|
Server : Apache/2.4.62 System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64 User : www ( 80) PHP Version : 8.3.8 Disable Function : NONE Directory : /domains/enrgy/feldman/ |
Upload File : |
<html>
<head>
<title>November 2004: Forever Young, FOrever Morning After</title>
</head>
<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
<tr>
<td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
<img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
<area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
<area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
<a href="../searchpma.htm">
<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
<p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
<br>
</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon
Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and
energy projects and companies for 40 years. In particular, he has analyzed
and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings. He
chairs the American Bar Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and
Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy,
and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration. He is
a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left"> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
<img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
</u></b><u><b>November 2004</b></u></p>
<p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Forever Young, Forever Morning After</b></font></p>
<p><strong>by Roger Feldman -- Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
</strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine
Magazine: 2</em>005/01/08)<br>
</font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
</span></p>
<font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
<font SIZE="3">
</font>
<i></i>
<p>The pattern of purveyors electric energy policy in the past few decades
has been to broach a theory based on theoretical economics; to allow it to
be torqued by the regulatory process until it emerges theoretically fine,
with limited reference to how it will be creatively exploited by
entrepreneurs utilizing the financial markets; to glory in the efflorescence
of proliferating project developments resulting from the policy; and then to
scramble to pick up the pieces when market excesses distort the operational
profile of the marketplace. It is a story of forever young, forever morning
after. Will the enchantment, forever assuming that policy models can trump
creative capitalism.<br>
<br>
• So it was with PURPA machines, awarded cost based rates on hockey stick
projections, the fatuous export of the privatization model and the morning
after assessments of overpriced markets.<br>
<br>
• So it was with merchant power plants predicted on phantom sales reflecting
dimly foreseen tech driven burgeoning demand, the proliferation of
aggressive project leveraging and commitment of trading excess, and the
morning after assessments of supply glut, distressed assets and the collapse
of merchant power credit ratings.<br>
<br>
Comes then the present. The old deregulation initiatives stagger about,
confined mostly to high priced blue states that drank the competition
nostrum as the solution to high prices while red states lie glutted and
strewn with underutilized combined cycle gas plants marginalized by spark
spread shifts and the self serving imperious scorn of the lords of the
native loads. The cry of “back to basics” is heard in the land as the
roseate glowing prospect of rate basing new assets glimmers is in the eyes
of utilities, and their bankers alike. Back to the future; on to the next up
growth cycle.<br>
<br>
But there is a ghost as this banquet: the rubble of partly finished and
non-competitive plants held by lenders; the residue of unwanted facilities
held by utilities outside of service territory. For some of these
facilities, there seems to be no market clearing price low enough to make
their power competitive. And a rogue spirit as well. For an increasingly
larger number of facilities there seems to be the prospect of life after
“merchant hood” - possession by an increasing number of equity funds, hedge
funds or specialty consultant investment groups, counting for profits on a
variety of theories - secular upswing on load requirements, market pocket
availability; enhancements to value; rebirth after falling off the power
contract cliff.<br>
<br>
But there is generally one common feature among these buyers; of these
facilities; they are not in it for the long run. They have a target return,
a possibility of refinancing at a lower capital cost and, above all, a focus
on exit strategy when target return can be achieved, generally at a rate
(fully leveraged) at least competitive with assets in other industries.<br>
<br>
And to whose hands is passage of these assets likely? Increasingly, the
prospect is that it will be the traditional utilities, as they move back to
basics, flattening the profile for competition, and leaving behind the
structures of the old PUHCA rules deemed obsolete in the new competitive
market environment. Suddenly the FERC screens for market power, or for
allowing market based rates seem candidates for “Ebay” “antique”:
inapplicable to the market demands of “willing” buyers for willing sellers.
Greater attention is required to market structure issues in this new
setting.<br>
<br>
Enter the catchup policy conundrum: whether to foster this movement of
assets to stronger hands; seek to foster diversity of disposition
candidates; limit the competitive portion of acquisitions of the “new
resurgents”, who may rate base whatever they bring? Thus, then the reality
to which regulators should be seeking to adapt. To assure if not
competition, at least consumer protection in the resulting mix of asset
transfers. If not a national RPS, at least some incentive to use green
technologies. If not new generation capacity, at least enhanced system
distribution. In short, regulators need to provide that the “army surplus”
of deregulated assets’ which floods the market, is put on by players who in
some way are partial toward efficient public service or operations of
facilities in a way at least conducive to greater system reliability.<br>
<br>
With such large dollars at stake, as well as the competitive profile of new
facility entrants able to weather the marketplace. FERC and State regulators
face a variation of the challenge which all regulators with “deregulated”
industries ultimately face, making sure that depositions of assets; so
stronger hands is beneficial through planning incentives and sanctions, to
the public interest - which manifestly is unlikely to be the beneficiary of
retail competition. It involves paying greater attention to ways in which
trading, DG and grid strengthening are brought into play as surrogates for
multiple ownership within service territories. It involves more than keeping
order among the bottom feeding catfish. It involves the challenge of
assuring that the morning after is not just a hangover, as are many other
power policy efforts have been. Perhaps a rethinking of how and by whom
resources planning should be conducted would throw light on this situation
as well.<br>
<br>
In short, what is required is a recognition of where the financial markets
are likely to take the physical assets they have brought into being who the
acquiring parties are likely to be; and what types of guidance and/or
protection are reasonable under the circumstances. Time to accept the wisdom
gained in earlier ages of reform; to decide what goals policy makers really
are in place to protect, and to prevent financial excesses from leading
regulation into harmful eddies of boom, bust or gouge. No longer young, but
determined to have a sounder morning after.</p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->
<hr color="#FFFF00">
<p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews
Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related
to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40
years. In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and
substantial value of project financings. He chairs the American Bar
Association’s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board
of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official
in the Federal Energy Administration. He is a graduate of Brown University,
Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>
<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"> </td>
<td width="75%" valign="top">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>