KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/feldman/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/feldman/0504flmn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>April 2005: Don't Know Much About History</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
	<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
	<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
	<a href="../searchpma.htm">
	<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
	<br>
	</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
	ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon 
	Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and 
	energy projects and companies for 40 years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed 
	and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He 
	chairs the American Bar Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and 
	Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy, 
	and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is 
	a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
	<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left">&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top">
	<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
      April 2005</u></b></p>
    <p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Don't Know Much About History</b></font></p>
    <p><strong>by Roger Feldman&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine 
    Magazine: 2</em>005/05/05)<br>
    </font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
    &nbsp;</span></p>
    <font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
    <font SIZE="3">
    </font>
    <i></i>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">Not so long ago, the long 
    march toward deregulation was launched. The departure of Pat Wood from FERC, 
    who led the good fight for deregulation, signals an appropriate time to 
    consider what profit we can learn from the experience. In particular, it 
    would be useful to consider it implications for on-going environmental 
    market-based experiments and green political initiatives. What happened? 
    Will it happen again? Is Charley Brown running to kick a football which Lucy 
    is teeing up, to yank away?</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">Analysts have emphasized how 
    different the power experience has been from that of other networked 
    industries. They have focused on the lack of central Federal control, the 
    physically less integrated nature of the electric transmission/distribution 
    network, and the political stress of simultaneous efforts to tackle the 
    retail and wholesale markets at once. In effect, an all fronts campaign was 
    launched without sufficient logistics in place to support it. New power 
    capacity was delivered, but so was congestion; not delivered for the most 
    part were lower prices or an expanding coordinated sustainable whole grid.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">Inevitably, however, 
    formalistic, formulaic explanations of the fate of deregulation like these 
    leave out the important real world business factors which inevitably morph 
    the elegant intellectual frameworks which scholars and regulators seek to 
    put in place.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">What did the players want 
    from the game? The initial large industrial customers pushed deregulation, 
    as a means flowering utility prices-they were not pursuing the greatest good 
    for the greatest number. Neither were the clever utilities, which turned 
    deregulation on its head, into a model for offloading stranded costs, for 
    fielding their own unregulated expansionary subsidiaries, and policies for 
    consolidation. The &#8220;deregulated&#8221; power proponents (whether utility or 
    non-utility) were focused on penetration of formerly insulated utility 
    service territories at prices below those at which the &#8220;home town&#8221; players - 
    their feet anchored in regulatory concrete - could compete. The new power 
    trading companies wanted to increase the volume of transactions regardless, 
    of where, as in California, flawed systems might take them - or be 
    manipulated into taking them. And many utilities (and their regional 
    political supporters) did not want their vertical integration disturbed, and 
    were also seeking to prevent the export of their relatively low cost power 
    to other regions, which deregulation demonstrably would impose on them.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">In the event, all of these 
    industry developments were blurred by the understandable propensity of those 
    in the business of marketing capital to support schemes to achieve the 
    respective goals of which ever parties supported growth or consolidation or 
    other deals - right up to the point where the market overheated &#8212; and then 
    schemes to tap the residual financial potential of distressed asset 
    divestiture. The whole era should not, in short, be stylized or styled as 
    one of the progressive supporters of &#8220;competition&#8221; against the recalcitrant 
    suppliers of &#8220;regulation.&#8221;</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">Back in the heyday of 
    deregulation, the environmental sector was concerned that prevention of 
    environmental benefits would be trampled in the flight to market-based lower 
    cost resources. It was then that the drive to special public service 
    changes, mandatory resource performance standards and the precursors of RECs 
    (green tags) first began to develop. A candid appraisal of the green 
    movement&#8217;s success during the period in which large scale non-polluting 
    combined cycle facilities were in vogue mustbe that its impact was marginal.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">Which leaves the question: 
    Is there anything that green power advocates should learn from the saga of 
    power deregulation and its tenuous relationship to it?</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">They are, of course, faced 
    with a very different energy market fuel structure than when deregulation 
    took hold. There are renewable technologies which in the current market 
    (taken together with tax and other incentives) are roughly competitive for 
    smaller power production requirements. But, as with the deregulating power 
    market, the renewables industry confronts many rate-based utilities with a 
    limited voluntary appetite for change; a transmission infrastructure not 
    well designed for the operating patterns of renewables; and, above all, the 
    fact that Federalism has been pressed into the service of those with the 
    strongest interests in their respective states. As with deregulation, it 
    isn&#8217;t a case of complete alignment of perceived virtue and public policy: 
    Nukes and clean coal meet some of the environmental criteria which small 
    biomass projects do, and their proponents now seek to have us believe in&#8221; 
    blue power.&#8221;</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">Is there an approach for the 
    renewable industry to overcome these problems? Only one ultimately works in 
    America: make the energy economy an offer it cannot refuse. Make the 
    transmission of green RECs across State lines a simple, uniform process and 
    define those Rocs to have significant environmental points of any type into 
    &#8220;scores&#8221;, i.e. economic value provided they meet any of several potential 
    green goals. In short; provide incentives for uniformity in REC tracking, 
    measurement and securitability.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">But there needs to be more . 
    . . The green movement should seek to encourage development of &#8220;plugin&#8221; 
    hybrid cars which can use conventional power supplements, produced from the 
    resulting green power. By doing so, the utility industry would be brought 
    into play in meeting our national security/imported oil displacement 
    requirements. In short, the green movement seeks incentives for consumer 
    benefits as well as costly consumer internalization of externalities.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">It would appear that the 
    lessons to be learned by supporters of renewable energy from the brief, 
    brutal history of deregulation are:</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">&#8226; Support national goals, 
    not abstract economic or environmental principals;</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">&#8226; justify uniform federal 
    policies not fragmented multi-state regulation which only does what is 
    needed piecemeal and ultimately fragments;</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">&#8226; create as many profitable 
    opportunities for as many of the energy sector players as possible: though 
    trading and investing swell as manufacture and consumption;</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">&#8226; keep your plans simple and 
    your expectations realistic, and do not resort out of frustration to 
    &#8220;commandant control&#8221; if they aren&#8217;t realized.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black">Perhaps the green-power 
    effort can look in the fun-house history of deregulation mirror and extract 
    some lessons. As Santayana (the philosopher not the rocker!) might have said 
    had he been a Washington lawyer: &#8220;Those who do not learn from energy history 
    are going to spend a great deal of money to learn it again.&#8221;</span></p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
	<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews 
	Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related 
	to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40 
	years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and 
	substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He chairs the American Bar 
	Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board 
	of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official 
	in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Brown University, 
	Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center>

<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021