KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/enrgy/feldman/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/enrgy/feldman/0202flmn.htm
<html>

<head>
<title>February 2002: Frodo's Physics and Gandalf's Pretzel</title>
</head>

<body style="font-family: Arial" vlink="#808080">
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" width="98%" bgcolor="#000000">
  <tr>
    <td width="100%" valign="middle"><a name="top"></a>
    <img src="../images/pmamagsm.gif" alt="PMA Online Magazine" border="0" align="right" width="229" height="100"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center">
	<!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_sidebar.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

<table border="0" cellpadding="8" width="98%" id="table1">
  <tr>
    <td width="25%" valign="top" align="center"><map name="FPMap0_I1">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/adrates.html" shape="rect" coords="14, 297, 97, 322">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 230, 95, 257">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm" target="_parent" shape="rect" coords="12, 163, 96, 189">
      <area href="http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect" coords="12, 95, 96, 121">
      <area href="../pmamag.htm" shape="rect" coords="11, 29, 96, 54"></map>
	<img rectangle="(12,163) (96,189) http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm##_parent" rectangle="(12,95) (96,121) http://www.powermarketers.com/power2.htm##_blank" rectangle="(11,29) (96,54) ../pmamag.htm" src="../images/magmenu.gif" alt="PMA OnLine Magazine Menu" border="0" align="center" usemap="#FPMap0_I1" width="110" height="350"><p>
	<a href="../searchpma.htm">
	<img src="../images/archives.gif" alt="Archives Search" border="0" align="center" WIDTH="70" HEIGHT="40"></a></p>
    <p align="left"><font face="Arial"><strong><small>About The Author:<br>
	<br>
	</small></strong><span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black"><font size="2">
	ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon 
	Markets Group has practiced law related to the finance of environmental and 
	energy projects and companies for 40 years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed 
	and executed a wide variety and substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He 
	chairs the American Bar Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and 
	Finance, serves on the Board of the American Council for Renewable Energy, 
	and has been a senior official in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is 
	a graduate of Brown University, Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</font></span></font></p>
	<p class="BodyText05DS" align="left" style="text-align:left">&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a href="#top">
	<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="35"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="19883" endspan --></td>
    <td width="75%" valign="top">
    <img src="../images/feldman.gif" alt="Washington Viewpoint by Roger Feldman" border="0" width="375" height="75"><p><b><u><br>
      February 2002</u><br>
      </b></p>
    <p><font size="6">Frodo's Physics and <br>
    Grandalf's Pretzel</font></p>
    <p><strong>by Roger Feldman&nbsp; -- &nbsp; Bingham, Dana L.L.P.<br>
    </strong><font face="Arial" size="2">(<em>originally published by PMA OnLine Magazine:
    2002</em>/03/09)<br>
    </font><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Palatino; color: black">
    &nbsp;</span></p>
    <font FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="1"><i></i></font>
    <p>As smoke from the Twin Towers continued to drift over New<br>
    York well after 9/11, so the miasma from Enron&#8217;s wreckage<br>
    continues to darken the skies of deregulation. There are, of<br>
    course, its real world implications of lender credit exposure,<br>
    investor recoil from the power industry, trading liquidity shrink-age<br>
    and rapid decay in value of other marketing companies.</p>
    <p>In addition, there is the fact of its intellectual fallout: the 
    credibility of the concept of competitive markets and deregulation, so 
    beloved of Skilling and Lay, lies under a cloud. Were these wizards simply 
    figuratively forging the Tolkienesque evil &quot;one ring to hold them in the 
    dark and bind them&quot;: the regulatory conceptual bond to ensnare the equally 
    gullible and greedy worlds of prehistoric utilities and intellectually 
    hyperintense academics?</p>
    <p>Our Frodo, the FERC, now seeks to carry the ring of market power &#8211; 
    revealed in California as radiating potential harm resulting from all too 
    ready grant of market-based rates (MBRs) &#8211; to a new crucible of economic 
    reason shaped by the price spike experiences in the Midwest and California. 
    That crucible, the market-based rates investigation order (EL01-118-000), 
    requires in relevant part the inclusion of the following language in all 
    market-based tariffs:</p>
    <p>&quot;As a condition of obtaining and retaining market based rates authority, 
    the seller is prohibited from engaging in anticompetitive behavior or the 
    exercise of market power. The seller&#8217;s competitive rate authority is subject 
    to refunds or other remedies as may be appropriate to address any 
    anticompetitive behavior or exercise of market power.&quot; </p>
    <p>A review of the comments FERC has received&nbsp; reveals, however, that 
    our Frodo is like a physicist seeking to apply Newtonian laws of supply and 
    demand economics/physics to a market long since known to be in constant flux 
    under the governance of uncertainty principles. Three aspects of this flaw 
    in Frodonian analysis are: its treatment of time; the certainty of physical 
    location in the time/space continuum; and the effect of pro-active 
    observation on observed phenomena.</p>
    <p>(1) Time. The fundamental FERC theory of MBR reform is to prevent future 
    bad behavior by attaching an unknown price (i.e., future rate refunds) to 
    current behavior later found to be bad (i.e., existing rates). Those who 
    object to this approach offer not only the legal argument that doing so 
    exceeds FERC&#8217;s power under the Federal Power Act, but also the more 
    metaphysical one that governance of future events is best provided by 
    prescriptive rules, advising parties how future events will be governed, and 
    thereafter enforced, once there is violation of those events. </p>
    <p>(2) Space. FERC would provide, in its newly-promulgated standards, fixed 
    economic definitions of when market power is deemed to be present, based on 
    comparison of the mass of the generator&#8217;s capacity versus the peaking supply 
    gap in the market. Imbalance &#8211;&quot;physical and economic withholding of 
    supplies&quot; in FERC&#8217;s lexicon &#8211; is deemed to have occurred when the market 
    price exceeds a supplier&#8217;s &quot;full incremental costs.&quot; But cost, that 
    seemingly solid rock, is (as one might surmise by analogy from the weary 
    history of PURPA-avoided costs) an elusive fact along the time-space 
    continuum; does it include &#8211; and can such pro-posed inclusion be measured &#8211; 
    actual costs of providing power,&nbsp; opportunity costs, capital costs, or 
    some amalgam of them all? In addition, how (as well as over what time 
    period) are they to be physically measured? What electron microscope will 
    this our scientific Frodo use?</p>
    <p>(3) Uncertainty. In an effort to righteously follow market performance 
    and freeze-frame bad behavior in the act, FERC ignores two key variants on 
    Heisenberg&#8217;s Law, loosely summarized as the principle that the very fact of 
    observation may impact results. </p>
    <p>For power markets, the law takes two forms. One variant &#8211; a humbling 
    caveat to the would-be deistic ratemaker &#8211; was even articulated by the 
    Commission itself: </p>
    <p>&quot;Every time we intervene in one market, we affect other markets and 
    prevent rather than support the development of efficient, competitive power 
    markets.&quot; </p>
    <p>The other variants, sometimes known &#8211; perhaps somewhat un-fairly &#8211; as the 
    Gordon Gekko (&quot;Greed is Good&quot;) corollaries are: (a) deprivation of the 
    upside potential for market profits ultimately slows investment in markets, 
    which are driven by speculation in the possibility of such upside; and (b) 
    uncertainty as to what regulators will firmly permit, as power sales rates 
    deprives power markets of their ability to serve as capital magnets by 
    reducing certainty as to the investment potential of&nbsp; power projects. 
    In particular, all the petals of the daisy chain of trading can be wilted by 
    one trade being found to be non-MBR in character. </p>
    <p>In short, Frodo confronts the Enron paradox: a market is sick because of 
    its behavior, but must emulate some of its features or become sicker for 
    failure to do so. </p>
    <p>Clearly, something must be done. Something really did happen in 
    California that could happen elsewhere. But can Frodo do it while defying 
    the laws of physics, particularly when the capital markets firmly believe 
    they drive financial choices? Perhaps after a full rulemaking in which 
    better-defined guidelines are laid out (notwithstanding that Frodo has drawn 
    his refund/price cap sword already). The haze of Enron scandal pervades the 
    capitol. Can a rulemaking truly be objective and achieve support until that 
    haze is dissipated? There is no law of physics on this point. It is the 
    conundrum known as Gandalf&#8217;s Pretzel. </p>
    <!--webbot bot="Include" U-Include="wv_bottom.htm" TAG="BODY" startspan -->

    <hr color="#FFFF00">
    <p class="MsoBodyText" align="left" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:left"><font face="Arial" size="2">
	<span lang="X-NONE" style="color: black">ROGER FELDMAN, Co-Chair of Andrews 
	Kurth LLP Climate Change and Carbon Markets Group has practiced law related 
	to the finance of environmental and energy projects and companies for 40 
	years.&nbsp; In particular, he has analyzed and executed a wide variety and 
	substantial value of project financings.&nbsp; He chairs the American Bar 
	Association&#8217;s Committee on Carbon Trading and Finance, serves on the Board 
	of the American Council for Renewable Energy, and has been a senior official 
	in the Federal Energy Administration.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Brown University, 
	Yale Law School and Harvard Business School.</span></font></p>

<!--webbot bot="Include" i-checksum="63395" endspan --></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center>

<p align="center"><a href="#top">
<img src="../images/b-t-top.gif" alt="Back To Top" border="0" width="71" height="35"></a></p>
</body>
</html>

Anon7 - 2021