KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/feldman/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/feldman/0405flmn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>May 2004: Name This Tune</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
	<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
	<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
	<a href="../searchpma.htm">
	<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
	<br>
	</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
	ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon 
	Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and 
	energy projects and companies for 40 years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed 
	and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He 
	chairs the American Bar Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and 
	Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy, 
	and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is 
	a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
	<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left">&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top">
	<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
      </u></b><u><b>May 2004</b></u></p>
    <p align="center"><font size="6"><b>Name This Tune</b></font></p>
    <p><strong>by Roger Feldman&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine 
    Magazine: 2</em>004/06/10)<br>
    </font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
    &nbsp;</span></p>
    <font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
    <font SIZE="3">
    </font>
    <i></i>
    <p>Will the name of this publication, &#8220;Merchant Power Monthly&#8221; soon join its 
    earlier incarnation, &#8220;The Cogeneration Letter&#8221; in the dust bin of history? 
    Will its listings of EWGs, QFs and proposed projects give way to a listing 
    of trading indices? Is a league table of leading investors in the works? Or 
    alternatively, something like the major league baseball standings of the 
    country&#8217;s 32 utilities, with little reports on their chief acquisitions or 
    major capital investments? Was US power deregulation, along with its vaunted 
    overseas cousin, privatization, the source of a speculative bubble unfounded 
    in the&nbsp; dynamics of the cyclical business of electric energy production 
    and transmission?<br>
    <br>
    The answer is to be found more in the capital markets than in the policy 
    studies of FERC or even the porkladen proposed energy bills of Congress. And 
    at the moment, it is particularly uncertain because many of the players now 
    idling in the financial corridors of potential utility power are of a 
    different sort than those common in the past. They are funds for the 
    investment of &#8220;private equity&#8221; or high yield debt, in any case at return 
    levels commensurate with the risk now deemed to be characteristic of this 
    once stolid and solid power industry.<br>
    <br>
    Fact is, we are now dealing with what is now again termed a commodity 
    (someone noticed!) and one whose production costs are the subject of the 
    vagaries of another commodity, now once again said to be in short supply 
    (natural gas) and of the politics of pollution (coal) and security, 
    (nuclear, LNG and perhaps even renewables).<br>
    <br>
    The capital markets are also grappling with the prospects for non-payment of 
    the debt which the developers of energy merchants accumulated in the course 
    of developing a massive overbuild of capacity in many geographic regions. A 
    year ago this was perceived as creating an immediate overarching shelf of 
    risk that might taken down the entire industry. Nine out of the twelve 
    merchants and firms dodged that bullet by selling assets or restructuring 
    debt. In a scathing analysis Peter Rigby of Standard &amp; Poor has suggested 
    that debt levels are still excessive and the problem has not gone away. He 
    assembles a variety of data to support the underlying hypotheses that the 
    fundamentals of companies involved in the industry simply are not 
    attractive; plants are long lived; market entry is not as difficult as was 
    thought; and spark spread margins are thin, declining and subject to risk 
    and market competition forces which merchant power into a price taking 
    position. His conclusions: &#8220;By almost every measure, the 12 energy merchants 
    exhibit surprisingly weak credit fundamentals . . . (T)hey will struggle to 
    improve their credit measures by any significant degree.&#8221; He anticipates 
    that traditional lenders will back away from the sector.&#8221;<br>
    <br>
    All that said, there is both a terrific build up of private equity funds 
    seeking to acquire power assets (generally those with existing contracts) 
    and an increasing amount of high yield debt filling the vacuum previously 
    occupied by traditional providers (possibly with equity swaps in mind). 
    There are also firms taking possession of the restructured shells of IPPs. 
    In short, while much money has been lost and is endangered, a considerable 
    amount has come to the table.<br>
    <br>
    There is one problem: it is money seeking high yields in a short period of 
    time. If not from operations &#8212; which seems likely to be the case where 
    lucrative and leverageable long-term contracts are not involved- then from 
    asset flips based on attractive purchase and sale prices. Why, however, this 
    should be the case, given the S&amp;P analysis of the fundamentals, remains to 
    be seen. Who will the buyer of last resort be? Logically, I would suggest 
    only the utilities will be left standing, investing in assets for future 
    use. As of now, FERC&#8217;s renewed emphasis on competition has locked them out 
    of their own markets. It remains to be seen if that will continue to be the 
    case in the future. Perhaps, the &#8220;Merchant Power Monthly&#8221; should consider a 
    fine old name like &#8220;Public Utility Reports.&#8221;</p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
	<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews 
	Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related 
	to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40 
	years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and 
	substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He chairs the American Bar 
	Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board 
	of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official 
	in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Brown University, 
	Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center>

<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021