KGRKJGETMRETU895U-589TY5MIGM5JGB5SDFESFREWTGR54TY
Server : Apache/2.4.62
System : FreeBSD fbsdweb2.web.rcn.net 14.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE releng/14.1-n267679-10e31f0946d8 GENERIC amd64
User : www ( 80)
PHP Version : 8.3.8
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /domains/daveculp/Savineau/articles/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /domains/daveculp/Savineau/articles/tri_abs.htm
<HTML>

<HEADER>
<TITLE>Abstract Trifoiler Paper SNAME</TITLE>
</HEADER>

<BODY BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF>
<HR>
During the Fall of 1993, Greg Ketterman, the TriFoiler's designer, came to 
<A HREF="http://web.mit.edu/">MIT</A> for some advice. The TriFoiler seemed
to reach an unsurmountable speed barrier around 44 knots, at which point
the foils lost all their lift, and the boat came crashing down in the water.
He suspected that at those speeds the foils were cavitating. I ran a series
of tests in MIT Marine Hydrodynamics Water Tunnel, using a full scale sized
foil of his boat. The results of these tests were presented at the <EM>New 
England Section SNAME Meeting</EM>.
<HR>
<DL>
<DT>
<STRONG>Experimental and Analytical Investigation of a Cavitating 
Hydrofoil: The TriFoiler as a Case Study.</STRONG>
C. Savineau, J. Paschkewitz.  
<EM>Presented at the New England Section SNAME Meeting</EM>, MIT. 
February 3 1994.</P>
<DD> 
A full scale hydrofoil wing of a high speed sail boat was tested in 
MIT's Marine Hydrodynamics Cavitation tunnel. Force and flow measurements 
were made at several angles of attack, and cavitation numbers. Lift 
coefficients were calculated using load cell force measurements and 
were compared to lift coef calculated using momentum flux integration from 
flow measurements made with a Laser Doppler Velocimeter (LDV.) Cavitation 
growth with varying angle of attack and cavitation number was measured using 
the LDV. At low angles of attack, lift coef calculations were more reliable 
than direct load cell measurements. Performance curves were calculated to 
determine under what conditions the hydrofoil no longer performs to its
design characteristics. Numerical calculations, using a low-order, 
potential-based boundary element method, were made to simulate the 
experimental conditions. The numerically predicted calculations for lift coef
and cavitation number were in very good agreement with the experimental data.
Relying on numerical simulations only, further in depth analysis and 
recommendations for foil design improvements are made</P>
</DL>

</BODY>
</HTML>

Anon7 - 2021