|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/enrgy/feldman/ |
Upload File : |
<html>
<head>
<title>January 2005: New Year Bon MOTS</title>
</head>
<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
<tr>
<td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
<img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
<area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
<a href="../searchpma.htm">
<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
<p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
<br>
</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon
Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and
energy projects and companies for 40 years. In particular, he has analyzed
and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings. He
chairs the American Bar Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and
Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy,
and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration. He is
a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left"> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
<img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
January 2005</u></b></p>
<p align="center"><font size="6"><b>New Year Bon MOTS</b></font></p>
<p><strong>by Roger Feldman -- Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
</strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine
Magazine: 2</em>005/01/26)<br>
</font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
</span></p>
<font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
<font SIZE="3">
</font>
<i></i>
<p>What’s the good word (the “bon mot”, now that France again is no longer
our enemy). As the New Year opens, the power industry is confronted with
three basic trends which while susceptible of harmonization by a strong and
wise regulatory body and an enlightened capital market, are more likely to
result in what at least one think tank (mine) refers to as More of the Same
(“MOTS”). Each is enlivened by bon mot.<br>
<br>
<b>MOT 1</b> Where better to start than with an organization whose good name
alone makes fervid flacks blush, the “Progress and Freedom Foundation (“PFF”).
PFF is gunning for Pat Wood a harbinger to what we may expect to be a
plethora of attacks on the RTOs and of deregulatory models designed to
promote open access and the possibility of competition. PFF goes all the way
back and attacks Order 2000 and the subsequent flawed FERC effort to
establish coherence among reliability regions through SMD as the cause for
the absence of incentives for needed transmission development. In fact, for
PFF, this absence of investment capital for transmission is the proof of
FERC’s failure to support the demands of a new competitive market.<br>
<br>
Well – it is probably true that Pat Wood, who declared last year that the
battle over RTO’s is over, (but wasn’t exactly clear which way), will be
leaving Washington. And it is also true that the recent comments on FERC’s
Notice of Inquiry on RTO Accounting have focused a spotlight on the
possibility that RTO’s have become a costly part of the transmission cost
problem, in all but the tightest power pools. In those comments, utilities
blasting the impact of ISO costs to ratepayers were joined by no less a
strange bedfollow than the APPA. The bill for RTO’s has been high; the
perceived benefits to consumers has been low; the enthusiasm for the new is
old; the power of the entrenched is high. However, there is a hollow sound
beneath this pounding on the fragile RTO carapace; no one has suggested how
the shortfalls in transmission investment will be met old model alternative.
Certainly it is not apparent that renewed interest in wholesale trading
among large utilities is likely to have that effect. Which leads to . . .<br>
<br>
<b>MOT 2 </b>Nevertheless, with increasing verve, against a thunderous
leitmotif of “I told you so”, the battle cry of “Back to Basics” is heard in
the electricity Board rooms of the Land. To the probable joy of those
consultants who have wrung out the last possible permutations and shaken out
the acronym bag of deregulation, the notion has now been reintroduced that
utilities should be about, (pause for drum roll), performing service better,
cutting costs and servicing shareholders, all under the old style regulatory
scheme. Unfortunately, utilities are public-regulated companies and what may
be a sure fire slogan for whole grain bread sales is now coming to be
questioned out there as the moral fiber equivalent of shrinking to
greatness. Wall Street wants action; so do dynamic utility executives. All
of which means that the “Back to Basics” slogan will actually mean - now
more than ever - an emphasis on consolidation, size, creation of economics
of scale, and renewed interest in classical vertical integration. MOT 2
therefore is really a soubriquet for “Support Your Local Mega Merger” (a la
Exelon and PSE&G), unless it runs into that hoary of Back to Basics - which
is “Back to State Regulation”. Return with us now to the days of rate cases,
intervenors, prudency and the possibility that along with the incredible
shrinking FERC will come a resurgence of State activism as State
Commissioners come to see themselves as Spitzers at the Gate of market
dominance. With some glee, consultants now visualize the possibility that in
this new climate, previously settled rate case tenets like permissible
levels of capital structures, forecasting methodologies and cost allocations
may be revisited with fresh (unfamiliar) eyes. Making money with or without
making mergers may be harder than some utilities expect. In addition, making
holding company leveraged mergers of the type the Unisource acquisition was
thought to be, may find more State impedance than was originally looked for.
Who remembers the days when concern with something called “regulatory
certainty” was the byword of the electric industry. Well, what goes around
comes around. The creaking sound beneath the wholesome utility management
comeback is the beams of efforts to prevent principles of prevention of
market dominance from giving way. The high pitched whine is the entry of new
types of traders.<br>
<br>
<b>MOT 3</b> Which brings us to one possible market reaction for which
we should be on the alert: “Hedge your bets, sell now”. The chaos of the
last few years has wreaked havoc with the ownership of IPPs, brought a new
speculative private capital element into both private equity ownership,
hedge fund involvement with transient situations, and broader utilization of
short term speculative B Loan financing debt. In short, an influx of Movers
who are not concerned to be shakers of the status quo, and have even begun
to take positions as owners of full scale utilities. Power traders are
emerging to create PPAs which make their deals possible. On the one hand,
you may say very exciting: certain to add ginger to the “basics” in that
rising power dough being baked in the name of “Back to Basics.” However,
just as the fuel price at the margin drives power prices; so the market for
utilities (and power plants) will be driven by what those who are not in it
for the long pull, just betting on the market cycle will do. Will the
tectonic plates of utility consolidation and speculative asset divestitures
converge into some type of tsunami of deals, without reference directly to
actual system operations, a stable regulatory environment and new
transmission grid support? Or will the logic of trading desks perversely
affect new capital flow into the industry. For example, as one monitor of
the trading desk environment has observed: “I would expect that any
investment bank or hedge fund currently invested in assets would include a
risk premium on expected returns (in new assets) to account for negative
impacts in their current investments.” In other words, new capital flows
into the market will be sensitive to the impacts of such new capital flows
on existing investments. Which could mean a kind of pregnant pause in needed
utility market investment while the current investment cobra digests its
most recent dinner, and simply is disinterested in fresh asset investment.<br>
<br>
So the three bon MOTS of the hour could be:</p>
<ul>
<li>Disappearing grid integration impetus;<br>
</li>
<li>Consolidating utilities and renewed regulation at the State level;<br>
</li>
<li>Dampered new capital flows and synthetic new PPAs.</li>
</ul>
<p>The three bon mots (progress and freedom; back to basics; hedge your
risks”) could turn out to be as wise as three blind mice. It is with
interest we await to see how the policies of the new wisdom will impact
these intractable realities. Maybe, in the recent great tradition of
progress and freedom, the proponents will simply declare (and perhaps from
their own personal standpoint believe) that, in another bon MOT of the day:
“Mission Accomplished.”</p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<hr color="#FFFF00">
<p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews
Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related
to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40
years. In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and
substantial value of project financings. He chairs the American Bar
Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board
of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official
in the Federal Energy Administration. He is a graduate of Brown University,
Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"> </td>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
<p align="center"> </p>
</body>
</html>