamble</title>
</head>
<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
<tr>
<td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
<img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
<area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
<a href="../searchpma.htm">
<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
<p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
<br>
</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon
Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and
energy projects and companies for 40 years. In particular, he has analyzed
and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings. He
chairs the American Bar Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and
Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy,
and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration. He is
a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left"> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
<img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
December 2005</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><font size="6"><b>WWDD-2006 Preamble</b></font></p>
<p><strong>by Roger Feldman -- Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
</strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine
Magazine: 2</em>006/01/14)<br>
</font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
</span></p>
<font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
<font SIZE="3">
</font>
<i></i>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY">2005 was the year when intelligent design (ne
creationism) clashed with natural selection (Darwinism). It was also the
year of EPACT: yet another effort by man to emulate nature by promulgating
laws to govern the adaptation to change of its institutions. High among
these changes was the right to allow the Species Utilities to commingle and
cohabit ("hold" or "merge") with each other without supervening excessive
oversight by "semi-divine" surrogates for the public interest (SEC or FERC).</p>
<font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2">
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></p>
</font>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY">However, that Utilitarian Act measures had to be fit into
the American system: one basically skeptical of the disinterested
capabilities of mankind to act without individual self interest overcoming
the commonweal. As we all thought we had learned in grade school, in the
nature of the tripartite system of our "founders" however, is one "checks
and balances" (not to be confused with balanced checkbooks). In it the
Legislature’s broad intent is divined and implemented by officers of the
Executive (in this case, principally the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission) and perhaps in turn be subjected to judicial review. </p>
<font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2">
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></p>
</font>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY">We’re not at that second stage yet. We’re at Stage I.
It’s hard to tell if it’s about "creationism" or "survival of the fittest"
masquerading as creationism. The Legislature, in the person of the Chairman
of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee, now seeks to cause the
Executive to construe EPACT’s "original meaning" as he understands it (as
distinguished-perhaps – from how the two houses of Congress understood it.
His action can be judged from a legal standpoint (and doubtless ultimately
will at some point). Misinterpretation should be evaluated by us however,
from the standpoint of its impact on the evolution of the energy industry.
Without turning "red" or "blue" in the face, let’s grasp the evolutionary
significance of this debate for the electric power industry (which is, after
all, the central nervous system of the American organism in which the body
politic resides). </p>
<font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2">
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></p>
</font>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY">At issue are whether FERC has set off on the right path
in implementing EPACT’s replacement of the 1935 Public Utility Holding
Company Act and the modifications of its provisions regarding merger review,
FERC has proposed rules in each of these areas [RMO5-32 (PUHCA) and RM05-34
(merger guidelines)]. Congressman Barton, one of the principal drafters of
EPACT, has filed comments in each case thundering his delineation of
Congressional intent. </p>
<font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2">
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></p>
</font>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY">EPACT clearly repealed the detailed SEC-managed machinery
held over from the New Deal, which first leveled the watered-securities
pyramid-utility abuses of that era and then for decades thereafter coldly
eyed the efforts of the survivors to engage in intercorporate transactions,
of newcomers to broaden out their utility platforms through acquisitions
which were not geographically integrated together and of the regulated to
matriculate profits into unregulated – even unrelated areas of endeavor. The
PUHCA portion of EPACT was dubbed a "books and records statute" though
crypt, not cryptography was the intention of many of its sponsors. Perhaps
inevitably, as a corollary of Parkinson’s law, the FERC entry into the post-PUHCA
implementation field entailed trying to preclude through extensive
disclosure what could not longer be imposed by statutory fiat. Equally
inevitably, the oxen who thought a yoke was to be lifted from them felt
gored. And so, Congressman Barton made vigorously clear that "PUHCA is a
regulatory reform not a regulatory vacuum." He denounced not only the
importation of new replacement record and filing requirements, but also the
extension of these requirements to previously PUHCA – exempt persons –
electric wholesale generators (utility owned/market-based rates entitled);
foreign utility companies (FUCOs) – and certain passive holders of utility
securities (e.g., mutual funds). He also opposed FERC’s efforts to preserve
through its proposed regulations, limitations on cross-subsidization and
structural protection mandates with roots in PUHCA.</p>
<font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2">
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></p>
</font>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY">Part of the justification of PUHCA repeal was that it was
better to have one watchdog – FERC – applying its statutory jurisdictional
authority (which were in some measure enhanced by EPACT) and providing
necessary public interest protection, than two. SEC therefore exits left.
Steriodly enhancing FERC are EPACT measures including review of purely
generation transfers, and arrangements to preclude affiliate-abuse. Dollar
thresholds for taking cases were raised and provision for expedited review
also were included. In its proposed regulations, cross-subsidization was
very much in the crosshairs of FERC and cash management, previously a
subject of PUHCA regulation was added. So too was merger by FUCOs with their
US affiliates. (Surviving into the new law are the old, limiting statutory
standards for merger approval of causing "no harm" on rates, competition,
and regulation, FERC’s application of the same competition standards as are
applied by DOJ and FTC to mergers in far less complicated and specialized
industries than power. In response to these Agency incursions, Congressman
Barton pointedly reminded the FERC that "EPACT was not intended to expand
significantly the Commission’s jurisdiction or provide for more burdensome
regulations."</p>
<font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2">
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></p>
</font>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY">One can and many will argue indefinitely over the
constitutional proprieties of Barton’s actions; the meaning of Congressional
and original intent; the appropriateness of agencies filling in the major
administrative lacunae left by sweeping Congressional pronouncements; the
public policy merits of deregulation of wholesale rates and of combination
of companies given the proclivities of unrestricted parties in free markets
to conspire (noted by Adam Smith not Karl Marx and hailed by some social
Darwinists as the ne plus ultra of human adaptation). No, we are in the year
of the Beagle, and the question is: WWDD (What Would Darwin Do?) Put
differently: do our rules regulating actions of electric utility persons
lead to the continuation of an electric power central nervous system which
can adapt on behalf of the social organism to the challenges of our current
and coming ages. The challenges to be faced in these ages – need for fuel
cost control and conservation in the face likely rising energy prices;
adaptation of new technologies to exploit new digital age telecommunications
markets (one of the goals of deregulation in the telecommunication field);
reliability of response to natural disasters and secure hardening of
response to man-made disasters; reduction of market barriers to the
introduction of new technologies (one of the goals of deregulation in the
telecommunication field). Automatic or knee jerk answers are not in order.
Capital scale capability is important; but encouragement of innovation and
more sophisticated system linkage (as distinguished from territorial
insularity) is too. Mergers are not a proven solution to national problems
and are not necessarily efficiency producers. Unleashing the free spirit of
capitalism does not by itself serve all of these requirements; motivated,
cooperative, thoughtful mammals outstripped the giants they succeeded on
earth (although it took an energy crisis-like meteor to make way for them).
</p>
<font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2">
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></p>
</font>
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY">WWDD? The conclusion arrived at, as 2006 dawns, is that
there is no perfect intelligent design for man’s affairs. There is both a
need for allowing for industry scale and rational consolidation, and a need
for nurturing innovation which scale sometimes crushes. There is a need to
not let formulae – which frequently ultimately represents the interests of
those propounding them as much as eternal reasoning – (from right or left) –
cloud the need for responsive human technical organizations which includes
building inhibitions on human and corporate nature in the equation. </p>
<font FACE="Palatino" SIZE="2">
<p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></p>
</font>
<p>Having said something like this, Darwin would mount a Galapagos Tortoise
bareback, salute not only Congressman Barton and Chairman Kelliher, but also
the perfectors of fuel cells and carbon reduction innovations and ride off
into the mists of the future electric of 2006.</p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<hr color="#FFFF00">
<p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews
Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related
to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40
years. In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and
substantial value of project financings. He chairs the American Bar
Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board
of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official
in the Federal Energy Administration. He is a graduate of Brown University,
Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"> </td>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
<p align="center"> </p>
</body>
</html>